{"title":"你不是我喜欢的类型:英国脱欧前后英国媒体对移民的批判性话语分析","authors":"Mariana Ciocoiu, Rowan Voirrey Sandle","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of high circulation news media sources in the United Kingdom, during the period of Brexit (2016 – 2020). A recent study has found that the type of newspaper read corresponded with a person’s vote in the 2016, Brexit election (Pruitt, 2019). Considering the close link between the media, public opinion and legislation, it is necessary to analyse media discourses to understand the underlying power relations of today’s society and how they influence the average person’s values (Fox et al., 2012; Gabrielatos & Baker, 2008). The dominant discourse found, describes the type of immigrant desired in Britain. The post-Brexit ‘good’ immigrant is described as a hard-working, educated individual willing to adopt British culture and identity, while discussions centre around the need to place a cap on student and work visas to manage immigration. In contrast, low wage workers are seen as ‘bad’ immigrants who are often associated with crime and living off of the welfare system. This article argues that the content of the British Press reflects the current socio-political, neoliberal context where neoliberal values outweigh humanitarian values. This research points out significant contradictions in media discourse regarding immigration. Such contradictions confuse the public whilst also reflecting Britain’s Western supremacist desire of a pick and choose immigration system which only benefits the British economy.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You are not my type: A critical discourse analysis of UK media representations of immigration, before and post Brexit\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Ciocoiu, Rowan Voirrey Sandle\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of high circulation news media sources in the United Kingdom, during the period of Brexit (2016 – 2020). A recent study has found that the type of newspaper read corresponded with a person’s vote in the 2016, Brexit election (Pruitt, 2019). Considering the close link between the media, public opinion and legislation, it is necessary to analyse media discourses to understand the underlying power relations of today’s society and how they influence the average person’s values (Fox et al., 2012; Gabrielatos & Baker, 2008). The dominant discourse found, describes the type of immigrant desired in Britain. The post-Brexit ‘good’ immigrant is described as a hard-working, educated individual willing to adopt British culture and identity, while discussions centre around the need to place a cap on student and work visas to manage immigration. In contrast, low wage workers are seen as ‘bad’ immigrants who are often associated with crime and living off of the welfare system. This article argues that the content of the British Press reflects the current socio-political, neoliberal context where neoliberal values outweigh humanitarian values. This research points out significant contradictions in media discourse regarding immigration. Such contradictions confuse the public whilst also reflecting Britain’s Western supremacist desire of a pick and choose immigration system which only benefits the British economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对英国脱欧期间(2016 - 2020)的高发行量新闻媒体来源进行了批判性话语分析。最近的一项研究发现,在2016年英国脱欧选举中,阅读的报纸类型与一个人的投票相对应(Pruitt, 2019)。考虑到媒体、公众舆论和立法之间的密切联系,有必要分析媒体话语,以了解当今社会的潜在权力关系,以及它们如何影响普通人的价值观(Fox et al., 2012;Gabrielatos & Baker, 2008)。所发现的主导话语,描述了英国所期望的移民类型。英国脱欧后的“好”移民被描述为勤奋、受过良好教育、愿意接受英国文化和身份的人,而讨论的焦点是是否需要对学生和工作签证设置上限,以管理移民。相比之下,低薪工人被视为“坏”移民,他们经常与犯罪和依靠福利制度生活联系在一起。本文认为,英国媒体的内容反映了当前的社会政治、新自由主义背景,在这种背景下,新自由主义价值观超过了人道主义价值观。本研究指出了关于移民的媒体话语中的重大矛盾。这种矛盾使公众感到困惑,同时也反映了英国的西方至上主义的愿望,即一个只有利于英国经济的精选移民制度。
You are not my type: A critical discourse analysis of UK media representations of immigration, before and post Brexit
This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of high circulation news media sources in the United Kingdom, during the period of Brexit (2016 – 2020). A recent study has found that the type of newspaper read corresponded with a person’s vote in the 2016, Brexit election (Pruitt, 2019). Considering the close link between the media, public opinion and legislation, it is necessary to analyse media discourses to understand the underlying power relations of today’s society and how they influence the average person’s values (Fox et al., 2012; Gabrielatos & Baker, 2008). The dominant discourse found, describes the type of immigrant desired in Britain. The post-Brexit ‘good’ immigrant is described as a hard-working, educated individual willing to adopt British culture and identity, while discussions centre around the need to place a cap on student and work visas to manage immigration. In contrast, low wage workers are seen as ‘bad’ immigrants who are often associated with crime and living off of the welfare system. This article argues that the content of the British Press reflects the current socio-political, neoliberal context where neoliberal values outweigh humanitarian values. This research points out significant contradictions in media discourse regarding immigration. Such contradictions confuse the public whilst also reflecting Britain’s Western supremacist desire of a pick and choose immigration system which only benefits the British economy.