{"title":"“当一个人谈论制度时,他的情况是无望的”:拜伦在浪漫反主流文化的边缘","authors":"Friederike Wolfrum","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439411.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A strong belief in the countercultural agency of literary texts is one of the defining features of Romanticism, as evidenced in concepts ranging from the Wordsworthian ‘High Argument’ to Percy B. Shelley’s claim that “[p]oets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world”. Byron inhabits a unique position among his contemporaries: hearkening back to Whig ideals of restoration and looking forward to a more sceptical, less ideological world view. An analysis of his working relationship with Leigh Hunt and critique of Hunt’s use of ‘System’ amply demonstrates that Byron’s involvement in Romantic counterculture is characterised by techniques that are less involved in the vehement promotion of social change, but move in an equilibrium between agency and epistemology.","PeriodicalId":119326,"journal":{"name":"Byron and Marginality","volume":"156 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘When a man talks of system, his case is hopeless’: Byron at the Margins of Romantic Counterculture\",\"authors\":\"Friederike Wolfrum\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439411.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A strong belief in the countercultural agency of literary texts is one of the defining features of Romanticism, as evidenced in concepts ranging from the Wordsworthian ‘High Argument’ to Percy B. Shelley’s claim that “[p]oets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world”. Byron inhabits a unique position among his contemporaries: hearkening back to Whig ideals of restoration and looking forward to a more sceptical, less ideological world view. An analysis of his working relationship with Leigh Hunt and critique of Hunt’s use of ‘System’ amply demonstrates that Byron’s involvement in Romantic counterculture is characterised by techniques that are less involved in the vehement promotion of social change, but move in an equilibrium between agency and epistemology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Byron and Marginality\",\"volume\":\"156 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Byron and Marginality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439411.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Byron and Marginality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474439411.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘When a man talks of system, his case is hopeless’: Byron at the Margins of Romantic Counterculture
A strong belief in the countercultural agency of literary texts is one of the defining features of Romanticism, as evidenced in concepts ranging from the Wordsworthian ‘High Argument’ to Percy B. Shelley’s claim that “[p]oets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world”. Byron inhabits a unique position among his contemporaries: hearkening back to Whig ideals of restoration and looking forward to a more sceptical, less ideological world view. An analysis of his working relationship with Leigh Hunt and critique of Hunt’s use of ‘System’ amply demonstrates that Byron’s involvement in Romantic counterculture is characterised by techniques that are less involved in the vehement promotion of social change, but move in an equilibrium between agency and epistemology.