评估井下和井口压缩对具有液体负载问题的气井优化生产的影响的详细研究:ADNOC陆上气田案例研究

B. Bernadi, Mahmoud M. Douglas, Alia Belal Zuwaid Belal Al Shamsi, Fatima Omar Alawadhi, Ihab Nabil Mohamed, Mariam Ahmed Hosani, Ahmed Mohamed Al Bairaq, A. Abdullayev, Allen Roopal
{"title":"评估井下和井口压缩对具有液体负载问题的气井优化生产的影响的详细研究:ADNOC陆上气田案例研究","authors":"B. Bernadi, Mahmoud M. Douglas, Alia Belal Zuwaid Belal Al Shamsi, Fatima Omar Alawadhi, Ihab Nabil Mohamed, Mariam Ahmed Hosani, Ahmed Mohamed Al Bairaq, A. Abdullayev, Allen Roopal","doi":"10.2118/212677-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An onshore retrograde gas field in Abu Dhabi has several wells with severe liquid loading issue as reflected by low intermittent production rates. To overcome this, a study was performed by looking at the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compression and their impact on the production rates. Utilizing IAM, the benefit will not only be seen at the well level but also at the field scale with the ultimate goal to increase the Recovery Factor.\n The study was started by identifying the wells suffering from liquid loading issue. The wells were then ranked according to the severity of the problem based on the GLR values. Hence, the top 2 wells were prioritized as the candidates. Both the downhole and wellhead compressors were then modelled in IAM and several sensitivity runs were performed to evaluate the optimum compressor settings to see the impact on flow stabilization and wells productivity. The selected best scenarios were also compared with the base case as reference where no intervention was performed at all (natural flow).\n The study reveals that both downhole and wellhead compression can give wells flowrate stability with substantial improvement on the production rates for longer duration of time compared to the base case scenario. More than that, the downhole compression shows better gain for production rates compared to the wellhead compression. This is mainly attributed to the fact that gas density is higher at the bottom of the well than at the surface and since the mass flow rate depends on the density of the gas and the volumetric flow rate, this will lead to higher mass flow rate for the same volumetric flow. Consequently, a downhole compressor will produce more fluid quantity rather than a wellhead compressor.\n The study clearly demonstrates and evaluates the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compressors to mitigate liquid loading inclusively to improve gas wells production. By utilizing IAM that is capable to capture the interactions between subsurface to surface network elements, the improvements on wells deliverability after implementing downhole and/or wellhead compression can be accounted more accurately taking into account more complex production operations with the ultimate goal to maximize the field Recovery Factor.","PeriodicalId":215106,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Detail Study Evaluating the Impact of Downhole and Wellhead Compression to Optimize Production From Gas Wells with Liquid Loading Issue: An ADNOC Onshore Gas Field Case Study\",\"authors\":\"B. Bernadi, Mahmoud M. Douglas, Alia Belal Zuwaid Belal Al Shamsi, Fatima Omar Alawadhi, Ihab Nabil Mohamed, Mariam Ahmed Hosani, Ahmed Mohamed Al Bairaq, A. Abdullayev, Allen Roopal\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212677-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n An onshore retrograde gas field in Abu Dhabi has several wells with severe liquid loading issue as reflected by low intermittent production rates. To overcome this, a study was performed by looking at the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compression and their impact on the production rates. Utilizing IAM, the benefit will not only be seen at the well level but also at the field scale with the ultimate goal to increase the Recovery Factor.\\n The study was started by identifying the wells suffering from liquid loading issue. The wells were then ranked according to the severity of the problem based on the GLR values. Hence, the top 2 wells were prioritized as the candidates. Both the downhole and wellhead compressors were then modelled in IAM and several sensitivity runs were performed to evaluate the optimum compressor settings to see the impact on flow stabilization and wells productivity. The selected best scenarios were also compared with the base case as reference where no intervention was performed at all (natural flow).