用网络科学指标识别过程图属性

L. Verçosa, Renato Cirne, C. B. Filho, B. Bezerra
{"title":"用网络科学指标识别过程图属性","authors":"L. Verçosa, Renato Cirne, C. B. Filho, B. Bezerra","doi":"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process Mining graphs are models that represent business processes. These graphs have been used in some contexts as social networks and process concept drift. However, they have scarcely been studied in the context of network science as graphs with particular properties. In this work, we used network science metrics and machine learning models to distinguish process graphs from diverse non-process graphs belonging to social and random models. We performed our experiments with a real dataset containing multiple process logs from a Brazilian justice system. We generated non-process graphs with Barabási, Duplication-Divergence, Erdõs-Rényi, Gaussian Random Partition, and Newman Watts Strogatz generators. Our results suggest that the metrics used are highly efficient to distinguish among the analysed graphs. The process graphs presented particular characteristics such as higher clustering coefficient and lower assortativity than non-process graphs. These findings may encourage the usage of network science metrics and machine learning models for process mining challenges in big data logs.","PeriodicalId":431041,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Process Graphs Properties with Network Science Metrics\",\"authors\":\"L. Verçosa, Renato Cirne, C. B. Filho, B. Bezerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Process Mining graphs are models that represent business processes. These graphs have been used in some contexts as social networks and process concept drift. However, they have scarcely been studied in the context of network science as graphs with particular properties. In this work, we used network science metrics and machine learning models to distinguish process graphs from diverse non-process graphs belonging to social and random models. We performed our experiments with a real dataset containing multiple process logs from a Brazilian justice system. We generated non-process graphs with Barabási, Duplication-Divergence, Erdõs-Rényi, Gaussian Random Partition, and Newman Watts Strogatz generators. Our results suggest that the metrics used are highly efficient to distinguish among the analysed graphs. The process graphs presented particular characteristics such as higher clustering coefficient and lower assortativity than non-process graphs. These findings may encourage the usage of network science metrics and machine learning models for process mining challenges in big data logs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI48322.2021.9769833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流程挖掘图是表示业务流程的模型。这些图已经在社会网络和过程概念漂移的某些环境中使用。然而,在网络科学的背景下,它们很少被作为具有特定属性的图来研究。在这项工作中,我们使用网络科学指标和机器学习模型来区分过程图与属于社会模型和随机模型的各种非过程图。我们使用一个真实的数据集进行实验,其中包含来自巴西司法系统的多个过程日志。我们使用Barabási、duplicate - divergence、Erdõs-Rényi、高斯随机分区和Newman Watts Strogatz生成器生成了非过程图。我们的结果表明,所使用的指标是非常有效的区分分析图。与非过程图相比,过程图具有较高的聚类系数和较低的分类度等特点。这些发现可能会鼓励使用网络科学指标和机器学习模型来解决大数据日志中的流程挖掘挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Process Graphs Properties with Network Science Metrics
Process Mining graphs are models that represent business processes. These graphs have been used in some contexts as social networks and process concept drift. However, they have scarcely been studied in the context of network science as graphs with particular properties. In this work, we used network science metrics and machine learning models to distinguish process graphs from diverse non-process graphs belonging to social and random models. We performed our experiments with a real dataset containing multiple process logs from a Brazilian justice system. We generated non-process graphs with Barabási, Duplication-Divergence, Erdõs-Rényi, Gaussian Random Partition, and Newman Watts Strogatz generators. Our results suggest that the metrics used are highly efficient to distinguish among the analysed graphs. The process graphs presented particular characteristics such as higher clustering coefficient and lower assortativity than non-process graphs. These findings may encourage the usage of network science metrics and machine learning models for process mining challenges in big data logs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信