反思1829年

E. Exner
{"title":"反思1829年","authors":"E. Exner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190943899.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy’s 1829 Berlin performance of Bach’s St. Matthew Passion is one of music history’s most legendary events, often cited as the origin of the “Bach Revival.” The historical record makes it clear, though, that Mendelssohn did not single-handedly rediscover Bach or his Passion and that his concert was not the first, even in Berlin, to feature Bach’s sacred vocal music. Nevertheless, the legend persists. This chapter re-examines the sources in search of a more inclusive view of Bach’s reception history in Berlin. In addition, it argues that the rhetoric of legend has endured in spite of the facts because it trades in the reassuring vocabulary of myth. The belief that Mendelssohn’s 1829 concert was a sudden and miraculous rediscovery cannot stand up to the facts, but the traditional story better serves the master narrative of German cultural hegemony in which Bach has played such an essential role.","PeriodicalId":355356,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Bach","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking 1829\",\"authors\":\"E. Exner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190943899.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy’s 1829 Berlin performance of Bach’s St. Matthew Passion is one of music history’s most legendary events, often cited as the origin of the “Bach Revival.” The historical record makes it clear, though, that Mendelssohn did not single-handedly rediscover Bach or his Passion and that his concert was not the first, even in Berlin, to feature Bach’s sacred vocal music. Nevertheless, the legend persists. This chapter re-examines the sources in search of a more inclusive view of Bach’s reception history in Berlin. In addition, it argues that the rhetoric of legend has endured in spite of the facts because it trades in the reassuring vocabulary of myth. The belief that Mendelssohn’s 1829 concert was a sudden and miraculous rediscovery cannot stand up to the facts, but the traditional story better serves the master narrative of German cultural hegemony in which Bach has played such an essential role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Bach\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Bach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190943899.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Bach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190943899.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

菲利克斯·门德尔松·巴托尔迪于1829年在柏林演出巴赫的《马太受难曲》,这是音乐史上最具传奇色彩的事件之一,经常被认为是“巴赫复兴”的起源。然而,历史记录清楚地表明,门德尔松并不是独自一人重新发现巴赫或他的激情,他的音乐会也不是第一次以巴赫神圣的声乐为特色,即使在柏林。尽管如此,这个传说仍然流传着。本章重新审视了巴赫在柏林接受历史的来源,以寻找一个更具包容性的观点。此外,它还认为,尽管事实如此,传说的修辞仍然存在,因为它用神话的令人安心的词汇进行了交易。认为门德尔松1829年的音乐会是一次突然的奇迹般的再发现,这是站不住事实的,但传统的故事更符合德国文化霸权的主要叙述,巴赫在其中发挥了至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking 1829
Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy’s 1829 Berlin performance of Bach’s St. Matthew Passion is one of music history’s most legendary events, often cited as the origin of the “Bach Revival.” The historical record makes it clear, though, that Mendelssohn did not single-handedly rediscover Bach or his Passion and that his concert was not the first, even in Berlin, to feature Bach’s sacred vocal music. Nevertheless, the legend persists. This chapter re-examines the sources in search of a more inclusive view of Bach’s reception history in Berlin. In addition, it argues that the rhetoric of legend has endured in spite of the facts because it trades in the reassuring vocabulary of myth. The belief that Mendelssohn’s 1829 concert was a sudden and miraculous rediscovery cannot stand up to the facts, but the traditional story better serves the master narrative of German cultural hegemony in which Bach has played such an essential role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信