开放分割:开放获取的关键研究,由乌尔里希·赫伯和约阿希姆编辑Schöpfel

Samuel J. Edge
{"title":"开放分割:开放获取的关键研究,由乌尔里希·赫伯和约阿希姆编辑Schöpfel","authors":"Samuel J. Edge","doi":"10.5860/JIFP.V4I1.6788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open access is frequently a topic of conversation in library and information studies courses. Usually imbued with hints of social justice, progressivism, and equality, professors and students alike often point to open access as something that librarianship “got right.” On a personal level, while working with document delivery in a large biomedical library, I became an enthusiastic supporter of open access articles and journals that allowed me to save staff time and deliver content to our patrons more expeditiously. After reading Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access, my relationship with open access is no longer quite so simple. Open Divide lays the concept of open access bare, making note of its benefits, but also clearly exposing its flaws, faults, and corruptions.","PeriodicalId":422726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","volume":"261 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access, edited by Ulrich Herb and Joachim Schöpfel\",\"authors\":\"Samuel J. Edge\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/JIFP.V4I1.6788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open access is frequently a topic of conversation in library and information studies courses. Usually imbued with hints of social justice, progressivism, and equality, professors and students alike often point to open access as something that librarianship “got right.” On a personal level, while working with document delivery in a large biomedical library, I became an enthusiastic supporter of open access articles and journals that allowed me to save staff time and deliver content to our patrons more expeditiously. After reading Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access, my relationship with open access is no longer quite so simple. Open Divide lays the concept of open access bare, making note of its benefits, but also clearly exposing its flaws, faults, and corruptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy\",\"volume\":\"261 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/JIFP.V4I1.6788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/JIFP.V4I1.6788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在图书馆和信息研究课程中,开放获取经常是一个话题。通常充满了社会正义、进步主义和平等的暗示,教授和学生都经常指出开放获取是图书馆事业“做对了”的事情。在个人层面上,当我在一家大型生物医学图书馆从事文档传递工作时,我成为了开放获取文章和期刊的热情支持者,这让我节省了员工的时间,并更迅速地将内容传递给我们的顾客。在阅读了《Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access》之后,我与开放获取的关系不再那么简单了。Open Divide公开了开放获取的概念,指出了它的好处,但也清楚地暴露了它的缺陷、缺陷和腐败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access, edited by Ulrich Herb and Joachim Schöpfel
Open access is frequently a topic of conversation in library and information studies courses. Usually imbued with hints of social justice, progressivism, and equality, professors and students alike often point to open access as something that librarianship “got right.” On a personal level, while working with document delivery in a large biomedical library, I became an enthusiastic supporter of open access articles and journals that allowed me to save staff time and deliver content to our patrons more expeditiously. After reading Open Divide: Critical Studies on Open Access, my relationship with open access is no longer quite so simple. Open Divide lays the concept of open access bare, making note of its benefits, but also clearly exposing its flaws, faults, and corruptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信