用中间模型简化融合乘加单元的C-RTL等效校核

Bin Xue, Prosenjit Chatterjee, S. Shukla
{"title":"用中间模型简化融合乘加单元的C-RTL等效校核","authors":"Bin Xue, Prosenjit Chatterjee, S. Shukla","doi":"10.1109/ASPDAC.2013.6509686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The functionality of Fused multiply add (FMA) design can be formally verified by comparing its register transition level (RTL) implementation against its system level specification often modeled by C/C++ language using sequential equivalent checking (SEC). However, C-RTL SEC does not scale for FMA because of the huge discrepancy existed between the two models. This paper analyzes the dissimilarities and proposes two intermediate models, one abstract RTL and one rewritten C model to bridge the gap. The original SEC proof are partitioned into three sub-proofs among intermediate models where a variety of simplification techniques are applied to further reduce the complexity. Experiments from an industry project show that with the two intermediate models, the SEC proof is complete and scalable for FMA design.","PeriodicalId":297528,"journal":{"name":"2013 18th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","volume":"0510 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplification of C-RTL equivalent checking for fused multiply add unit using intermediate models\",\"authors\":\"Bin Xue, Prosenjit Chatterjee, S. Shukla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASPDAC.2013.6509686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The functionality of Fused multiply add (FMA) design can be formally verified by comparing its register transition level (RTL) implementation against its system level specification often modeled by C/C++ language using sequential equivalent checking (SEC). However, C-RTL SEC does not scale for FMA because of the huge discrepancy existed between the two models. This paper analyzes the dissimilarities and proposes two intermediate models, one abstract RTL and one rewritten C model to bridge the gap. The original SEC proof are partitioned into three sub-proofs among intermediate models where a variety of simplification techniques are applied to further reduce the complexity. Experiments from an industry project show that with the two intermediate models, the SEC proof is complete and scalable for FMA design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 18th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"volume\":\"0510 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 18th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.2013.6509686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 18th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.2013.6509686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

融合乘加(FMA)设计的功能可以通过比较其寄存器转换级(RTL)实现与系统级规范(通常由C/ c++语言使用顺序等效检查(SEC)建模)进行形式化验证。然而,由于两种模型之间存在巨大的差异,C-RTL SEC不适合FMA。本文分析了两者之间的差异,提出了两种中间模型,一种是抽象的RTL模型,另一种是重写的C模型。原始证交会证明在中间模型中被划分为三个子证明,并应用了各种简化技术来进一步降低复杂性。一个工业项目的实验表明,使用这两个中间模型,SEC证明是完整的,并且可扩展用于FMA设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplification of C-RTL equivalent checking for fused multiply add unit using intermediate models
The functionality of Fused multiply add (FMA) design can be formally verified by comparing its register transition level (RTL) implementation against its system level specification often modeled by C/C++ language using sequential equivalent checking (SEC). However, C-RTL SEC does not scale for FMA because of the huge discrepancy existed between the two models. This paper analyzes the dissimilarities and proposes two intermediate models, one abstract RTL and one rewritten C model to bridge the gap. The original SEC proof are partitioned into three sub-proofs among intermediate models where a variety of simplification techniques are applied to further reduce the complexity. Experiments from an industry project show that with the two intermediate models, the SEC proof is complete and scalable for FMA design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信