Rommel Velastegui, Fernanda Flores, Diana Velastegui, Cristina Bel Fenellós, M. V. García
{"title":"9 ~ 11岁儿童选择性注意评价(短文)","authors":"Rommel Velastegui, Fernanda Flores, Diana Velastegui, Cristina Bel Fenellós, M. V. García","doi":"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- The study proposes an analysis of selective attention in a population of students between 9 and 11 years old, for the evaluation process the stroop test has been used, the proposed activity is important for their learning process because they are training and neurological development; The study proposes a population of 135 students from various educational units of the Ambato canton, Ecuador; obtaining results: 127 (94%) students had a positive score equivalent to “Normal attention”, said students have adequately inhibited the automatic response found in the reagent; and on the other hand, 8 (6%) students obtain negative evaluations, which means that they have “attention deficit” due to different factors specific to each one that will be analyzed later.","PeriodicalId":369305,"journal":{"name":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of selective attention in 9- to-11-year-old children (short paper)\",\"authors\":\"Rommel Velastegui, Fernanda Flores, Diana Velastegui, Cristina Bel Fenellós, M. V. García\",\"doi\":\"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- The study proposes an analysis of selective attention in a population of students between 9 and 11 years old, for the evaluation process the stroop test has been used, the proposed activity is important for their learning process because they are training and neurological development; The study proposes a population of 135 students from various educational units of the Ambato canton, Ecuador; obtaining results: 127 (94%) students had a positive score equivalent to “Normal attention”, said students have adequately inhibited the automatic response found in the reagent; and on the other hand, 8 (6%) students obtain negative evaluations, which means that they have “attention deficit” due to different factors specific to each one that will be analyzed later.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of selective attention in 9- to-11-year-old children (short paper)
- The study proposes an analysis of selective attention in a population of students between 9 and 11 years old, for the evaluation process the stroop test has been used, the proposed activity is important for their learning process because they are training and neurological development; The study proposes a population of 135 students from various educational units of the Ambato canton, Ecuador; obtaining results: 127 (94%) students had a positive score equivalent to “Normal attention”, said students have adequately inhibited the automatic response found in the reagent; and on the other hand, 8 (6%) students obtain negative evaluations, which means that they have “attention deficit” due to different factors specific to each one that will be analyzed later.