移动社会性方面

D. Morley
{"title":"移动社会性方面","authors":"D. Morley","doi":"10.4324/9781003089872-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter offers a meta-commentary on the concept of mobile socialites, and on claims that the new technologies of our globalised age have ushered in a borderless world of unprecedented rates of mobility and time-space compression. That vision of how Progress is driven by improvements in the efficiency of transport and communication is here placed in historical context, in an attempt to avoid the dangers of an unself-conscious focus on the present day. The analysis addresses questions concerning how ideas of home and community need to be adapted in the context of contemporary changes in patterns of communication and physical mobility and the changing relations of virtual and material geographies. It focusses on differential mobilities, the politics of waiting - and exclusion- and the continuing significance of place-based modes of sociality. It also discusses the fate of those populations who, rather than exploring any kind of mobile sociality, are increasingly retreating behind sedentarist, particularistic boundaries. The chapter investigates how these desires to to regain some sense of security in a world of flux have provided the seed-bed for the contemporary forms of populism. In conclusion, the argument also considers how the Covid-19 pandemic is reshaping previous debates about both mobility and sociality. Presumptions about the unquestioned value of increased speeds of circulation take on a quite different hue in a context in which the dominant rhetoric is necessarily now one of social distancing and boundary regulation.","PeriodicalId":360225,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Socialities\",\"authors\":\"D. Morley\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003089872-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter offers a meta-commentary on the concept of mobile socialites, and on claims that the new technologies of our globalised age have ushered in a borderless world of unprecedented rates of mobility and time-space compression. That vision of how Progress is driven by improvements in the efficiency of transport and communication is here placed in historical context, in an attempt to avoid the dangers of an unself-conscious focus on the present day. The analysis addresses questions concerning how ideas of home and community need to be adapted in the context of contemporary changes in patterns of communication and physical mobility and the changing relations of virtual and material geographies. It focusses on differential mobilities, the politics of waiting - and exclusion- and the continuing significance of place-based modes of sociality. It also discusses the fate of those populations who, rather than exploring any kind of mobile sociality, are increasingly retreating behind sedentarist, particularistic boundaries. The chapter investigates how these desires to to regain some sense of security in a world of flux have provided the seed-bed for the contemporary forms of populism. In conclusion, the argument also considers how the Covid-19 pandemic is reshaping previous debates about both mobility and sociality. Presumptions about the unquestioned value of increased speeds of circulation take on a quite different hue in a context in which the dominant rhetoric is necessarily now one of social distancing and boundary regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089872-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003089872-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这一章提供了对移动社交概念的元评论,以及关于我们全球化时代的新技术带来了一个前所未有的流动性和时空压缩的无国界世界的说法。这种关于进步是如何由运输和通讯效率的提高所驱动的观点,在这里被置于历史背景中,以避免不自觉地关注当下的危险。该分析涉及的问题是,家庭和社区的概念需要如何适应当代通信和物理流动模式的变化以及虚拟地理和物质地理之间不断变化的关系。它关注的是不同的流动性,等待和排斥的政治,以及基于地点的社会模式的持续意义。它还讨论了那些不愿探索任何形式的移动社会,而是越来越多地退回到静坐主义、特殊主义边界后面的人群的命运。本章探讨了这些在不断变化的世界中重新获得某种安全感的愿望如何为当代形式的民粹主义提供了温床。最后,本文还考虑了Covid-19大流行如何重塑之前关于流动性和社会性的辩论。关于提高流通速度的毫无疑问的价值的假设,在这样一个背景下呈现出完全不同的色调,在这个背景下,主导的修辞现在必然是社会距离和边界监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile Socialities
This chapter offers a meta-commentary on the concept of mobile socialites, and on claims that the new technologies of our globalised age have ushered in a borderless world of unprecedented rates of mobility and time-space compression. That vision of how Progress is driven by improvements in the efficiency of transport and communication is here placed in historical context, in an attempt to avoid the dangers of an unself-conscious focus on the present day. The analysis addresses questions concerning how ideas of home and community need to be adapted in the context of contemporary changes in patterns of communication and physical mobility and the changing relations of virtual and material geographies. It focusses on differential mobilities, the politics of waiting - and exclusion- and the continuing significance of place-based modes of sociality. It also discusses the fate of those populations who, rather than exploring any kind of mobile sociality, are increasingly retreating behind sedentarist, particularistic boundaries. The chapter investigates how these desires to to regain some sense of security in a world of flux have provided the seed-bed for the contemporary forms of populism. In conclusion, the argument also considers how the Covid-19 pandemic is reshaping previous debates about both mobility and sociality. Presumptions about the unquestioned value of increased speeds of circulation take on a quite different hue in a context in which the dominant rhetoric is necessarily now one of social distancing and boundary regulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信