理解和授予android权限:一项用户调查

Selvakumar Ramachandran, Andrea Dimitri, M. Galinium, Muhammad Tahir, Indirajith Viji Ananth, C. Schunck, M. Talamo
{"title":"理解和授予android权限:一项用户调查","authors":"Selvakumar Ramachandran, Andrea Dimitri, M. Galinium, Muhammad Tahir, Indirajith Viji Ananth, C. Schunck, M. Talamo","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2017.8167834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whenever users install a new application on their smart devices with an Android KitKat or Lollipop operating system they are asked to grant the application (app) provider access to features of the device, ranging from data storage to device location and from device identity to the users personal contacts. The implications on users' privacy and security are significant and therefore the users' ability to give informed consent is highly important. Previous work has identified low rates of user attention and comprehension to permission warnings and concluded that these fail to inform the majority of users. Here we focus on how users consider, interpret and react to differences in app permission information which is provided at three different instances of the app installation cycle: 1. Before installation in the Google Play Store 2. During the installation process 3. After installation in the Application Manager. The information provided in these instances varies considerably in its granularity and detail. For this purpose, an online survey was developed in which users were asked questions regarding the installation of a mirror app whose main functionality is to use the user facing camera of the phone to mirror the users face (i.e. display an image of the face) on the phone's screen. The survey participants were shown screen shots of the app description as presented in the Google Play Store as well as of the various permission lists as they appear on the screen of the phone. The questions focused on the respondents' perceptions and their hypothetical choices with regard to the installation of this app. Results show that the various presentations of permission information in Android versions KitKat or Lollipop cause concern and irritate a majority (51.67%) of users, especially those with some basic IT expertise. We conclude that the contextualization of app features and functionalities with the corresponding permissions needs to be improved especially for users with little IT expertise. Further user permission information should be made available at different and consistent levels of granularity.","PeriodicalId":371622,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding and granting android permissions: A user survey\",\"authors\":\"Selvakumar Ramachandran, Andrea Dimitri, M. Galinium, Muhammad Tahir, Indirajith Viji Ananth, C. Schunck, M. Talamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCST.2017.8167834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whenever users install a new application on their smart devices with an Android KitKat or Lollipop operating system they are asked to grant the application (app) provider access to features of the device, ranging from data storage to device location and from device identity to the users personal contacts. The implications on users' privacy and security are significant and therefore the users' ability to give informed consent is highly important. Previous work has identified low rates of user attention and comprehension to permission warnings and concluded that these fail to inform the majority of users. Here we focus on how users consider, interpret and react to differences in app permission information which is provided at three different instances of the app installation cycle: 1. Before installation in the Google Play Store 2. During the installation process 3. After installation in the Application Manager. The information provided in these instances varies considerably in its granularity and detail. For this purpose, an online survey was developed in which users were asked questions regarding the installation of a mirror app whose main functionality is to use the user facing camera of the phone to mirror the users face (i.e. display an image of the face) on the phone's screen. The survey participants were shown screen shots of the app description as presented in the Google Play Store as well as of the various permission lists as they appear on the screen of the phone. The questions focused on the respondents' perceptions and their hypothetical choices with regard to the installation of this app. Results show that the various presentations of permission information in Android versions KitKat or Lollipop cause concern and irritate a majority (51.67%) of users, especially those with some basic IT expertise. We conclude that the contextualization of app features and functionalities with the corresponding permissions needs to be improved especially for users with little IT expertise. Further user permission information should be made available at different and consistent levels of granularity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2017.8167834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2017.8167834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

每当用户在他们的智能设备上安装一个带有Android KitKat或Lollipop操作系统的新应用程序时,他们都被要求授予应用程序(应用程序)提供商访问设备功能的权限,从数据存储到设备位置,从设备身份到用户的个人联系人。对用户隐私和安全的影响是显著的,因此用户给予知情同意的能力是非常重要的。以前的工作已经确定了用户对许可警告的关注和理解率很低,并得出结论,这些警告不能通知大多数用户。在这里,我们关注用户如何考虑、解释和应对应用程序许可信息的差异,这些信息是在应用程序安装周期的三个不同实例中提供的:b谷歌Play Store安装前在安装过程中。在应用程序管理器中安装后。这些实例中提供的信息在粒度和细节上差别很大。为此,我们开展了一项在线调查,向用户询问有关安装镜像应用程序的问题,该应用程序的主要功能是使用手机的面向用户的摄像头在手机屏幕上镜像用户的脸(即显示面部图像)。研究人员向调查参与者展示了谷歌Play Store中应用描述的屏幕截图,以及出现在手机屏幕上的各种许可列表。问题集中在受访者对安装该应用程序的看法和假设选择上。结果表明,Android版本KitKat或Lollipop中权限信息的各种呈现引起了大多数(51.67%)用户的关注和愤怒,特别是那些具有一些基本IT专业知识的用户。我们的结论是,应用程序特性和功能的上下文化与相应的权限需要改进,特别是对于很少有IT专业知识的用户。应该在不同且一致的粒度级别上提供进一步的用户权限信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding and granting android permissions: A user survey
Whenever users install a new application on their smart devices with an Android KitKat or Lollipop operating system they are asked to grant the application (app) provider access to features of the device, ranging from data storage to device location and from device identity to the users personal contacts. The implications on users' privacy and security are significant and therefore the users' ability to give informed consent is highly important. Previous work has identified low rates of user attention and comprehension to permission warnings and concluded that these fail to inform the majority of users. Here we focus on how users consider, interpret and react to differences in app permission information which is provided at three different instances of the app installation cycle: 1. Before installation in the Google Play Store 2. During the installation process 3. After installation in the Application Manager. The information provided in these instances varies considerably in its granularity and detail. For this purpose, an online survey was developed in which users were asked questions regarding the installation of a mirror app whose main functionality is to use the user facing camera of the phone to mirror the users face (i.e. display an image of the face) on the phone's screen. The survey participants were shown screen shots of the app description as presented in the Google Play Store as well as of the various permission lists as they appear on the screen of the phone. The questions focused on the respondents' perceptions and their hypothetical choices with regard to the installation of this app. Results show that the various presentations of permission information in Android versions KitKat or Lollipop cause concern and irritate a majority (51.67%) of users, especially those with some basic IT expertise. We conclude that the contextualization of app features and functionalities with the corresponding permissions needs to be improved especially for users with little IT expertise. Further user permission information should be made available at different and consistent levels of granularity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信