Gresik ujungangkah水域传统渔船使用Cantrang渔具作底延绳钓的比较研究

Muhammad Fikri Anwar, Soffiana Agustin, Yulia Ayu Nastiti
{"title":"Gresik ujungangkah水域传统渔船使用Cantrang渔具作底延绳钓的比较研究","authors":"Muhammad Fikri Anwar, Soffiana Agustin, Yulia Ayu Nastiti","doi":"10.30587/ivrj.v2i1.5077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The variety of fishing gear used by fishermen in Indonesia initiates how to choose the most environmentally friendly fishing gear with good efficiency. The Indonesian government bans cantrang fishing gear because it endangers fish ecosystems and coral reefs. It was then replaced with a longline. This study employs a case study method with descriptive analysis focusing on a case in detail and intensively. In addition to reviewing the environmental impact of using fishing gear cantrang and bottom longline, this study also analyzes the costs required for both tools from manufacture to maintenance, and the revenue of the catch. Based on the research conducted, the capital required for cantrang fishing gear is IDR. 29,450,000 and a longline of IDR. 29,030,000. The profit generated by the cantrang fishing gear for a year is IDR. 56,012,000 while the longline is IDR. 33,836,000. Therefore, it can be concluded that replacing the cantrang fishing gear with a bottom longline is considered simpler, environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and easy to develop.","PeriodicalId":186363,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Vocational Research Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of The Traditional Fishing Ship Using Cantrang Fishing Gear to be Bottom Longline in Ujungpangkah Waters, Gresik\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Fikri Anwar, Soffiana Agustin, Yulia Ayu Nastiti\",\"doi\":\"10.30587/ivrj.v2i1.5077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The variety of fishing gear used by fishermen in Indonesia initiates how to choose the most environmentally friendly fishing gear with good efficiency. The Indonesian government bans cantrang fishing gear because it endangers fish ecosystems and coral reefs. It was then replaced with a longline. This study employs a case study method with descriptive analysis focusing on a case in detail and intensively. In addition to reviewing the environmental impact of using fishing gear cantrang and bottom longline, this study also analyzes the costs required for both tools from manufacture to maintenance, and the revenue of the catch. Based on the research conducted, the capital required for cantrang fishing gear is IDR. 29,450,000 and a longline of IDR. 29,030,000. The profit generated by the cantrang fishing gear for a year is IDR. 56,012,000 while the longline is IDR. 33,836,000. Therefore, it can be concluded that replacing the cantrang fishing gear with a bottom longline is considered simpler, environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and easy to develop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Vocational Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Vocational Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30587/ivrj.v2i1.5077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Vocational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30587/ivrj.v2i1.5077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼渔民使用的各种渔具,引发了如何选择最环保、效率高的渔具。印尼政府禁止使用cantrang渔具,因为它危及鱼类生态系统和珊瑚礁。然后用延绳钓代替了它。本研究采用个案研究法,对个案进行详细而深入的描述性分析。本研究除了检视使用钓具和延绳钓对环境的影响外,也分析了这两种工具从制造到维护所需的成本,以及渔获的收益。根据研究结果,沧滩渔具所需资金为IDR。2945万美元和IDR的长线。29030000年。仓仓渔具一年的利润是印尼盾。56,012,000,而延绳线是IDR。33836000年。因此,可以得出结论,用底延绳钓代替仓仓渔具被认为是更简单、环保、便宜、易于开发的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of The Traditional Fishing Ship Using Cantrang Fishing Gear to be Bottom Longline in Ujungpangkah Waters, Gresik
The variety of fishing gear used by fishermen in Indonesia initiates how to choose the most environmentally friendly fishing gear with good efficiency. The Indonesian government bans cantrang fishing gear because it endangers fish ecosystems and coral reefs. It was then replaced with a longline. This study employs a case study method with descriptive analysis focusing on a case in detail and intensively. In addition to reviewing the environmental impact of using fishing gear cantrang and bottom longline, this study also analyzes the costs required for both tools from manufacture to maintenance, and the revenue of the catch. Based on the research conducted, the capital required for cantrang fishing gear is IDR. 29,450,000 and a longline of IDR. 29,030,000. The profit generated by the cantrang fishing gear for a year is IDR. 56,012,000 while the longline is IDR. 33,836,000. Therefore, it can be concluded that replacing the cantrang fishing gear with a bottom longline is considered simpler, environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and easy to develop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信