{"title":"更具包容性的民主:挑战纽约重刑犯陪审团排除制","authors":"Paula Z. Segal","doi":"10.31641/CLR130204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New York excludes all individuals who have ever been convicted of a felony from its jury pool except in the most extraordinary circumstances. This practice undermines the representativeness of juries, their inclusiveness, as well as public confidence in the courts. It leaves whole communities underrepresented in one of the foundations of democracy. It also compromises an individual’s constitutional rights. People with felonyconviction histories are included in the jury pools of nearly half of United States jurisdictions, yet the effectiveness of judicial systems in those jurisdictions has not been compromised. The mechanisms for insuring that juries are competent and unbiased—voir dire, peremptory challenges and challenges for cause—all work in those jurisdictions without alienating a segment of the population from the mechanisms of civic participation. The citizens of New York deserve no less. Copyright 2011 by Paula Z. Segal. † J.D. Candidate, 2011, Haywood Burns Fellow in Civil and Human Rights, Belle Zeller Scholar, City University of New York School of Law. Thank you to Juan Cartagena at Community Service Society of New York for asking the question and to Professor Ruthann Robson for her guidance in developing the answer into this Note. Thank you also to family and friends who have cheered me on through the writing process. 1 See infra note 3.","PeriodicalId":220741,"journal":{"name":"City University of New York Law Review","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A More Inclusive Democracy: Challenging Felon Jury Exclusion in New York\",\"authors\":\"Paula Z. Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.31641/CLR130204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New York excludes all individuals who have ever been convicted of a felony from its jury pool except in the most extraordinary circumstances. This practice undermines the representativeness of juries, their inclusiveness, as well as public confidence in the courts. It leaves whole communities underrepresented in one of the foundations of democracy. It also compromises an individual’s constitutional rights. People with felonyconviction histories are included in the jury pools of nearly half of United States jurisdictions, yet the effectiveness of judicial systems in those jurisdictions has not been compromised. The mechanisms for insuring that juries are competent and unbiased—voir dire, peremptory challenges and challenges for cause—all work in those jurisdictions without alienating a segment of the population from the mechanisms of civic participation. The citizens of New York deserve no less. Copyright 2011 by Paula Z. Segal. † J.D. Candidate, 2011, Haywood Burns Fellow in Civil and Human Rights, Belle Zeller Scholar, City University of New York School of Law. Thank you to Juan Cartagena at Community Service Society of New York for asking the question and to Professor Ruthann Robson for her guidance in developing the answer into this Note. Thank you also to family and friends who have cheered me on through the writing process. 1 See infra note 3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City University of New York Law Review\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City University of New York Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31641/CLR130204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City University of New York Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31641/CLR130204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
纽约将所有曾经被判重罪的人排除在陪审团之外,除非在最特殊的情况下。这种做法削弱了陪审团的代表性和包容性,也削弱了公众对法院的信心。这使得整个社区在民主的基础之一得不到充分代表。它还损害了个人的宪法权利。在美国近一半的司法管辖区,有重罪前科的人被纳入陪审团,但这些司法管辖区的司法系统的有效性并未受到影响。确保陪审团有能力且无偏见的机制——自言自言、强制性质疑和理由质疑——都在这些司法管辖范围内发挥作用,而不会使一部分人远离公民参与的机制。纽约市民理应如此。Paula Z. Segal版权所有2011。†J.D.候选人,2011年,纽约城市大学法学院海伍德·伯恩斯公民与人权研究员,贝尔·泽勒学者。感谢纽约社区服务协会的Juan Cartagena提出这个问题,感谢Ruthann Robson教授的指导,将答案发展成这篇笔记。也要感谢在写作过程中给我鼓励的家人和朋友。1见附注3。
A More Inclusive Democracy: Challenging Felon Jury Exclusion in New York
New York excludes all individuals who have ever been convicted of a felony from its jury pool except in the most extraordinary circumstances. This practice undermines the representativeness of juries, their inclusiveness, as well as public confidence in the courts. It leaves whole communities underrepresented in one of the foundations of democracy. It also compromises an individual’s constitutional rights. People with felonyconviction histories are included in the jury pools of nearly half of United States jurisdictions, yet the effectiveness of judicial systems in those jurisdictions has not been compromised. The mechanisms for insuring that juries are competent and unbiased—voir dire, peremptory challenges and challenges for cause—all work in those jurisdictions without alienating a segment of the population from the mechanisms of civic participation. The citizens of New York deserve no less. Copyright 2011 by Paula Z. Segal. † J.D. Candidate, 2011, Haywood Burns Fellow in Civil and Human Rights, Belle Zeller Scholar, City University of New York School of Law. Thank you to Juan Cartagena at Community Service Society of New York for asking the question and to Professor Ruthann Robson for her guidance in developing the answer into this Note. Thank you also to family and friends who have cheered me on through the writing process. 1 See infra note 3.