Ernesto H. Pedroza-Parga, M. Velásquez-Valle, A. Pedroza-Sandoval, I. Sánchez-Cohen, L. G. Yáñez-Chávez
{"title":"植被覆盖对土壤侵蚀和径流沉积的影响","authors":"Ernesto H. Pedroza-Parga, M. Velásquez-Valle, A. Pedroza-Sandoval, I. Sánchez-Cohen, L. G. Yáñez-Chávez","doi":"10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.12.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In arid regions, soil losses are caused by torrential rainfall events and by the erosive energy of runoff. Objectives: To quantify the impact of the use of different types of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition caused by overland flow. Methodology: The experiment was carried out from July to September 2017 under a randomized block experimental design with three replications. The treatments evaluated were maize harvest residues and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) sowing (MHR + G), maize harvest residues (MHR), buffel grass sowing (G), and the control (C). Results: The MHR + G treatment reduced erosion by 44 % (26.3 t·ha-1) compared to the control (58.6 t·ha-1). Soil deposition was 47.6 and 51.7 t·ha-1 with MHR + G and G, respectively, while in C was 26.1 t·ha-1. Limitations of the study: The results found are valid for the soil and water conditions of this study Originality: There are few technical and scientific reports on the behavior of soil particle removal and deposition processes under runoff conditions. Conclusions: The layer thickness of soil removed and deposited, under overland flow conditions, depends on the type of soil cover. The MHR + G treatment significantly reduced soil erosion, making it a viable alternative.","PeriodicalId":132972,"journal":{"name":"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition due to runoff\",\"authors\":\"Ernesto H. Pedroza-Parga, M. Velásquez-Valle, A. Pedroza-Sandoval, I. Sánchez-Cohen, L. G. Yáñez-Chávez\",\"doi\":\"10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.12.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In arid regions, soil losses are caused by torrential rainfall events and by the erosive energy of runoff. Objectives: To quantify the impact of the use of different types of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition caused by overland flow. Methodology: The experiment was carried out from July to September 2017 under a randomized block experimental design with three replications. The treatments evaluated were maize harvest residues and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) sowing (MHR + G), maize harvest residues (MHR), buffel grass sowing (G), and the control (C). Results: The MHR + G treatment reduced erosion by 44 % (26.3 t·ha-1) compared to the control (58.6 t·ha-1). Soil deposition was 47.6 and 51.7 t·ha-1 with MHR + G and G, respectively, while in C was 26.1 t·ha-1. Limitations of the study: The results found are valid for the soil and water conditions of this study Originality: There are few technical and scientific reports on the behavior of soil particle removal and deposition processes under runoff conditions. Conclusions: The layer thickness of soil removed and deposited, under overland flow conditions, depends on the type of soil cover. The MHR + G treatment significantly reduced soil erosion, making it a viable alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.12.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.12.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition due to runoff
Introduction: In arid regions, soil losses are caused by torrential rainfall events and by the erosive energy of runoff. Objectives: To quantify the impact of the use of different types of vegetation cover on soil erosion and soil deposition caused by overland flow. Methodology: The experiment was carried out from July to September 2017 under a randomized block experimental design with three replications. The treatments evaluated were maize harvest residues and buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) sowing (MHR + G), maize harvest residues (MHR), buffel grass sowing (G), and the control (C). Results: The MHR + G treatment reduced erosion by 44 % (26.3 t·ha-1) compared to the control (58.6 t·ha-1). Soil deposition was 47.6 and 51.7 t·ha-1 with MHR + G and G, respectively, while in C was 26.1 t·ha-1. Limitations of the study: The results found are valid for the soil and water conditions of this study Originality: There are few technical and scientific reports on the behavior of soil particle removal and deposition processes under runoff conditions. Conclusions: The layer thickness of soil removed and deposited, under overland flow conditions, depends on the type of soil cover. The MHR + G treatment significantly reduced soil erosion, making it a viable alternative.