{"title":"在所罗门群岛的新乔治亚群岛中纠缠的轴线","authors":"T. Thomas","doi":"10.22459/TA51.2019.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional exchange networks of great variety and complexity are among the most studied phenomena in archaeological and ethnographic accounts of Island Melanesia. Malinowski’s (1922) pioneering ethnography of the kula system of southern Papua New Guinea produced an enduring image of exchange as foundational to Melanesian social life, and subsequent ethnographic efforts dedicated to elucidating the role of exchange in political structures, gender relations, ritual and symbolism (Leach and Leach 1983; Strathern 1988), have made lasting contributions to social theory. Archaeologists, for their part, have focused on identifying the range and pattern of exchange networks—from the expansive material transfers of the Lapita cultural complex (Kirch 1988; Summerhayes 2000) to the development of smaller but more intensive networks of later periods (Allen 1984).","PeriodicalId":273724,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axes of entanglement in the New Georgia group, Solomon Islands\",\"authors\":\"T. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/TA51.2019.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regional exchange networks of great variety and complexity are among the most studied phenomena in archaeological and ethnographic accounts of Island Melanesia. Malinowski’s (1922) pioneering ethnography of the kula system of southern Papua New Guinea produced an enduring image of exchange as foundational to Melanesian social life, and subsequent ethnographic efforts dedicated to elucidating the role of exchange in political structures, gender relations, ritual and symbolism (Leach and Leach 1983; Strathern 1988), have made lasting contributions to social theory. Archaeologists, for their part, have focused on identifying the range and pattern of exchange networks—from the expansive material transfers of the Lapita cultural complex (Kirch 1988; Summerhayes 2000) to the development of smaller but more intensive networks of later periods (Allen 1984).\",\"PeriodicalId\":273724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/TA51.2019.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologies of Island Melanesia: Current approaches to landscapes, exchange and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/TA51.2019.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
多样性和复杂性的区域交换网络是美拉尼西亚岛考古和民族志中研究最多的现象之一。马林诺夫斯基(1922年)对巴布亚新几内亚南部库拉制度的开创性民族志研究产生了一种持久的形象,即交换是美拉尼西亚社会生活的基础,随后的民族志研究致力于阐明交换在政治结构、性别关系、仪式和象征主义中的作用(Leach and Leach 1983;Strathern, 1988),对社会理论做出了持久的贡献。对于考古学家来说,他们的重点是确定交换网络的范围和模式——从拉皮塔文化综合体的广泛物质转移(Kirch 1988;Summerhayes 2000)到后期更小但更密集的网络发展(Allen 1984)。
Axes of entanglement in the New Georgia group, Solomon Islands
Regional exchange networks of great variety and complexity are among the most studied phenomena in archaeological and ethnographic accounts of Island Melanesia. Malinowski’s (1922) pioneering ethnography of the kula system of southern Papua New Guinea produced an enduring image of exchange as foundational to Melanesian social life, and subsequent ethnographic efforts dedicated to elucidating the role of exchange in political structures, gender relations, ritual and symbolism (Leach and Leach 1983; Strathern 1988), have made lasting contributions to social theory. Archaeologists, for their part, have focused on identifying the range and pattern of exchange networks—from the expansive material transfers of the Lapita cultural complex (Kirch 1988; Summerhayes 2000) to the development of smaller but more intensive networks of later periods (Allen 1984).