制度逻辑视角:解释管理会计实务变迁的理论框架

Taslima Nasreen, R. Baker
{"title":"制度逻辑视角:解释管理会计实务变迁的理论框架","authors":"Taslima Nasreen, R. Baker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3318737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical studies suggest that management accounting practice is shaped and reshaped by both intra, inter, and extra organizational norms, values, and assumptions. There is still a dearth of study to explore how and at which stage various extra-organizational factors, such as societal-level and field-level institutions, filters organizational norms and practice and then blended into the organizational rules and routines formation process. This paper combines insights from the Old Institutional Economics (OIE) and Institutional Logics Perspectives (ILPs) of Neo-Institutional Sociology (NIS) of institutionalization with the emerging practice-based literature on organizational stability and change to offer a modified version of the institutional framework of management accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens (2000). This modified Burns and Scapens (2000) framework allows the future research in exploring the influence of the concurrent interplay mechanisms between the prevailing inter-institutional logic and dominant organizational logic in the process of management accounting practice stability and change.","PeriodicalId":274826,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Institutional Logic Perspective: A Theoretical Framework in Explaining Management Accounting Practice Change\",\"authors\":\"Taslima Nasreen, R. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3318737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical studies suggest that management accounting practice is shaped and reshaped by both intra, inter, and extra organizational norms, values, and assumptions. There is still a dearth of study to explore how and at which stage various extra-organizational factors, such as societal-level and field-level institutions, filters organizational norms and practice and then blended into the organizational rules and routines formation process. This paper combines insights from the Old Institutional Economics (OIE) and Institutional Logics Perspectives (ILPs) of Neo-Institutional Sociology (NIS) of institutionalization with the emerging practice-based literature on organizational stability and change to offer a modified version of the institutional framework of management accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens (2000). This modified Burns and Scapens (2000) framework allows the future research in exploring the influence of the concurrent interplay mechanisms between the prevailing inter-institutional logic and dominant organizational logic in the process of management accounting practice stability and change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实证研究表明,管理会计实践是由内部、内部和外部组织规范、价值观和假设塑造和重塑的。关于各种组织外因素,如社会层面和领域层面的机构,如何以及在哪个阶段过滤组织规范和实践,然后融入组织规则和惯例形成过程的研究仍然缺乏。本文结合了旧制度经济学(OIE)和新制度社会学(NIS)关于制度化的制度逻辑视角(ILPs)的见解,以及新兴的基于实践的组织稳定性和变革文献,提供了Burns和Scapens(2000)开发的管理会计变革制度框架的修改版本。这一改进的Burns和Scapens(2000)框架允许未来的研究探索在管理会计实践的稳定和变化过程中,占主导地位的机构间逻辑和占主导地位的组织逻辑之间的并发相互作用机制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Institutional Logic Perspective: A Theoretical Framework in Explaining Management Accounting Practice Change
Empirical studies suggest that management accounting practice is shaped and reshaped by both intra, inter, and extra organizational norms, values, and assumptions. There is still a dearth of study to explore how and at which stage various extra-organizational factors, such as societal-level and field-level institutions, filters organizational norms and practice and then blended into the organizational rules and routines formation process. This paper combines insights from the Old Institutional Economics (OIE) and Institutional Logics Perspectives (ILPs) of Neo-Institutional Sociology (NIS) of institutionalization with the emerging practice-based literature on organizational stability and change to offer a modified version of the institutional framework of management accounting change developed by Burns and Scapens (2000). This modified Burns and Scapens (2000) framework allows the future research in exploring the influence of the concurrent interplay mechanisms between the prevailing inter-institutional logic and dominant organizational logic in the process of management accounting practice stability and change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信