无限快乐:菲利伯斯和无限戏剧

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015116
J. Kress
{"title":"无限快乐:菲利伯斯和无限戏剧","authors":"J. Kress","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Philebus is a difficult dialogue, often criticized for treating obscure ontological questions while neglecting the dramatic aspect characteristic of the Platonic dialogue. In this paper, I argue that,while subtle, the dramatic dimension is essential in understanding the ontological inquiries pursued and the dialogue as a whole. I argue that the Philebus should be read as an agon, a dramatic contest, between Socrates, the advocate of nous, and Philebus, the silent advocate of hedone. I show that this contest about the nature of the Good must be executed dramatically because, as Plato brings to light, hedone belongs to the Unlimited, and as such, always and necessarily resists reduction to logos, which, as dianoia, is necessarily connected with nous and Limit.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleasure Unlimited: Philebus and the Drama of the Unlimited\",\"authors\":\"J. Kress\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE201015116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Philebus is a difficult dialogue, often criticized for treating obscure ontological questions while neglecting the dramatic aspect characteristic of the Platonic dialogue. In this paper, I argue that,while subtle, the dramatic dimension is essential in understanding the ontological inquiries pursued and the dialogue as a whole. I argue that the Philebus should be read as an agon, a dramatic contest, between Socrates, the advocate of nous, and Philebus, the silent advocate of hedone. I show that this contest about the nature of the Good must be executed dramatically because, as Plato brings to light, hedone belongs to the Unlimited, and as such, always and necessarily resists reduction to logos, which, as dianoia, is necessarily connected with nous and Limit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《菲利伯斯》是一部困难的对话录,经常被批评为处理晦涩的本体论问题,而忽视了柏拉图式对话录的戏剧性特征。在本文中,我认为,戏剧维度虽然微妙,但对于理解所追求的本体论探究和整体对话至关重要。我认为《菲利伯斯篇》应该被解读为一场较量,一场戏剧性的较量,发生在主张理性的苏格拉底和主张理性的沉默的菲利伯斯之间。我指出,这种关于善的本质的争论必须戏剧性地进行,因为,正如柏拉图所揭示的那样,他属于无限,因此,总是并且必然地抵制还原为逻各斯,而逻各斯,作为精神,必然与理性和极限联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pleasure Unlimited: Philebus and the Drama of the Unlimited
The Philebus is a difficult dialogue, often criticized for treating obscure ontological questions while neglecting the dramatic aspect characteristic of the Platonic dialogue. In this paper, I argue that,while subtle, the dramatic dimension is essential in understanding the ontological inquiries pursued and the dialogue as a whole. I argue that the Philebus should be read as an agon, a dramatic contest, between Socrates, the advocate of nous, and Philebus, the silent advocate of hedone. I show that this contest about the nature of the Good must be executed dramatically because, as Plato brings to light, hedone belongs to the Unlimited, and as such, always and necessarily resists reduction to logos, which, as dianoia, is necessarily connected with nous and Limit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信