修复:一段新的历史

Harriet S Hughes
{"title":"修复:一段新的历史","authors":"Harriet S Hughes","doi":"10.1093/camqtly/bfac032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"poetry and ethics – Peter McDonald’s Serious Poetry (2002), for instance, or David-Antoine Williams’s Defending Poetry (2010) – are stronger on historical and literary-critical detail, Vincent’s book brings into view the important theoretical background to the consideration of lyric poems as ethical exemplars. Part of the point, however, is that poems, as Vincent recognises, also offer modes of thinking firmly resistant to this kind of analysis. Crucially, ‘Ars’ concludes with a return to the first person singular, an ‘I’ which is not necessarily a ‘we’. At stake in the poem may be an underlying ‘exemplary’ method, a form which reaches outward to a wider public. But there is more than this here too, the moral imagination suddenly capturing what for the poet – and perhaps only for one brief moment – really is so:","PeriodicalId":374258,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Quarterly","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repair: A New History\",\"authors\":\"Harriet S Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/camqtly/bfac032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"poetry and ethics – Peter McDonald’s Serious Poetry (2002), for instance, or David-Antoine Williams’s Defending Poetry (2010) – are stronger on historical and literary-critical detail, Vincent’s book brings into view the important theoretical background to the consideration of lyric poems as ethical exemplars. Part of the point, however, is that poems, as Vincent recognises, also offer modes of thinking firmly resistant to this kind of analysis. Crucially, ‘Ars’ concludes with a return to the first person singular, an ‘I’ which is not necessarily a ‘we’. At stake in the poem may be an underlying ‘exemplary’ method, a form which reaches outward to a wider public. But there is more than this here too, the moral imagination suddenly capturing what for the poet – and perhaps only for one brief moment – really is so:\",\"PeriodicalId\":374258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cambridge Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfac032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfac032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诗歌和伦理学——例如,彼得·麦克唐纳的《严肃的诗歌》(2002),或者大卫·安托万·威廉姆斯的《捍卫诗歌》(2010)——更注重历史和文学批评的细节,文森特的书将抒情诗歌作为伦理典范的重要理论背景带入了人们的视野。然而,正如文森特所认识到的,诗歌也提供了一种坚决抵制这种分析的思维模式。至关重要的是,“Ars”以第一人称单数的形式结束,而“I”不一定是“we”。这首诗的关键可能是一种潜在的“模范”方法,一种向外传播到更广泛公众的形式。但这里还有更多的东西,道德想象力突然捕捉到诗人的真实情况——也许只是短暂的一刻:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repair: A New History
poetry and ethics – Peter McDonald’s Serious Poetry (2002), for instance, or David-Antoine Williams’s Defending Poetry (2010) – are stronger on historical and literary-critical detail, Vincent’s book brings into view the important theoretical background to the consideration of lyric poems as ethical exemplars. Part of the point, however, is that poems, as Vincent recognises, also offer modes of thinking firmly resistant to this kind of analysis. Crucially, ‘Ars’ concludes with a return to the first person singular, an ‘I’ which is not necessarily a ‘we’. At stake in the poem may be an underlying ‘exemplary’ method, a form which reaches outward to a wider public. But there is more than this here too, the moral imagination suddenly capturing what for the poet – and perhaps only for one brief moment – really is so:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信