{"title":"调查非传统单位负载仓库设计中通道的稳健性:杠杆","authors":"Ömer Öztürkoğlu","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, [9] proposed a non-traditional aisle design for unit-load warehouse for one, centrally located pickup and deposit (P&D) point both on the lower and upper sides of warehouse. We call this design Leverage. However, the number of P&D points is limited to one in design Leverage. Hence, in this research, we investigate the changes in improvement of Leverage as the number of P&D points increases by searching optimal designs by using [9]'s approach. We then compare Leverage with the improved designs to investigate its robustness in terms of changes in aisle structure and cost.","PeriodicalId":403666,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the robustness of aisles in a non-traditional unit-load warehouse design: Leverage\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Öztürkoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, [9] proposed a non-traditional aisle design for unit-load warehouse for one, centrally located pickup and deposit (P&D) point both on the lower and upper sides of warehouse. We call this design Leverage. However, the number of P&D points is limited to one in design Leverage. Hence, in this research, we investigate the changes in improvement of Leverage as the number of P&D points increases by searching optimal designs by using [9]'s approach. We then compare Leverage with the improved designs to investigate its robustness in terms of changes in aisle structure and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7257160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the robustness of aisles in a non-traditional unit-load warehouse design: Leverage
Recently, [9] proposed a non-traditional aisle design for unit-load warehouse for one, centrally located pickup and deposit (P&D) point both on the lower and upper sides of warehouse. We call this design Leverage. However, the number of P&D points is limited to one in design Leverage. Hence, in this research, we investigate the changes in improvement of Leverage as the number of P&D points increases by searching optimal designs by using [9]'s approach. We then compare Leverage with the improved designs to investigate its robustness in terms of changes in aisle structure and cost.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
