小麦生物量监测最佳高光谱变量的确定

Chen Zhou, Min Jia, Xue Ma, T. Cheng, Yan Zhu, Yongchao Tian, W. Cao, Xia Yao
{"title":"小麦生物量监测最佳高光谱变量的确定","authors":"Chen Zhou, Min Jia, Xue Ma, T. Cheng, Yan Zhu, Yongchao Tian, W. Cao, Xia Yao","doi":"10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is critical to estimate the biomass for assessing crop growth and predicting yield in crop. The hyperspectral techniques provide a powerful technique for monitoring crop biomass. The previous studies about using hyperspectral data to study crop mainly focused on models based on the full spectra or the manually selected spectra. The stability and prediction ability of full spectra models may be weakened because of involving noises, other unrelated and collinear spectral variables. The manually selected spectra were extracted by vegetation indices, spectral absorption features, derivative spectra and spectral locations in common use, which may ignore the other spectral information, not identify the high biomass and impact the accuracy of model. In order to extract the optimal hyperspectral feature of wheat biomass, several algorithms for sensitive variable selection were compared to determine the spectral variables for estimation model of wheat biomass. Synergy interval partial least squares (SIPLS) [1] and successive projections algorithm (SPA) [2] were employed to eliminate useless variables from the full hyperspectral data. On that basis an approach was proposed by combing SIPLS with SPA to determine the optimal spectra. Then, the optimal features were considered as input variables of the partial least-squares regression (PLSR) method [3],which was the mostly used calibration model and regression method. The determination coefficient of calibration (R2C), the root mean square error (RMSEV), relative root mean square error of validation (RMSEV) and the number of input variables were presented to compare the performance of different methods in extracting sensitive spectral information.","PeriodicalId":179622,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of optimal hyperspectral variables to monitor wheat biomass\",\"authors\":\"Chen Zhou, Min Jia, Xue Ma, T. Cheng, Yan Zhu, Yongchao Tian, W. Cao, Xia Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is critical to estimate the biomass for assessing crop growth and predicting yield in crop. The hyperspectral techniques provide a powerful technique for monitoring crop biomass. The previous studies about using hyperspectral data to study crop mainly focused on models based on the full spectra or the manually selected spectra. The stability and prediction ability of full spectra models may be weakened because of involving noises, other unrelated and collinear spectral variables. The manually selected spectra were extracted by vegetation indices, spectral absorption features, derivative spectra and spectral locations in common use, which may ignore the other spectral information, not identify the high biomass and impact the accuracy of model. In order to extract the optimal hyperspectral feature of wheat biomass, several algorithms for sensitive variable selection were compared to determine the spectral variables for estimation model of wheat biomass. Synergy interval partial least squares (SIPLS) [1] and successive projections algorithm (SPA) [2] were employed to eliminate useless variables from the full hyperspectral data. On that basis an approach was proposed by combing SIPLS with SPA to determine the optimal spectra. Then, the optimal features were considered as input variables of the partial least-squares regression (PLSR) method [3],which was the mostly used calibration model and regression method. The determination coefficient of calibration (R2C), the root mean square error (RMSEV), relative root mean square error of validation (RMSEV) and the number of input variables were presented to compare the performance of different methods in extracting sensitive spectral information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物量的估算是评估作物生长和预测作物产量的关键。高光谱技术为作物生物量监测提供了有力的技术手段。以往利用高光谱数据研究作物的研究主要集中在基于全光谱或人工选择光谱的模型上。全光谱模型的稳定性和预测能力会受到噪声和其他不相关的共线性光谱变量的影响。人工选择的光谱是通过植被指数、光谱吸收特征、导数光谱和常用的光谱位置提取的,这可能会忽略其他光谱信息,无法识别高生物量,影响模型的准确性。为了提取小麦生物量的最优高光谱特征,比较了几种敏感变量选择算法,确定了小麦生物量估算模型的光谱变量。采用协同区间偏最小二乘(SIPLS)[1]和逐次投影算法(SPA)[2]消除全高光谱数据中的无用变量。在此基础上,提出了将SIPLS与SPA相结合确定最佳光谱的方法。然后,将最优特征作为最常用的校正模型和回归方法偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)方法[3]的输入变量。通过校正决定系数(R2C)、均方根误差(RMSEV)、相对验证均方根误差(RMSEV)和输入变量数,比较了不同方法提取敏感光谱信息的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of optimal hyperspectral variables to monitor wheat biomass
It is critical to estimate the biomass for assessing crop growth and predicting yield in crop. The hyperspectral techniques provide a powerful technique for monitoring crop biomass. The previous studies about using hyperspectral data to study crop mainly focused on models based on the full spectra or the manually selected spectra. The stability and prediction ability of full spectra models may be weakened because of involving noises, other unrelated and collinear spectral variables. The manually selected spectra were extracted by vegetation indices, spectral absorption features, derivative spectra and spectral locations in common use, which may ignore the other spectral information, not identify the high biomass and impact the accuracy of model. In order to extract the optimal hyperspectral feature of wheat biomass, several algorithms for sensitive variable selection were compared to determine the spectral variables for estimation model of wheat biomass. Synergy interval partial least squares (SIPLS) [1] and successive projections algorithm (SPA) [2] were employed to eliminate useless variables from the full hyperspectral data. On that basis an approach was proposed by combing SIPLS with SPA to determine the optimal spectra. Then, the optimal features were considered as input variables of the partial least-squares regression (PLSR) method [3],which was the mostly used calibration model and regression method. The determination coefficient of calibration (R2C), the root mean square error (RMSEV), relative root mean square error of validation (RMSEV) and the number of input variables were presented to compare the performance of different methods in extracting sensitive spectral information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信