澳大利亚听力协会多记忆助听器配装指南的临床评价

G. Keidser, Heidi Silberstein Limareff, S. Simmons, Corina Gul, Zoe Hayes, C. Sawers, Bronwyn Thomas, K. Holland, Kelly Korchek
{"title":"澳大利亚听力协会多记忆助听器配装指南的临床评价","authors":"G. Keidser, Heidi Silberstein Limareff, S. Simmons, Corina Gul, Zoe Hayes, C. Sawers, Bronwyn Thomas, K. Holland, Kelly Korchek","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1998, guidelines for fitting multi-memory hearing aids were introduced in Australian Hearing (a government agency). The guidelines list criteria for determining multimemory candidacy and present recommended response variations around a baseline response to suit different listening environments. This study aimed at validating the clinical application of the guidelines. Forty-four subjects from three Australian Hearing centres evaluated a digital, two-memory, two-channel compression device with remote control in their everyday environments for four months. Data suggested that the original criteria for candidacy were not satisfactory. On average, candidates had a wider dynamic range across the high frequencies, were more often in the situation the alternative program was designed for, and were fitted with a greater low-frequency gain difference between programs. A revised candidacy guideline based on this finding is presented. The recommended response variations were difficult to achieve and data did not suggest any particular changes to the recommended response variations.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Evaluation of Australian Hearing's Guidelines for Fitting Multiple Memory Hearing Aids\",\"authors\":\"G. Keidser, Heidi Silberstein Limareff, S. Simmons, Corina Gul, Zoe Hayes, C. Sawers, Bronwyn Thomas, K. Holland, Kelly Korchek\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1998, guidelines for fitting multi-memory hearing aids were introduced in Australian Hearing (a government agency). The guidelines list criteria for determining multimemory candidacy and present recommended response variations around a baseline response to suit different listening environments. This study aimed at validating the clinical application of the guidelines. Forty-four subjects from three Australian Hearing centres evaluated a digital, two-memory, two-channel compression device with remote control in their everyday environments for four months. Data suggested that the original criteria for candidacy were not satisfactory. On average, candidates had a wider dynamic range across the high frequencies, were more often in the situation the alternative program was designed for, and were fitted with a greater low-frequency gain difference between programs. A revised candidacy guideline based on this finding is presented. The recommended response variations were difficult to achieve and data did not suggest any particular changes to the recommended response variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

1998年,澳大利亚听力协会(一个政府机构)推出了多记忆体助听器的安装指南。该指南列出了确定多记忆候选性的标准,并围绕基线响应提出了适合不同听力环境的建议响应变化。本研究旨在验证该指南的临床应用。来自澳大利亚三个听力中心的44名受试者在四个月的日常环境中评估了一种数字、双记忆、双通道的远程控制压缩装置。数据显示,最初的候选资格标准并不令人满意。平均而言,候选人在高频上具有更宽的动态范围,更经常处于替代程序设计的情况下,并且在程序之间具有更大的低频增益差异。根据这一发现提出了一项修订的候选资格指南。建议的反应变化很难实现,数据也没有表明对建议的反应变化有任何特别的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Evaluation of Australian Hearing's Guidelines for Fitting Multiple Memory Hearing Aids
In 1998, guidelines for fitting multi-memory hearing aids were introduced in Australian Hearing (a government agency). The guidelines list criteria for determining multimemory candidacy and present recommended response variations around a baseline response to suit different listening environments. This study aimed at validating the clinical application of the guidelines. Forty-four subjects from three Australian Hearing centres evaluated a digital, two-memory, two-channel compression device with remote control in their everyday environments for four months. Data suggested that the original criteria for candidacy were not satisfactory. On average, candidates had a wider dynamic range across the high frequencies, were more often in the situation the alternative program was designed for, and were fitted with a greater low-frequency gain difference between programs. A revised candidacy guideline based on this finding is presented. The recommended response variations were difficult to achieve and data did not suggest any particular changes to the recommended response variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信