将互动分析应用于支持评估和监管:一个案例研究

José Antonio Marcos-García, A. Martínez-Monés, Y. Dimitriadis, R. Anguita
{"title":"将互动分析应用于支持评估和监管:一个案例研究","authors":"José Antonio Marcos-García, A. Martínez-Monés, Y. Dimitriadis, R. Anguita","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2006.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interaction analysis has become a basic function in the field of collaborative learning, as a means for supporting both regulation and evaluation of collaborative learning processes. In spite of the fact that these processes rely on the same basic functionalities, there is a lack of proposals or systems that integrate them. The most outstanding difference between the tools that support either of the approaches is that they are oriented to different types of users. Then, an interaction analysis tool able to adapt to different roles would be able to perform both functionalities. This paper presents an experience performed in an authentic learning scenario using interaction analysis for supporting regulation for students and evaluation for teachers adapting its functionality depending on analysis needs of teacher and learners that participate in the activity. A first evaluation carried out shows that the participants assess positively this experience and consider the information received easy to understand, reliable, useful and capable to modify their way of collaboration","PeriodicalId":394051,"journal":{"name":"Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting Interaction Analysis to Support Evaluation and Regulation: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"José Antonio Marcos-García, A. Martínez-Monés, Y. Dimitriadis, R. Anguita\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT.2006.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interaction analysis has become a basic function in the field of collaborative learning, as a means for supporting both regulation and evaluation of collaborative learning processes. In spite of the fact that these processes rely on the same basic functionalities, there is a lack of proposals or systems that integrate them. The most outstanding difference between the tools that support either of the approaches is that they are oriented to different types of users. Then, an interaction analysis tool able to adapt to different roles would be able to perform both functionalities. This paper presents an experience performed in an authentic learning scenario using interaction analysis for supporting regulation for students and evaluation for teachers adapting its functionality depending on analysis needs of teacher and learners that participate in the activity. A first evaluation carried out shows that the participants assess positively this experience and consider the information received easy to understand, reliable, useful and capable to modify their way of collaboration\",\"PeriodicalId\":394051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

交互分析已成为协作学习领域的一项基本功能,是支持协作学习过程调节和评价的一种手段。尽管这些过程依赖于相同的基本功能,但缺乏将它们集成在一起的建议或系统。支持这两种方法的工具之间最显著的区别是它们面向不同类型的用户。然后,能够适应不同角色的交互分析工具将能够执行这两种功能。本文展示了在真实的学习场景中进行的体验,使用交互分析来支持学生的监管,并根据参与活动的教师和学习者的分析需求对教师进行评估,以调整其功能。第一次评估表明,参与者积极评价这一经验,并认为所收到的信息易于理解,可靠,有用,能够改变他们的合作方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adapting Interaction Analysis to Support Evaluation and Regulation: A Case Study
Interaction analysis has become a basic function in the field of collaborative learning, as a means for supporting both regulation and evaluation of collaborative learning processes. In spite of the fact that these processes rely on the same basic functionalities, there is a lack of proposals or systems that integrate them. The most outstanding difference between the tools that support either of the approaches is that they are oriented to different types of users. Then, an interaction analysis tool able to adapt to different roles would be able to perform both functionalities. This paper presents an experience performed in an authentic learning scenario using interaction analysis for supporting regulation for students and evaluation for teachers adapting its functionality depending on analysis needs of teacher and learners that participate in the activity. A first evaluation carried out shows that the participants assess positively this experience and consider the information received easy to understand, reliable, useful and capable to modify their way of collaboration
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信