在线教育中的学费敏感性

Jennings Byrd, John Roufagalas, Phillip A. Mixon
{"title":"在线教育中的学费敏感性","authors":"Jennings Byrd, John Roufagalas, Phillip A. Mixon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2402439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a price discrimination model of a university operating in two markets, online and traditional education, and attempting to maximize revenue under a minimum profit constraint. Optimality conditions, based on demand elasticities are derived. Using a dataset of 398 southeastern public two and four year higher education institutions we estimate the price elasticity of demand for both online and traditional education. Utilizing a panel framework, we find that online education (e-learning) is highly price elastic and traditional education is price inelastic. Comparison of the empirical elasticities with the model predictions indicates that universities do not behave optimally. Reduction of online tuition and increases in traditional tuition are required to move universities towards the goal of revenue maximization.","PeriodicalId":383397,"journal":{"name":"Innovation Educator: Courses","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuition Sensitivity in Online Education\",\"authors\":\"Jennings Byrd, John Roufagalas, Phillip A. Mixon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2402439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a price discrimination model of a university operating in two markets, online and traditional education, and attempting to maximize revenue under a minimum profit constraint. Optimality conditions, based on demand elasticities are derived. Using a dataset of 398 southeastern public two and four year higher education institutions we estimate the price elasticity of demand for both online and traditional education. Utilizing a panel framework, we find that online education (e-learning) is highly price elastic and traditional education is price inelastic. Comparison of the empirical elasticities with the model predictions indicates that universities do not behave optimally. Reduction of online tuition and increases in traditional tuition are required to move universities towards the goal of revenue maximization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation Educator: Courses\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation Educator: Courses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文提出了一所大学在网络教育和传统教育两个市场上运营的价格歧视模型,并试图在最小利润约束下实现收益最大化。导出了基于需求弹性的最优性条件。我们使用398个东南地区公立两年制和四年制高等教育机构的数据集,估算了在线教育和传统教育需求的价格弹性。利用面板框架,我们发现在线教育(e-learning)具有高度的价格弹性,而传统教育是价格无弹性的。实证弹性与模型预测的比较表明,大学的行为并非最优。减少网络学费和增加传统学费是推动大学实现收入最大化目标的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tuition Sensitivity in Online Education
The paper presents a price discrimination model of a university operating in two markets, online and traditional education, and attempting to maximize revenue under a minimum profit constraint. Optimality conditions, based on demand elasticities are derived. Using a dataset of 398 southeastern public two and four year higher education institutions we estimate the price elasticity of demand for both online and traditional education. Utilizing a panel framework, we find that online education (e-learning) is highly price elastic and traditional education is price inelastic. Comparison of the empirical elasticities with the model predictions indicates that universities do not behave optimally. Reduction of online tuition and increases in traditional tuition are required to move universities towards the goal of revenue maximization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信