DEFI-PROSAFE项目介绍:确定性RPV完整性评估余量的概率方法及建议基准

Ralf Tiete, R. Trewin, Sébastien Blasset, Vladislav Pištora, M. Posta, M. Niffenegger, G. Qian
{"title":"DEFI-PROSAFE项目介绍:确定性RPV完整性评估余量的概率方法及建议基准","authors":"Ralf Tiete, R. Trewin, Sébastien Blasset, Vladislav Pištora, M. Posta, M. Niffenegger, G. Qian","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the project DEFI-PROSAFE is presented.\n In the frame of Nugenia+ project, a work package was dedicated to the “DEFInition of reference case studies for harmonized PRObabilistic evaluation of SAFEty margins in integrity assessment for long-term operation of reactor pressure vessel” (acronym DEFI-PROSAFE). A methodology is proposed to assess safety margins in RPV integrity accounting for uncertainties propagation, because no commonly accepted European approach exists for probabilistic assessment of RPV fast fracture risk.\n The DEFI-PROSAFE methodology, which is based on the comparison between deterministic and probabilistic assessment, will be detailed. The experience gained from the US Screening Criteria (NUREG-1806) and past projects (ICAS, PROSIR), and guideline (IAEA TecDoc 1627) as well as aspects specific to European deterministic integrity approach have been considered. Usually for probabilistic fracture assessment of the RPV, the parameters (describing flaws, material and neutron fluence) are sampled and the RPV cylindrical region is assessed using deterministic thermal hydraulic loading for evaluation of initiation or failure conditional probability. Within DEFI-PROSAFE methodology the uncertainties in thermal-hydraulic input parameters are taken into account and their propagation in the structural assessment is considered. Comparison of RELAP5 thermal hydraulic results and mixing calculation results (KWU-MIX) with experiment relevant to PTS assessment was performed. Furthermore the DEFI-PROSAFE methodology considers RPV discontinuity regions (like RPV nozzle) and specific PIRT analysis has been performed for selection of the TH-parameters.\n A new benchmark for probabilistic assessment of RPV was defined within the DEFI-PROSAFE project. The benchmark definition and case studies based on previous R&D project (ICAS, PROSIR) will be presented. The performance of the new benchmark may be submitted as new European project.","PeriodicalId":428760,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presentation of DEFI-PROSAFE Project: Probabilistic Methodology to Assess Margin in Deterministic RPV Integrity Assessment and Proposed Benchmark\",\"authors\":\"Ralf Tiete, R. Trewin, Sébastien Blasset, Vladislav Pištora, M. Posta, M. Niffenegger, G. Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-84615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the project DEFI-PROSAFE is presented.\\n In the frame of Nugenia+ project, a work package was dedicated to the “DEFInition of reference case studies for harmonized PRObabilistic evaluation of SAFEty margins in integrity assessment for long-term operation of reactor pressure vessel” (acronym DEFI-PROSAFE). A methodology is proposed to assess safety margins in RPV integrity accounting for uncertainties propagation, because no commonly accepted European approach exists for probabilistic assessment of RPV fast fracture risk.\\n The DEFI-PROSAFE methodology, which is based on the comparison between deterministic and probabilistic assessment, will be detailed. The experience gained from the US Screening Criteria (NUREG-1806) and past projects (ICAS, PROSIR), and guideline (IAEA TecDoc 1627) as well as aspects specific to European deterministic integrity approach have been considered. Usually for probabilistic fracture assessment of the RPV, the parameters (describing flaws, material and neutron fluence) are sampled and the RPV cylindrical region is assessed using deterministic thermal hydraulic loading for evaluation of initiation or failure conditional probability. Within DEFI-PROSAFE methodology the uncertainties in thermal-hydraulic input parameters are taken into account and their propagation in the structural assessment is considered. Comparison of RELAP5 thermal hydraulic results and mixing calculation results (KWU-MIX) with experiment relevant to PTS assessment was performed. Furthermore the DEFI-PROSAFE methodology considers RPV discontinuity regions (like RPV nozzle) and specific PIRT analysis has been performed for selection of the TH-parameters.\\n A new benchmark for probabilistic assessment of RPV was defined within the DEFI-PROSAFE project. The benchmark definition and case studies based on previous R&D project (ICAS, PROSIR) will be presented. The performance of the new benchmark may be submitted as new European project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了DEFI-PROSAFE项目。在Nugenia+项目框架内,一个工作包致力于“反应堆压力容器长期运行完整性评估中安全边际协调概率评估参考案例研究的定义”(首字母缩略词DEFI-PROSAFE)。由于欧洲没有普遍接受的RPV快速断裂风险概率评估方法,因此提出了一种考虑不确定性传播的RPV完整性安全边际评估方法。DEFI-PROSAFE方法是基于确定性和概率评估之间的比较,将详细介绍。从美国筛选标准(NUREG-1806)和过去的项目(ICAS, PROSIR)和指南(IAEA TecDoc 1627)中获得的经验以及欧洲确定性完整性方法的具体方面都得到了考虑。通常在RPV的概率断裂评估中,对参数(描述缺陷、材料和中子通量)进行采样,并使用确定性热水力加载对RPV圆柱形区域进行评估,以评估起爆或破坏条件概率。在DEFI-PROSAFE方法中,考虑了热液输入参数的不确定性,并考虑了它们在结构评估中的传播。将RELAP5热水力结果和混合计算结果(KWU-MIX)与PTS评估相关实验进行比较。此外,DEFI-PROSAFE方法考虑了RPV不连续区域(如RPV喷嘴),并对th参数的选择进行了特定的PIRT分析。在DEFI-PROSAFE项目中定义了RPV概率评估的新基准。将介绍基准定义和基于以往研发项目(ICAS, PROSIR)的案例研究。新基准的表现可以作为新的欧洲项目提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presentation of DEFI-PROSAFE Project: Probabilistic Methodology to Assess Margin in Deterministic RPV Integrity Assessment and Proposed Benchmark
In this paper the project DEFI-PROSAFE is presented. In the frame of Nugenia+ project, a work package was dedicated to the “DEFInition of reference case studies for harmonized PRObabilistic evaluation of SAFEty margins in integrity assessment for long-term operation of reactor pressure vessel” (acronym DEFI-PROSAFE). A methodology is proposed to assess safety margins in RPV integrity accounting for uncertainties propagation, because no commonly accepted European approach exists for probabilistic assessment of RPV fast fracture risk. The DEFI-PROSAFE methodology, which is based on the comparison between deterministic and probabilistic assessment, will be detailed. The experience gained from the US Screening Criteria (NUREG-1806) and past projects (ICAS, PROSIR), and guideline (IAEA TecDoc 1627) as well as aspects specific to European deterministic integrity approach have been considered. Usually for probabilistic fracture assessment of the RPV, the parameters (describing flaws, material and neutron fluence) are sampled and the RPV cylindrical region is assessed using deterministic thermal hydraulic loading for evaluation of initiation or failure conditional probability. Within DEFI-PROSAFE methodology the uncertainties in thermal-hydraulic input parameters are taken into account and their propagation in the structural assessment is considered. Comparison of RELAP5 thermal hydraulic results and mixing calculation results (KWU-MIX) with experiment relevant to PTS assessment was performed. Furthermore the DEFI-PROSAFE methodology considers RPV discontinuity regions (like RPV nozzle) and specific PIRT analysis has been performed for selection of the TH-parameters. A new benchmark for probabilistic assessment of RPV was defined within the DEFI-PROSAFE project. The benchmark definition and case studies based on previous R&D project (ICAS, PROSIR) will be presented. The performance of the new benchmark may be submitted as new European project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信