氯胺酮辅助电休克治疗改善抑郁的时间过程。

B. Romeo, W. Choucha, P. Fossati, J. Rotge
{"title":"氯胺酮辅助电休克治疗改善抑郁的时间过程。","authors":"B. Romeo, W. Choucha, P. Fossati, J. Rotge","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent and elegant meta-analysis, McGirr et al 1 assessed ketamine adjunction in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which is frequently used in pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder. Because ketamine demonstrated good efficacy in depression, some studies assessed the potentiation of ECT by using ketamine as the anesthetic agent. In their meta-analysis, the authors included 5 randomized controlled trials comparing the antidepressive effects of ketamine + ECT (K + ECT) versus another anesthetic agent + ECT (AAA + ECT). No significant difference in remission or response rates, or in depressive symptoms was observed with or without ketamine adjunction in ECT. However, results from many studies argued for a possible ketamineinduced improvement of depressive symptoms during the very first week of treatment. Thus, a time-course of ketamine effects in ECT may provide relevant information in addition to the data supplied in the meta-analysis. To investigate the time-course of ketamine’s action, we searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2015. Details concerning the data sources, study selection process (Figure S1), data extraction, and the data analyses were given in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). With one exception, original means and SDs for the depression scores were kindly provided by the authors of the original publications. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between the depression scores in K + ECT and AAA + ECT groups were calculated at different time points, as follows: (1) baseline, (2) 1 or 2 ECTs, (3) 3 or 4 ECTs, (4) 5 or 6 ECTs, and (5) post-ECT (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). Six trials, including a total of 185 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the included studies were described in Table S1. Three trials showed no difference between the ketamine and control groups, 1 trial reported improvement in the depression score on the first day after ECT, and 2 other trials described","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Course of Depression Improvement With Ketamine Adjunction in Electroconvulsive Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"B. Romeo, W. Choucha, P. Fossati, J. Rotge\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a recent and elegant meta-analysis, McGirr et al 1 assessed ketamine adjunction in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which is frequently used in pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder. Because ketamine demonstrated good efficacy in depression, some studies assessed the potentiation of ECT by using ketamine as the anesthetic agent. In their meta-analysis, the authors included 5 randomized controlled trials comparing the antidepressive effects of ketamine + ECT (K + ECT) versus another anesthetic agent + ECT (AAA + ECT). No significant difference in remission or response rates, or in depressive symptoms was observed with or without ketamine adjunction in ECT. However, results from many studies argued for a possible ketamineinduced improvement of depressive symptoms during the very first week of treatment. Thus, a time-course of ketamine effects in ECT may provide relevant information in addition to the data supplied in the meta-analysis. To investigate the time-course of ketamine’s action, we searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2015. Details concerning the data sources, study selection process (Figure S1), data extraction, and the data analyses were given in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). With one exception, original means and SDs for the depression scores were kindly provided by the authors of the original publications. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between the depression scores in K + ECT and AAA + ECT groups were calculated at different time points, as follows: (1) baseline, (2) 1 or 2 ECTs, (3) 3 or 4 ECTs, (4) 5 or 6 ECTs, and (5) post-ECT (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). Six trials, including a total of 185 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the included studies were described in Table S1. Three trials showed no difference between the ketamine and control groups, 1 trial reported improvement in the depression score on the first day after ECT, and 2 other trials described\",\"PeriodicalId\":287576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在最近的荟萃分析中,McGirr等人1评估了氯胺酮在电休克治疗(ECT)中的辅助作用,电休克治疗经常用于耐药的重度抑郁症。由于氯胺酮在抑郁症中表现出良好的疗效,一些研究评估了氯胺酮作为麻醉剂对电痉挛疗法的增强作用。在他们的荟萃分析中,作者纳入了5个随机对照试验,比较氯胺酮+ ECT (K + ECT)与另一种麻醉剂+ ECT (AAA + ECT)的抗抑郁效果。在ECT治疗中,有无氯胺酮辅助治疗,在缓解率、反应率或抑郁症状方面均无显著差异。然而,许多研究的结果表明,在治疗的第一周,氯胺酮可能会导致抑郁症状的改善。因此,除了meta分析中提供的数据外,氯胺酮在ECT中作用的时间过程可能提供相关信息。为了研究氯胺酮作用的时间过程,我们检索了MEDLINE和PsycINFO数据库,截至2015年1月。有关数据来源、研究选择过程(图S1)、数据提取和数据分析的详细信息请参见补充数字内容1 (http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41)。除了一个例外,抑郁评分的原始均值和SDs均由原始出版物的作者提供。计算K + ECT组和AAA + ECT组抑郁评分在不同时间点的标准化平均差异(SMD)如下:(1)基线,(2)1或2 ECTs,(3) 3或4 ECTs,(4) 5或6 ECTs, (5) ECT后(见补充数字内容1,http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41)。我们的荟萃分析纳入了6项试验,共185名患者。纳入研究的主要人口学和临床特征见表S1。3项试验显示氯胺酮组与对照组之间无差异,1项试验报告ECT后第一天抑郁评分改善,另外2项试验描述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-Course of Depression Improvement With Ketamine Adjunction in Electroconvulsive Therapy.
In a recent and elegant meta-analysis, McGirr et al 1 assessed ketamine adjunction in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which is frequently used in pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder. Because ketamine demonstrated good efficacy in depression, some studies assessed the potentiation of ECT by using ketamine as the anesthetic agent. In their meta-analysis, the authors included 5 randomized controlled trials comparing the antidepressive effects of ketamine + ECT (K + ECT) versus another anesthetic agent + ECT (AAA + ECT). No significant difference in remission or response rates, or in depressive symptoms was observed with or without ketamine adjunction in ECT. However, results from many studies argued for a possible ketamineinduced improvement of depressive symptoms during the very first week of treatment. Thus, a time-course of ketamine effects in ECT may provide relevant information in addition to the data supplied in the meta-analysis. To investigate the time-course of ketamine’s action, we searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2015. Details concerning the data sources, study selection process (Figure S1), data extraction, and the data analyses were given in Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). With one exception, original means and SDs for the depression scores were kindly provided by the authors of the original publications. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between the depression scores in K + ECT and AAA + ECT groups were calculated at different time points, as follows: (1) baseline, (2) 1 or 2 ECTs, (3) 3 or 4 ECTs, (4) 5 or 6 ECTs, and (5) post-ECT (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JECT/A41). Six trials, including a total of 185 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the included studies were described in Table S1. Three trials showed no difference between the ketamine and control groups, 1 trial reported improvement in the depression score on the first day after ECT, and 2 other trials described
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信