{"title":"杂波边缘情况下GOSCA CFAR检测器性能分析","authors":"J. Guan, You He","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the performance of the GOSCA CFAR detector in clutter edge situation. We derive the analytic expressions of false alarm probabilities in clutter edge situation, analyse its performance against clutter edge, and compare it with the OS, CA, GO and SO detectors. Results show that the false alarm control of GOSCA is about the same as CA and OS with k/sub os/=(k+l)/sub GOSCA/, and poorer than that of GO which has the better control of false alarm.","PeriodicalId":326587,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of GOSCA CFAR detector in clutter edge situation\",\"authors\":\"J. Guan, You He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.1995.522615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the performance of the GOSCA CFAR detector in clutter edge situation. We derive the analytic expressions of false alarm probabilities in clutter edge situation, analyse its performance against clutter edge, and compare it with the OS, CA, GO and SO detectors. Results show that the false alarm control of GOSCA is about the same as CA and OS with k/sub os/=(k+l)/sub GOSCA/, and poorer than that of GO which has the better control of false alarm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings International Radar Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Radar Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.1995.522615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文研究了GOSCA CFAR探测器在杂波边缘情况下的性能。推导了杂波边缘情况下虚警概率的解析表达式，分析了其抗杂波边缘的性能，并与OS、CA、GO和SO检测器进行了比较。结果表明，当k/sub OS /=(k+l)/sub GOSCA/时，GOSCA对虚警的控制效果与CA和OS基本相同，而GO对虚警的控制效果较好。
Performance analysis of GOSCA CFAR detector in clutter edge situation
This paper studies the performance of the GOSCA CFAR detector in clutter edge situation. We derive the analytic expressions of false alarm probabilities in clutter edge situation, analyse its performance against clutter edge, and compare it with the OS, CA, GO and SO detectors. Results show that the false alarm control of GOSCA is about the same as CA and OS with k/sub os/=(k+l)/sub GOSCA/, and poorer than that of GO which has the better control of false alarm.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
