[多普勒超声心动图评价主动脉反流]。

Journal of cardiology. Supplement Pub Date : 1992-01-01
S Kibira, T Miura, Y Ikeda, G Terui, E Fushimi, H Kimura, Y Kyo, H Murayama, A Nakagomi, H Kousokabe
{"title":"[多普勒超声心动图评价主动脉反流]。","authors":"S Kibira,&nbsp;T Miura,&nbsp;Y Ikeda,&nbsp;G Terui,&nbsp;E Fushimi,&nbsp;H Kimura,&nbsp;Y Kyo,&nbsp;H Murayama,&nbsp;A Nakagomi,&nbsp;H Kousokabe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To establish a method for evaluating aortic regurgitation (AR) using Doppler echocardiography, we studied 104 patients who were classified according to aortographic grading (Sellers). The severity of the AR was graded by measuring the length of AR jet within the left ventricle by pulsed Doppler mapping (mapping method) or by two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (length method). Also, color Doppler echocardiography was used to measure the width of AR jet just below the aortic valve (width method), and pulsed Doppler echocardiography to determine the fraction of integral of forward flow and reverse flow in the abdominal aorta (abdominal method). Although the diagnostic accuracy of grading by these Doppler techniques only ranged between 52% and 68%, the length method combined with the abdominal one enhanced the diagnostic accuracy to 89% in retrospective study and 80% in prospective study. In conclusion, the length method combined with the abdominal method appeared to be useful and reliable in evaluating AR.</p>","PeriodicalId":77193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology. Supplement","volume":"28 ","pages":"97-107; discussion 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography].\",\"authors\":\"S Kibira,&nbsp;T Miura,&nbsp;Y Ikeda,&nbsp;G Terui,&nbsp;E Fushimi,&nbsp;H Kimura,&nbsp;Y Kyo,&nbsp;H Murayama,&nbsp;A Nakagomi,&nbsp;H Kousokabe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To establish a method for evaluating aortic regurgitation (AR) using Doppler echocardiography, we studied 104 patients who were classified according to aortographic grading (Sellers). The severity of the AR was graded by measuring the length of AR jet within the left ventricle by pulsed Doppler mapping (mapping method) or by two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (length method). Also, color Doppler echocardiography was used to measure the width of AR jet just below the aortic valve (width method), and pulsed Doppler echocardiography to determine the fraction of integral of forward flow and reverse flow in the abdominal aorta (abdominal method). Although the diagnostic accuracy of grading by these Doppler techniques only ranged between 52% and 68%, the length method combined with the abdominal one enhanced the diagnostic accuracy to 89% in retrospective study and 80% in prospective study. In conclusion, the length method combined with the abdominal method appeared to be useful and reliable in evaluating AR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"97-107; discussion 108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了建立一种应用多普勒超声心动图评估主动脉反流(AR)的方法,我们研究了104例根据主动脉造影分级(Sellers)进行分类的患者。通过脉冲多普勒测图(测图法)或二维彩色多普勒超声心动图(测长法)测量左心室内AR射流的长度来分级AR的严重程度。彩色多普勒超声心动图测量主动脉瓣正下方AR射流宽度(宽度法),脉冲多普勒超声心动图测定腹主动脉正反流积分的分数(腹部法)。虽然这些多普勒技术分级的诊断准确率仅在52% - 68%之间,但长度法与腹部法结合可将回顾性研究的诊断准确率提高到89%,在前瞻性研究中提高到80%。综上所述,长度法结合腹部法在评估AR方面是有用和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography].

To establish a method for evaluating aortic regurgitation (AR) using Doppler echocardiography, we studied 104 patients who were classified according to aortographic grading (Sellers). The severity of the AR was graded by measuring the length of AR jet within the left ventricle by pulsed Doppler mapping (mapping method) or by two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography (length method). Also, color Doppler echocardiography was used to measure the width of AR jet just below the aortic valve (width method), and pulsed Doppler echocardiography to determine the fraction of integral of forward flow and reverse flow in the abdominal aorta (abdominal method). Although the diagnostic accuracy of grading by these Doppler techniques only ranged between 52% and 68%, the length method combined with the abdominal one enhanced the diagnostic accuracy to 89% in retrospective study and 80% in prospective study. In conclusion, the length method combined with the abdominal method appeared to be useful and reliable in evaluating AR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信