奥地利的岩崩危险区。制定标准化程序的经验、问题和解决办法

M. Mölk, B. Rieder
{"title":"奥地利的岩崩危险区。制定标准化程序的经验、问题和解决办法","authors":"M. Mölk, B. Rieder","doi":"10.1002/geot.201600065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz (ÖROK) set up a partnership in 2011 to deal with ”Risk management for gravitational natural hazards in landuse planning“. As gravitational natural hazards have a decisive influence on development in the Alpine Region, standard procedures were developed for the assessment of the relevance of these processes for landuse planning. This paper describes the recommended procedure for the assessment of hazards affecting permanent settlements from rockfall in a top‐down approach. The first step to define potential conflicts between the maximum run‐out of rockfall processes and the presence of settlements is a conservative empirical assessment based on rock outcrops serving as potential detachment zones and the maximum reach of such rockfalls, leading to a hazard indication map. This approach is only based on existing cartographic information, field investigations are not necessarily involved at this stage. To ensure conservative results, the use of a high‐resolution 1 m ground model to identify rock outcrops is re commended. The next step includes a thorough examination of those areas in the hazard indication map with conflicts between the maximum reach/run‐out of falling blocks and settlements. This stage includes field investigations with mapping of maximum reach blocks, block size distributions, underground conditions of the transit zone and the condition of rock outcrops that act as potential detachment zones. All this information is subsequently integrated into a 3D rockfall simulation. As a result the modelling enables a delineation of areas out of reach (no rockfall hazard), areas with potential impact energies ≤ 100 kJ (low intensity) and areas with potential impact energies > 100 kJ (high intensity).","PeriodicalId":170042,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Tunnelling","volume":"17 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rockfall hazard zones in Austria. Experience, problems and solutions in the development of a standardised procedure\",\"authors\":\"M. Mölk, B. Rieder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/geot.201600065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz (ÖROK) set up a partnership in 2011 to deal with ”Risk management for gravitational natural hazards in landuse planning“. As gravitational natural hazards have a decisive influence on development in the Alpine Region, standard procedures were developed for the assessment of the relevance of these processes for landuse planning. This paper describes the recommended procedure for the assessment of hazards affecting permanent settlements from rockfall in a top‐down approach. The first step to define potential conflicts between the maximum run‐out of rockfall processes and the presence of settlements is a conservative empirical assessment based on rock outcrops serving as potential detachment zones and the maximum reach of such rockfalls, leading to a hazard indication map. This approach is only based on existing cartographic information, field investigations are not necessarily involved at this stage. To ensure conservative results, the use of a high‐resolution 1 m ground model to identify rock outcrops is re commended. The next step includes a thorough examination of those areas in the hazard indication map with conflicts between the maximum reach/run‐out of falling blocks and settlements. This stage includes field investigations with mapping of maximum reach blocks, block size distributions, underground conditions of the transit zone and the condition of rock outcrops that act as potential detachment zones. All this information is subsequently integrated into a 3D rockfall simulation. As a result the modelling enables a delineation of areas out of reach (no rockfall hazard), areas with potential impact energies ≤ 100 kJ (low intensity) and areas with potential impact energies > 100 kJ (high intensity).\",\"PeriodicalId\":170042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics and Tunnelling\",\"volume\":\"17 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics and Tunnelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201600065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Tunnelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201600065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz (ÖROK)于2011年建立了一个合作伙伴关系,以处理“土地利用规划中重力自然灾害的风险管理”。由于重力自然灾害对高山地区的发展具有决定性影响,因此制定了标准程序,以评估这些过程与土地利用规划的相关性。本文介绍了采用自顶向下的方法对影响永久定居点的岩崩危害进行评估的推荐程序。确定最大岩崩过程和聚落存在之间的潜在冲突的第一步是保守的经验评估,该评估基于作为潜在剥离带的岩石露头和此类岩崩的最大范围,从而得出危险指示图。这种办法只是根据现有的制图资料,在这个阶段不一定涉及实地调查。为了确保保守的结果,建议使用高分辨率的1米地面模型来识别岩石露头。下一步包括对危险指示图中存在最大可及范围/落块耗尽与居民点之间冲突的区域进行彻底检查。这一阶段包括实地调查,绘制最大范围块体、块体大小分布、过渡带的地下条件和作为潜在剥离带的岩石露头的条件。所有这些信息随后被整合到三维岩崩模拟中。因此,该模型能够描绘出无法到达的区域(无岩崩危险),潜在冲击能量≤100 kJ(低强度)的区域和潜在冲击能量> 100 kJ(高强度)的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rockfall hazard zones in Austria. Experience, problems and solutions in the development of a standardised procedure
The Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz (ÖROK) set up a partnership in 2011 to deal with ”Risk management for gravitational natural hazards in landuse planning“. As gravitational natural hazards have a decisive influence on development in the Alpine Region, standard procedures were developed for the assessment of the relevance of these processes for landuse planning. This paper describes the recommended procedure for the assessment of hazards affecting permanent settlements from rockfall in a top‐down approach. The first step to define potential conflicts between the maximum run‐out of rockfall processes and the presence of settlements is a conservative empirical assessment based on rock outcrops serving as potential detachment zones and the maximum reach of such rockfalls, leading to a hazard indication map. This approach is only based on existing cartographic information, field investigations are not necessarily involved at this stage. To ensure conservative results, the use of a high‐resolution 1 m ground model to identify rock outcrops is re commended. The next step includes a thorough examination of those areas in the hazard indication map with conflicts between the maximum reach/run‐out of falling blocks and settlements. This stage includes field investigations with mapping of maximum reach blocks, block size distributions, underground conditions of the transit zone and the condition of rock outcrops that act as potential detachment zones. All this information is subsequently integrated into a 3D rockfall simulation. As a result the modelling enables a delineation of areas out of reach (no rockfall hazard), areas with potential impact energies ≤ 100 kJ (low intensity) and areas with potential impact energies > 100 kJ (high intensity).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信