Olaf Beyersdorff, A. Meier, M. Mundhenk, Thomas Schneider, Michael Thomas, H. Vollmer
{"title":"模型检查CTL几乎总是固有顺序的","authors":"Olaf Beyersdorff, A. Meier, M. Mundhenk, Thomas Schneider, Michael Thomas, H. Vollmer","doi":"10.2168/LMCS-7(2:12)2011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The model checking problem for CTL is known to be P-complete (Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla (1986), see Schnoebelen (2002)). We consider fragments of CTL obtained by restricting the use of temporal modalities or the use of negations---restrictions already studied for LTL by Sistla and Clarke (1985) and Markey (2004).For all these fragments, except for the trivial case without any temporal operator, we systematically prove model checking to be either inherently sequential (P-complete) or very efficiently parallelizable (LOGCFL-complete). For most fragments, however, model checking for CTL is already P-complete. Hence our results indicate that in most applications, approaching CTL model checking by parallelism will not result in the desired speed up. We also completely determine the complexity of the model checking problem for all fragments of the extensions ECTL, CTL+, and ECTL+.","PeriodicalId":163298,"journal":{"name":"2009 16th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Checking CTL is Almost Always Inherently Sequential\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Beyersdorff, A. Meier, M. Mundhenk, Thomas Schneider, Michael Thomas, H. Vollmer\",\"doi\":\"10.2168/LMCS-7(2:12)2011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The model checking problem for CTL is known to be P-complete (Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla (1986), see Schnoebelen (2002)). We consider fragments of CTL obtained by restricting the use of temporal modalities or the use of negations---restrictions already studied for LTL by Sistla and Clarke (1985) and Markey (2004).For all these fragments, except for the trivial case without any temporal operator, we systematically prove model checking to be either inherently sequential (P-complete) or very efficiently parallelizable (LOGCFL-complete). For most fragments, however, model checking for CTL is already P-complete. Hence our results indicate that in most applications, approaching CTL model checking by parallelism will not result in the desired speed up. We also completely determine the complexity of the model checking problem for all fragments of the extensions ECTL, CTL+, and ECTL+.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 16th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 16th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2168/LMCS-7(2:12)2011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 16th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2168/LMCS-7(2:12)2011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
已知CTL的模型检查问题是p完备的(Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla(1986),参见Schnoebelen(2002))。我们考虑通过限制使用时间模态或使用否定来获得CTL的片段——Sistla和Clarke(1985)以及Markey(2004)已经对LTL进行了限制研究。对于所有这些片段,除了没有任何时间算子的平凡情况外,我们系统地证明了模型检查要么是固有顺序的(p -完全),要么是非常有效的并行化(logcfl -完全)。然而,对于大多数片段,CTL的模型检查已经是p完全的。因此,我们的结果表明,在大多数应用中,通过并行性来接近CTL模型检查不会导致预期的速度提高。我们还完全确定了扩展ECTL、CTL+和ECTL+的所有片段的模型检查问题的复杂性。
Model Checking CTL is Almost Always Inherently Sequential
The model checking problem for CTL is known to be P-complete (Clarke, Emerson, and Sistla (1986), see Schnoebelen (2002)). We consider fragments of CTL obtained by restricting the use of temporal modalities or the use of negations---restrictions already studied for LTL by Sistla and Clarke (1985) and Markey (2004).For all these fragments, except for the trivial case without any temporal operator, we systematically prove model checking to be either inherently sequential (P-complete) or very efficiently parallelizable (LOGCFL-complete). For most fragments, however, model checking for CTL is already P-complete. Hence our results indicate that in most applications, approaching CTL model checking by parallelism will not result in the desired speed up. We also completely determine the complexity of the model checking problem for all fragments of the extensions ECTL, CTL+, and ECTL+.