S. Fawcett, M. Waller, Jason M. Miller, Matthew Schwieterman, Benjamin T. Hazen, Robert E. Overstreet
{"title":"出版成功的指南:写有影响力的概念、定性和调查研究的技巧","authors":"S. Fawcett, M. Waller, Jason M. Miller, Matthew Schwieterman, Benjamin T. Hazen, Robert E. Overstreet","doi":"10.1111/JBL.12039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publishing in top journals is difficult. Common challenges undermine authors’ attempts to explain and influence their discipline's understanding and practice. We identify and describe these roadblocks to publishing success. We also benchmark best practice in management, marketing, and supply chain journals to provide a trail guide for writing — and publishing — influential conceptual, qualitative, and survey research. Given equifinality in research, our trail guide should not be viewed as the only way to craft excellent, influential research. However, if we agree on the basics, we can (1) increase consistency in the review process, (2) reduce publication cycles, and (3) begin to roll back the length of articles.","PeriodicalId":218558,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"177","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research\",\"authors\":\"S. Fawcett, M. Waller, Jason M. Miller, Matthew Schwieterman, Benjamin T. Hazen, Robert E. Overstreet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/JBL.12039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Publishing in top journals is difficult. Common challenges undermine authors’ attempts to explain and influence their discipline's understanding and practice. We identify and describe these roadblocks to publishing success. We also benchmark best practice in management, marketing, and supply chain journals to provide a trail guide for writing — and publishing — influential conceptual, qualitative, and survey research. Given equifinality in research, our trail guide should not be viewed as the only way to craft excellent, influential research. However, if we agree on the basics, we can (1) increase consistency in the review process, (2) reduce publication cycles, and (3) begin to roll back the length of articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"177\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/JBL.12039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Science & Technology Studies (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/JBL.12039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research
Publishing in top journals is difficult. Common challenges undermine authors’ attempts to explain and influence their discipline's understanding and practice. We identify and describe these roadblocks to publishing success. We also benchmark best practice in management, marketing, and supply chain journals to provide a trail guide for writing — and publishing — influential conceptual, qualitative, and survey research. Given equifinality in research, our trail guide should not be viewed as the only way to craft excellent, influential research. However, if we agree on the basics, we can (1) increase consistency in the review process, (2) reduce publication cycles, and (3) begin to roll back the length of articles.