推拉因素与网络闲逛的手段链框架:基于LadderUX的软阶梯研究

Sauvik Kumar Batabyal, K. Bhal
{"title":"推拉因素与网络闲逛的手段链框架:基于LadderUX的软阶梯研究","authors":"Sauvik Kumar Batabyal, K. Bhal","doi":"10.1108/jices-05-2022-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPrevious studies on cyberloafing have so far not focused on the interlinkages among push factors, pull factors, consequences of actions and value orientations of the employees in a comprehensive manner. The purpose of this study is to close that gap by integrating push-pull theory with means-end chain framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a soft-laddering technique, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Indian employees from various organizations with prior written consent. After performing the content analysis and preparation of ladders, an implication matrix and a hierarchical value map were constructed using the LadderUX tool.\n\n\nFindings\n“Upholding conversational conformity,” “achieving efficiency through noise cancellation,” “addressing occasional requirements,” “social networking as a coping mechanism,” “staying informed and sharing opinions,” “attempting job or profile alteration” and “fulfilling transactional obligations” turned out to be the seven prominent means-end chain patterns, with their respective push-pull factors, consequences and value orientations. This study also suggested the multifaceted character of cyberloafing in a continuum, from “serious-destructive” to “minor-positive” to “facilitative-productive.”\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has been conducted by focusing on cyberloafing at physical workplaces and not in the context of distributed work environments.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study will enable organizations to frame an appropriate set of guidelines to control this behavior.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to integrate the push-pull theory and means-end chain framework to explore the nuances of cyberloafing among employees.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Push-pull factors and means-end chain framework of cyberloafing: a soft laddering study using LadderUX\",\"authors\":\"Sauvik Kumar Batabyal, K. Bhal\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jices-05-2022-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPrevious studies on cyberloafing have so far not focused on the interlinkages among push factors, pull factors, consequences of actions and value orientations of the employees in a comprehensive manner. The purpose of this study is to close that gap by integrating push-pull theory with means-end chain framework.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing a soft-laddering technique, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Indian employees from various organizations with prior written consent. After performing the content analysis and preparation of ladders, an implication matrix and a hierarchical value map were constructed using the LadderUX tool.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\n“Upholding conversational conformity,” “achieving efficiency through noise cancellation,” “addressing occasional requirements,” “social networking as a coping mechanism,” “staying informed and sharing opinions,” “attempting job or profile alteration” and “fulfilling transactional obligations” turned out to be the seven prominent means-end chain patterns, with their respective push-pull factors, consequences and value orientations. This study also suggested the multifaceted character of cyberloafing in a continuum, from “serious-destructive” to “minor-positive” to “facilitative-productive.”\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study has been conducted by focusing on cyberloafing at physical workplaces and not in the context of distributed work environments.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of this study will enable organizations to frame an appropriate set of guidelines to control this behavior.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to integrate the push-pull theory and means-end chain framework to explore the nuances of cyberloafing among employees.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":156416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-05-2022-0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-05-2022-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的以往关于网络漫游的研究尚未全面探讨员工的推动因素、拉动因素、行为后果和价值取向之间的相互关系。本研究的目的是通过将推拉理论与手段端链框架相结合来弥补这一差距。设计/方法/方法采用软阶梯技术,在事先书面同意的情况下,对来自不同组织的21名印度员工进行了半结构化访谈。在进行内容分析和编制阶梯后,使用LadderUX工具构建隐含矩阵和层次值图。结果表明,“保持会话一致性”、“通过降噪实现效率”、“解决偶发需求”、“以社交网络为应对机制”、“保持信息和分享意见”、“尝试改变工作或个人资料”和“履行交易义务”是七种突出的手段-目的链模式,并具有各自的推拉因素、后果和价值取向。这项研究还表明,网络闲逛具有连续统一体的多面性,从“严重破坏性”到“轻微积极”再到“促进-生产”。研究局限/启示本研究的重点是在实体工作场所进行的网络闲逛,而不是在分布式工作环境中进行的。实际意义本研究的发现将使组织能够制定一套适当的指导方针来控制这种行为。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次将推拉理论与手段-终端链框架相结合,探讨员工网络闲逛的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Push-pull factors and means-end chain framework of cyberloafing: a soft laddering study using LadderUX
Purpose Previous studies on cyberloafing have so far not focused on the interlinkages among push factors, pull factors, consequences of actions and value orientations of the employees in a comprehensive manner. The purpose of this study is to close that gap by integrating push-pull theory with means-end chain framework. Design/methodology/approach Using a soft-laddering technique, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Indian employees from various organizations with prior written consent. After performing the content analysis and preparation of ladders, an implication matrix and a hierarchical value map were constructed using the LadderUX tool. Findings “Upholding conversational conformity,” “achieving efficiency through noise cancellation,” “addressing occasional requirements,” “social networking as a coping mechanism,” “staying informed and sharing opinions,” “attempting job or profile alteration” and “fulfilling transactional obligations” turned out to be the seven prominent means-end chain patterns, with their respective push-pull factors, consequences and value orientations. This study also suggested the multifaceted character of cyberloafing in a continuum, from “serious-destructive” to “minor-positive” to “facilitative-productive.” Research limitations/implications This study has been conducted by focusing on cyberloafing at physical workplaces and not in the context of distributed work environments. Practical implications The findings of this study will enable organizations to frame an appropriate set of guidelines to control this behavior. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to integrate the push-pull theory and means-end chain framework to explore the nuances of cyberloafing among employees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信