版权局面前关于版权问题的奇怪案例

Regan A. Smith
{"title":"版权局面前关于版权问题的奇怪案例","authors":"Regan A. Smith","doi":"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administering the national registration program is a core function of the Copyright Office. In most cases, determining copyrightability of a claim submitted for registration is simple, and the Office does not need to correspond over or otherwise belabor the mine run of applications to determine whether a work possesses the creative spark necessary to register a copyright interest. As the Supreme Court has noted, “the requisite level of creativity is extremely low,” and “[t]he vast majority of works make the grade quite easily.” \nSometimes, however, applied-for works invoke modes of authorship that test that standard, and the Copyright Office must resolve these claims. Applicants may contest refusals to register claims, culminating in the ability to lodge a final administrative appeal to the Copyright Office Review Board. As a member of that Board for the past four years, I’ve seen the Office apply established principles of copyrightability to a variety of dynamic claims.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curious Cases of Copyrightability Before the Copyright Office\",\"authors\":\"Regan A. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Administering the national registration program is a core function of the Copyright Office. In most cases, determining copyrightability of a claim submitted for registration is simple, and the Office does not need to correspond over or otherwise belabor the mine run of applications to determine whether a work possesses the creative spark necessary to register a copyright interest. As the Supreme Court has noted, “the requisite level of creativity is extremely low,” and “[t]he vast majority of works make the grade quite easily.” \\nSometimes, however, applied-for works invoke modes of authorship that test that standard, and the Copyright Office must resolve these claims. Applicants may contest refusals to register claims, culminating in the ability to lodge a final administrative appeal to the Copyright Office Review Board. As a member of that Board for the past four years, I’ve seen the Office apply established principles of copyrightability to a variety of dynamic claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理国家注册项目是版权局的核心职能。在大多数情况下,确定提交注册的主张的版权性很简单,并且办公室不需要对所有申请进行对应或以其他方式进行详细说明,以确定作品是否具有注册版权利益所需的创造性火花。正如最高法院所指出的那样,“创造性的必要水平极低”,而且“绝大多数作品都很容易达到要求”。然而,有时申请的作品援引了检验该标准的作者身份模式,版权局必须解决这些索赔。申请人可以对拒绝登记索赔提出异议,最终可以向版权局审查委员会提出最后的行政上诉。在过去四年中,作为该委员会的一员,我看到该办公室将既定的版权保护原则应用于各种动态索赔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Curious Cases of Copyrightability Before the Copyright Office
Administering the national registration program is a core function of the Copyright Office. In most cases, determining copyrightability of a claim submitted for registration is simple, and the Office does not need to correspond over or otherwise belabor the mine run of applications to determine whether a work possesses the creative spark necessary to register a copyright interest. As the Supreme Court has noted, “the requisite level of creativity is extremely low,” and “[t]he vast majority of works make the grade quite easily.” Sometimes, however, applied-for works invoke modes of authorship that test that standard, and the Copyright Office must resolve these claims. Applicants may contest refusals to register claims, culminating in the ability to lodge a final administrative appeal to the Copyright Office Review Board. As a member of that Board for the past four years, I’ve seen the Office apply established principles of copyrightability to a variety of dynamic claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信