配电网备选设计方案的技术经济评价

C. K. Gan, S. Y. Low, D. Pudjianto, G. Strbac
{"title":"配电网备选设计方案的技术经济评价","authors":"C. K. Gan, S. Y. Low, D. Pudjianto, G. Strbac","doi":"10.1109/PECON.2012.6450332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the methodology and distribution network model used for the assessment of alternative distribution network design strategies in terms of the cost and benefits involved. In contrast to network specific design approach, a statistical distribution network design model has been adopted in this work. The investigation into the viability of three voltage levels design (132/11/0.4kV) when compared to conventional four voltage levels design (132/33/11/0.4kV) for a typical rural case have been carried out. The technical impact and economic implications of both design options have been quantitatively evaluated and quantified.","PeriodicalId":135966,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic appraisal of alternative distribution network design options\",\"authors\":\"C. K. Gan, S. Y. Low, D. Pudjianto, G. Strbac\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PECON.2012.6450332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the methodology and distribution network model used for the assessment of alternative distribution network design strategies in terms of the cost and benefits involved. In contrast to network specific design approach, a statistical distribution network design model has been adopted in this work. The investigation into the viability of three voltage levels design (132/11/0.4kV) when compared to conventional four voltage levels design (132/33/11/0.4kV) for a typical rural case have been carried out. The technical impact and economic implications of both design options have been quantitatively evaluated and quantified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PECON.2012.6450332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PECON.2012.6450332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从成本和效益的角度出发,提出了一种用于评估配电网设计策略的方法和配电网模型。与网络特定设计方法不同,本文采用了统计分布网络设计模型。以典型农村为例,对比分析了三电压电平设计(132/33/11/0.4kV)与传统四电压电平设计(132/33/11/0.4kV)的可行性。对两种设计方案的技术影响和经济影响进行了定量评价和量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techno-economic appraisal of alternative distribution network design options
This paper presents the methodology and distribution network model used for the assessment of alternative distribution network design strategies in terms of the cost and benefits involved. In contrast to network specific design approach, a statistical distribution network design model has been adopted in this work. The investigation into the viability of three voltage levels design (132/11/0.4kV) when compared to conventional four voltage levels design (132/33/11/0.4kV) for a typical rural case have been carried out. The technical impact and economic implications of both design options have been quantitatively evaluated and quantified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信