\\n The study reveals that both downhole and wellhead compression can give wells flowrate stability with substantial improvement on the production rates for longer duration of time compared to the base case scenario. More than that, the downhole compression shows better gain for production rates compared to the wellhead compression. This is mainly attributed to the fact that gas density is higher at the bottom of the well than at the surface and since the mass flow rate depends on the density of the gas and the volumetric flow rate, this will lead to higher mass flow rate for the same volumetric flow. Consequently, a downhole compressor will produce more fluid quantity rather than a wellhead compressor.\\n The study clearly demonstrates and evaluates the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compressors to mitigate liquid loading inclusively to improve gas wells production. By utilizing IAM that is capable to capture the interactions between subsurface to surface network elements, the improvements on wells deliverability after implementing downhole and/or wellhead compression can be accounted more accurately taking into account more complex production operations with the ultimate goal to maximize the field Recovery Factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212677-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, January 25, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212677-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿布扎比的一个陆上逆行气田有几口井存在严重的液体负荷问题,间歇性产量低。为了解决这个问题,研究人员对井下和井口压缩的有效性及其对产量的影响进行了研究。利用IAM,不仅可以在井级上看到效益,还可以在油田规模上看到效益,最终目标是提高采收率。该研究首先确定了存在液体加载问题的井。然后根据问题的严重程度根据GLR值对井进行排序。因此,前2口井被优先考虑为候选井。然后在IAM中对井下和井口压缩机进行建模,并进行了几次敏感性运行,以评估最佳压缩机设置,以了解对流动稳定和油井产能的影响。选择的最佳方案也与基准情况进行了比较,作为参考,根本没有进行干预(自然流)。研究表明,与基本情况相比,井下和井口压缩都可以使井的流量稳定,并在更长的时间内显著提高产量。不仅如此,与井口压缩相比,井下压缩显示出更好的产量增益。这主要是由于井底的气体密度高于地面,由于质量流量取决于气体密度和体积流量,这将导致相同体积流量的质量流量更高。因此,井下压缩机比井口压缩机产生更多的流体量。该研究清楚地证明并评估了井下和井口压缩机在减轻液体负荷以提高气井产量方面的有效性。通过使用IAM,能够捕捉地下与地面网络元素之间的相互作用,在实施井下和/或井口压缩后,可以更准确地考虑到更复杂的生产操作,最终目标是最大化油田采收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Detail Study Evaluating the Impact of Downhole and Wellhead Compression to Optimize Production From Gas Wells with Liquid Loading Issue: An ADNOC Onshore Gas Field Case Study
An onshore retrograde gas field in Abu Dhabi has several wells with severe liquid loading issue as reflected by low intermittent production rates. To overcome this, a study was performed by looking at the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compression and their impact on the production rates. Utilizing IAM, the benefit will not only be seen at the well level but also at the field scale with the ultimate goal to increase the Recovery Factor. The study was started by identifying the wells suffering from liquid loading issue. The wells were then ranked according to the severity of the problem based on the GLR values. Hence, the top 2 wells were prioritized as the candidates. Both the downhole and wellhead compressors were then modelled in IAM and several sensitivity runs were performed to evaluate the optimum compressor settings to see the impact on flow stabilization and wells productivity. The selected best scenarios were also compared with the base case as reference where no intervention was performed at all (natural flow). The study reveals that both downhole and wellhead compression can give wells flowrate stability with substantial improvement on the production rates for longer duration of time compared to the base case scenario. More than that, the downhole compression shows better gain for production rates compared to the wellhead compression. This is mainly attributed to the fact that gas density is higher at the bottom of the well than at the surface and since the mass flow rate depends on the density of the gas and the volumetric flow rate, this will lead to higher mass flow rate for the same volumetric flow. Consequently, a downhole compressor will produce more fluid quantity rather than a wellhead compressor. The study clearly demonstrates and evaluates the effectiveness of downhole and wellhead compressors to mitigate liquid loading inclusively to improve gas wells production. By utilizing IAM that is capable to capture the interactions between subsurface to surface network elements, the improvements on wells deliverability after implementing downhole and/or wellhead compression can be accounted more accurately taking into account more complex production operations with the ultimate goal to maximize the field Recovery Factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信