从家庭保健中心工作人员的观察了解疫苗接种犹豫

Alişan Duaci, Menduha Şahi̇n, Ü. T. Babaoğlu
{"title":"从家庭保健中心工作人员的观察了解疫苗接种犹豫","authors":"Alişan Duaci, Menduha Şahi̇n, Ü. T. Babaoğlu","doi":"10.52831/kjhs.1277721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Family health centers are the first place for healthcare providers and vaccine-hesitant parents who need information. Healthcare providers can play an important role in mitigating vaccine hesitancy by providing accurate information to parents. This study aims to determine the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy or refusal among parents encountered by healthcare workers in family health centers in Kırşehir, and to identify associated factors. \nMethod: The study population consisted of family health workers working in Family Health Centers at the Kırşehir Center. The data from used in the cross-sectional study was prepared by the researchers by reviewing the literature. The data were collected by aplying face-to-face question and answer technique during the visits of the researchers to the family health centers. \nResults: When asked about the rate of vaccine hesitancy/refusal in the past year, 13.2% (n=10) reported that they had encountered it frequently, and 28.9% (n=22) reported that they had encountered it at least once. Of the participants, 61.8% (n=47) reported that the socioeconomic level of families experiencing vaccine refusal was high. When the participants met with a parent who refused vaccination, 98.7% (n=75) stated that they would explain the necessity of vaccines and encourage them to receive them, and 1.3% (n=1) stated that they would respect this decision. The most common reason given to the participants by families who were undecide or refusal vaccine was objections to the ingredients in the vaccine (mercury, thimerosal, etc.) with rate of 71.1% (n=54). \nConclusion: Vaccine ambivalence was found to be against all vaccines and the act of vaccination, not against a specific vaccine. It was observed that when families who were hesitant about vaccination were informed by healthcare proffessionals, their attitudes changed. For this reason, it is important that parents with vaccine hesitancy are adequately and accurately informed about vaccines. It is thought that regular trainings should be organized for both healthcare professionals and families on vaccination in Turkey and the health literacy level of the society should be increased.","PeriodicalId":212263,"journal":{"name":"Karya Journal of Health Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UNDERSTANDING VACCINATION HESITATION FROM OBSERVATIONS OF FAMILY HEALTH CENTER WORKERS\",\"authors\":\"Alişan Duaci, Menduha Şahi̇n, Ü. T. Babaoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.52831/kjhs.1277721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Family health centers are the first place for healthcare providers and vaccine-hesitant parents who need information. Healthcare providers can play an important role in mitigating vaccine hesitancy by providing accurate information to parents. This study aims to determine the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy or refusal among parents encountered by healthcare workers in family health centers in Kırşehir, and to identify associated factors. \\nMethod: The study population consisted of family health workers working in Family Health Centers at the Kırşehir Center. The data from used in the cross-sectional study was prepared by the researchers by reviewing the literature. The data were collected by aplying face-to-face question and answer technique during the visits of the researchers to the family health centers. \\nResults: When asked about the rate of vaccine hesitancy/refusal in the past year, 13.2% (n=10) reported that they had encountered it frequently, and 28.9% (n=22) reported that they had encountered it at least once. Of the participants, 61.8% (n=47) reported that the socioeconomic level of families experiencing vaccine refusal was high. When the participants met with a parent who refused vaccination, 98.7% (n=75) stated that they would explain the necessity of vaccines and encourage them to receive them, and 1.3% (n=1) stated that they would respect this decision. The most common reason given to the participants by families who were undecide or refusal vaccine was objections to the ingredients in the vaccine (mercury, thimerosal, etc.) with rate of 71.1% (n=54). \\nConclusion: Vaccine ambivalence was found to be against all vaccines and the act of vaccination, not against a specific vaccine. It was observed that when families who were hesitant about vaccination were informed by healthcare proffessionals, their attitudes changed. For this reason, it is important that parents with vaccine hesitancy are adequately and accurately informed about vaccines. It is thought that regular trainings should be organized for both healthcare professionals and families on vaccination in Turkey and the health literacy level of the society should be increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karya Journal of Health Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karya Journal of Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1277721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karya Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1277721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:家庭健康中心是医疗保健提供者和需要信息的疫苗犹豫父母的首选场所。卫生保健提供者可以通过向家长提供准确的信息,在减轻疫苗犹豫方面发挥重要作用。本研究旨在确定Kırşehir家庭保健中心医护人员遇到的父母中疫苗犹豫或拒绝接种的患病率,并确定相关因素。方法:研究人群为在Kırşehir中心家庭卫生中心工作的家庭卫生工作者。横断面研究中使用的数据是由研究人员通过查阅文献准备的。研究人员走访家庭健康中心时,采用面对面问答法收集数据。结果:在被问及近一年的疫苗犹豫/拒绝率时,13.2% (n=10)的人表示经常遇到,28.9% (n=22)的人表示至少遇到过一次。在参与者中,61.8% (n=47)报告说,经历疫苗拒绝的家庭的社会经济水平很高。当参与者遇到拒绝接种疫苗的家长时,98.7% (n=75)表示他们会解释疫苗的必要性并鼓励他们接种疫苗,1.3% (n=1)表示他们会尊重这一决定。未决定或拒绝接种疫苗的家庭给出的最常见原因是对疫苗成分(汞、硫柳汞等)的反对,占71.1% (n=54)。结论:疫苗矛盾心理是针对所有疫苗和接种行为,而不是针对某一特定疫苗。据观察,当卫生保健专业人员告知对疫苗接种犹豫不决的家庭时,他们的态度发生了变化。因此,让对疫苗有犹豫的家长充分和准确地了解疫苗是很重要的。据认为,应定期为土耳其的保健专业人员和家庭组织关于疫苗接种的培训,并应提高社会的卫生知识水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UNDERSTANDING VACCINATION HESITATION FROM OBSERVATIONS OF FAMILY HEALTH CENTER WORKERS
Objective: Family health centers are the first place for healthcare providers and vaccine-hesitant parents who need information. Healthcare providers can play an important role in mitigating vaccine hesitancy by providing accurate information to parents. This study aims to determine the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy or refusal among parents encountered by healthcare workers in family health centers in Kırşehir, and to identify associated factors. Method: The study population consisted of family health workers working in Family Health Centers at the Kırşehir Center. The data from used in the cross-sectional study was prepared by the researchers by reviewing the literature. The data were collected by aplying face-to-face question and answer technique during the visits of the researchers to the family health centers. Results: When asked about the rate of vaccine hesitancy/refusal in the past year, 13.2% (n=10) reported that they had encountered it frequently, and 28.9% (n=22) reported that they had encountered it at least once. Of the participants, 61.8% (n=47) reported that the socioeconomic level of families experiencing vaccine refusal was high. When the participants met with a parent who refused vaccination, 98.7% (n=75) stated that they would explain the necessity of vaccines and encourage them to receive them, and 1.3% (n=1) stated that they would respect this decision. The most common reason given to the participants by families who were undecide or refusal vaccine was objections to the ingredients in the vaccine (mercury, thimerosal, etc.) with rate of 71.1% (n=54). Conclusion: Vaccine ambivalence was found to be against all vaccines and the act of vaccination, not against a specific vaccine. It was observed that when families who were hesitant about vaccination were informed by healthcare proffessionals, their attitudes changed. For this reason, it is important that parents with vaccine hesitancy are adequately and accurately informed about vaccines. It is thought that regular trainings should be organized for both healthcare professionals and families on vaccination in Turkey and the health literacy level of the society should be increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信