临床研究:医学的未来停留在数字化的过去

Elizabeth Del Mastro Benincasa
{"title":"临床研究:医学的未来停留在数字化的过去","authors":"Elizabeth Del Mastro Benincasa","doi":"10.17140/ctpoj-2-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opinion | Volume 1 | Number 1 | 34 Copyright 2019 by Benincasa EDM. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc T past eight years I’ve spent working at clinical research sites have been gratifying in countless ways. From seeing direct patient improvement as a result of their involvement in a trial to learning about Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a therapy on which we’ve conducted trials, the observable outcomes of contributing to the forefront of scientific knowledge are continuously rewarding. However, despite tangible medical field advances, day-to-day operations are often performed in an antiquated fashion. In this article, I highlight four outdated and inefficient methods still utilized in common clinical trial operations and offer suggestions for updated digital replacements.","PeriodicalId":259842,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Research: The Future of Medicine Stuck in the Digital Past\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Del Mastro Benincasa\",\"doi\":\"10.17140/ctpoj-2-107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Opinion | Volume 1 | Number 1 | 34 Copyright 2019 by Benincasa EDM. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc T past eight years I’ve spent working at clinical research sites have been gratifying in countless ways. From seeing direct patient improvement as a result of their involvement in a trial to learning about Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a therapy on which we’ve conducted trials, the observable outcomes of contributing to the forefront of scientific knowledge are continuously rewarding. However, despite tangible medical field advances, day-to-day operations are often performed in an antiquated fashion. In this article, I highlight four outdated and inefficient methods still utilized in common clinical trial operations and offer suggestions for updated digital replacements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17140/ctpoj-2-107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17140/ctpoj-2-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意见|第一卷|第一个数| 34版权所有:Benincasa EDM这是一篇在知识共享署名4.0国际许可(CC BY 4.0)下发布的开放获取文章,允许在任何媒介或格式下复制、再分发、再混合、转换和复制,甚至是商业复制,只要正确引用原始作品。在过去的八年里,我在临床研究中心工作,在很多方面都让我感到满足。从看到患者参与试验后的直接改善,到了解美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对我们进行试验的疗法的批准,为科学知识的前沿做出贡献的可观察结果不断得到回报。然而,尽管医疗领域取得了实实在在的进步,但日常手术往往以过时的方式进行。在本文中,我强调了四种过时的和低效的方法仍然使用在常见的临床试验操作,并提出了更新的数字替代建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Research: The Future of Medicine Stuck in the Digital Past
Opinion | Volume 1 | Number 1 | 34 Copyright 2019 by Benincasa EDM. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited. cc T past eight years I’ve spent working at clinical research sites have been gratifying in countless ways. From seeing direct patient improvement as a result of their involvement in a trial to learning about Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a therapy on which we’ve conducted trials, the observable outcomes of contributing to the forefront of scientific knowledge are continuously rewarding. However, despite tangible medical field advances, day-to-day operations are often performed in an antiquated fashion. In this article, I highlight four outdated and inefficient methods still utilized in common clinical trial operations and offer suggestions for updated digital replacements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信