{"title":"Visum Et Repertum在真正的地方法院对伊斯兰法律的观点进行调查时所起的作用","authors":"Nur Ahmad U, Kasjim Salenda","doi":"10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main problem of this research is related to the role of Visum Et Repertum in uncovering the crime of murder. Islamic Law Perspective Case Study Number 438/Pid. b/ 2020/ PN. Sungguminasa. To answer these problems, the authors use a methodology, namely: 1) Interviews with judges who handle cases described in the background. 2) Data analysis, namely the author uses qualitative data analysis, in which the author uses qualitative descriptive. The results of the study are that although it is not absolute that there is a visum et revertum in proving criminal cases, but to strengthen the judge's confidence, so that visum et revertum should always exist, especially criminal acts whose object is the human body, and visum et repertum is a piece of evidence which is not binding on judges, so that the visum et repertum is only a complementary evidence. However, in certain cases where the available evidence is minimal or lacking, visum et repertum is the main evidence that must be used as a basis by the judge. So that the visum et repertum can also be used as evidence that is binding and has legal force so that the visum et repertum issued by a team of expert doctors is a necessity, especially regarding cases of murder crimes. The position of visum et repertum in Islamic law is as the application of ijtihad for judges to obtain truth and justice, namely as evidence, precisely as written evidence or in Islam known as al-bayyinah because it can create benefit for mankind.Keywords: Visum Et Repertum; Cases of Murder; Islamic Law","PeriodicalId":321272,"journal":{"name":"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peranan Visum Et Repertum dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Perspektif Hukum Islam di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa\",\"authors\":\"Nur Ahmad U, Kasjim Salenda\",\"doi\":\"10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main problem of this research is related to the role of Visum Et Repertum in uncovering the crime of murder. Islamic Law Perspective Case Study Number 438/Pid. b/ 2020/ PN. Sungguminasa. To answer these problems, the authors use a methodology, namely: 1) Interviews with judges who handle cases described in the background. 2) Data analysis, namely the author uses qualitative data analysis, in which the author uses qualitative descriptive. The results of the study are that although it is not absolute that there is a visum et revertum in proving criminal cases, but to strengthen the judge's confidence, so that visum et revertum should always exist, especially criminal acts whose object is the human body, and visum et repertum is a piece of evidence which is not binding on judges, so that the visum et repertum is only a complementary evidence. However, in certain cases where the available evidence is minimal or lacking, visum et repertum is the main evidence that must be used as a basis by the judge. So that the visum et repertum can also be used as evidence that is binding and has legal force so that the visum et repertum issued by a team of expert doctors is a necessity, especially regarding cases of murder crimes. The position of visum et repertum in Islamic law is as the application of ijtihad for judges to obtain truth and justice, namely as evidence, precisely as written evidence or in Islam known as al-bayyinah because it can create benefit for mankind.Keywords: Visum Et Repertum; Cases of Murder; Islamic Law\",\"PeriodicalId\":321272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的主要问题是关于“遗言”在揭露谋杀犯罪中的作用。伊斯兰法视角案例研究编号438/Pid。b/ 2020/ PN。Sungguminasa。为了回答这些问题,作者使用了一种方法,即:1)采访处理背景中描述的案件的法官。2)数据分析,即作者采用定性数据分析,其中作者采用定性描述。研究的结果是,虽然在刑事案件举证中存在举证证据并非绝对存在,但要加强法官的信心,使举证证据始终存在,特别是以人体为对象的犯罪行为,举证证据是对法官不具有约束力的证据,因此举证证据只是一种补充证据。但是,在某些可获得证据很少或缺乏证据的情况下,“证据和补充”是法官必须作为依据使用的主要证据。如此一来,书面陈述也可以作为具有约束力和法律效力的证据,因此,由专家医生团队出具书面陈述是必要的,特别是在杀人罪案件中。visum et repertum在伊斯兰教法中的地位是作为法官获得真理和正义的伊智提哈德的应用,即作为证据,确切地说是书面证据,在伊斯兰教中被称为al-bayyinah,因为它可以为人类创造利益。关键词:剧目;谋杀案件;伊斯兰律法
Peranan Visum Et Repertum dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Perspektif Hukum Islam di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa
The main problem of this research is related to the role of Visum Et Repertum in uncovering the crime of murder. Islamic Law Perspective Case Study Number 438/Pid. b/ 2020/ PN. Sungguminasa. To answer these problems, the authors use a methodology, namely: 1) Interviews with judges who handle cases described in the background. 2) Data analysis, namely the author uses qualitative data analysis, in which the author uses qualitative descriptive. The results of the study are that although it is not absolute that there is a visum et revertum in proving criminal cases, but to strengthen the judge's confidence, so that visum et revertum should always exist, especially criminal acts whose object is the human body, and visum et repertum is a piece of evidence which is not binding on judges, so that the visum et repertum is only a complementary evidence. However, in certain cases where the available evidence is minimal or lacking, visum et repertum is the main evidence that must be used as a basis by the judge. So that the visum et repertum can also be used as evidence that is binding and has legal force so that the visum et repertum issued by a team of expert doctors is a necessity, especially regarding cases of murder crimes. The position of visum et repertum in Islamic law is as the application of ijtihad for judges to obtain truth and justice, namely as evidence, precisely as written evidence or in Islam known as al-bayyinah because it can create benefit for mankind.Keywords: Visum Et Repertum; Cases of Murder; Islamic Law