为JIT协调订货和生产政策:讨价还价能力分析

Zhou Xin, Jiazhen Huo
{"title":"为JIT协调订货和生产政策:讨价还价能力分析","authors":"Zhou Xin, Jiazhen Huo","doi":"10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In decentralized-decision making process, the buyer's EOQ solution was often unacceptable to the supplier, while the supplier ELS solution was undesirable to the buyer. Based on an integrated JIT inventory model, bargain power structures of buyer and supplier were analyzed to yield the JIT policy accepted by both parties. Two typical cases, supplier's dominance and buyer's dominance were included into more general quantitative bargain power analysis. Traditional single-order-single-delivery model was extended into JIT single-order-multiple-delivery (SSMD) model. A numerical example was given to show how optimal policies and system costs changed with two parties' bargain power factor, and made a comparison with the results joint optimal policy.","PeriodicalId":249102,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coordinating ordering and production polices for JIT: Bargain power analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhou Xin, Jiazhen Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In decentralized-decision making process, the buyer's EOQ solution was often unacceptable to the supplier, while the supplier ELS solution was undesirable to the buyer. Based on an integrated JIT inventory model, bargain power structures of buyer and supplier were analyzed to yield the JIT policy accepted by both parties. Two typical cases, supplier's dominance and buyer's dominance were included into more general quantitative bargain power analysis. Traditional single-order-single-delivery model was extended into JIT single-order-multiple-delivery (SSMD) model. A numerical example was given to show how optimal policies and system costs changed with two parties' bargain power factor, and made a comparison with the results joint optimal policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在分散决策过程中,买方的EOQ方案往往不为供应商所接受,而供应商的ELS方案往往不为买方所接受。基于集成的JIT库存模型,分析了买方和供应商的议价权结构,得出了双方都能接受的JIT策略。两个典型的案例,供应商优势和买方优势被纳入更一般的定量议价能力分析。将传统的单单交付模型扩展为单单多交付(SSMD)模型。给出了一个算例,说明了最优策略和系统成本随双方讨价还价功率因子的变化规律,并与联合最优策略的结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coordinating ordering and production polices for JIT: Bargain power analysis
In decentralized-decision making process, the buyer's EOQ solution was often unacceptable to the supplier, while the supplier ELS solution was undesirable to the buyer. Based on an integrated JIT inventory model, bargain power structures of buyer and supplier were analyzed to yield the JIT policy accepted by both parties. Two typical cases, supplier's dominance and buyer's dominance were included into more general quantitative bargain power analysis. Traditional single-order-single-delivery model was extended into JIT single-order-multiple-delivery (SSMD) model. A numerical example was given to show how optimal policies and system costs changed with two parties' bargain power factor, and made a comparison with the results joint optimal policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信