通过逐步模型转换的软件架构设计:一个比较案例研究

Fabian Gilson, V. Englebert
{"title":"通过逐步模型转换的软件架构设计:一个比较案例研究","authors":"Fabian Gilson, V. Englebert","doi":"10.5220/0005266101340145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software architecture design is a critical task as lots of requirements can be taken into account on which many decisions can be made. The maintenance and evolution of resulting models often become tricky, even impracticable when their rationale is lost. In a previous work, we introduced a set of languages used in a transformation-centric design method meant to tackle this scattering of requirements and to facilitate further model evolutions. But, we did not provided a formal validation of our proposal yet. The present work depicts a comparative case study we conducted on a group of students. The participants were asked to develop an online book store in two phases, the second one simulating an evolution of the system. We evaluated the functional completeness of the created software as well as the traceability of design decisions and rationale. The participants were also asked to criticize the design method and language they used in a textual report and through a questionnaire. Even if the size of the case study is rather limited, it clearly highlighs the advantages of our approach regarding, among others, its expressiveness and decisions traceability.","PeriodicalId":256976,"journal":{"name":"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software architecture design by stepwise model transformations: A comparative case study\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Gilson, V. Englebert\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005266101340145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software architecture design is a critical task as lots of requirements can be taken into account on which many decisions can be made. The maintenance and evolution of resulting models often become tricky, even impracticable when their rationale is lost. In a previous work, we introduced a set of languages used in a transformation-centric design method meant to tackle this scattering of requirements and to facilitate further model evolutions. But, we did not provided a formal validation of our proposal yet. The present work depicts a comparative case study we conducted on a group of students. The participants were asked to develop an online book store in two phases, the second one simulating an evolution of the system. We evaluated the functional completeness of the created software as well as the traceability of design decisions and rationale. The participants were also asked to criticize the design method and language they used in a textual report and through a questionnaire. Even if the size of the case study is rather limited, it clearly highlighs the advantages of our approach regarding, among others, its expressiveness and decisions traceability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005266101340145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005266101340145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

软件架构设计是一项关键任务,因为可以考虑到许多需求,从而可以做出许多决策。结果模型的维护和进化常常变得棘手,甚至在失去基本原理时变得不切实际。在之前的工作中,我们介绍了一组以转换为中心的设计方法中使用的语言,旨在处理需求的分散,并促进进一步的模型演进。但是,我们还没有对我们的建议提供正式的验证。本工作描述了我们对一组学生进行的比较案例研究。参与者被要求分两个阶段开发一个在线书店,第二个阶段模拟系统的进化。我们评估了所创建软件的功能完整性,以及设计决策和基本原理的可追溯性。参与者还被要求在文本报告和问卷调查中批评他们使用的设计方法和语言。即使案例研究的规模相当有限,它也清楚地突出了我们的方法的优点,其中包括它的表现力和决策可追溯性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software architecture design by stepwise model transformations: A comparative case study
Software architecture design is a critical task as lots of requirements can be taken into account on which many decisions can be made. The maintenance and evolution of resulting models often become tricky, even impracticable when their rationale is lost. In a previous work, we introduced a set of languages used in a transformation-centric design method meant to tackle this scattering of requirements and to facilitate further model evolutions. But, we did not provided a formal validation of our proposal yet. The present work depicts a comparative case study we conducted on a group of students. The participants were asked to develop an online book store in two phases, the second one simulating an evolution of the system. We evaluated the functional completeness of the created software as well as the traceability of design decisions and rationale. The participants were also asked to criticize the design method and language they used in a textual report and through a questionnaire. Even if the size of the case study is rather limited, it clearly highlighs the advantages of our approach regarding, among others, its expressiveness and decisions traceability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信