新型抗精神病药物和急性张力障碍反应。

M. Raja, A. Azzoni
{"title":"新型抗精神病药物和急性张力障碍反应。","authors":"M. Raja, A. Azzoni","doi":"10.1017/S1461145701002620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing use of atypical antipsychotics has led to a decrease of acute dystonic reactions (ADR). To evaluate the prevalence of ADR, we recorded all ADR occurring in a population of patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit. Among 1337 cases treated with antipsychotics, we observed 41 cases (3.1%) affected by ADR. At discharge, mean chlorpromazine-equivalent daily dose was 465.8 (+/-421.5) mg, while 39 cases (3.0%), all treated with typical neuroleptics, received anticholinergics. During hospitalization, 15 cases received quetiapine, 19 sertindole, 95 olanzapine, 142 clozapine, 495 risperidone and 561 typical neuroleptics. Four ADR occurred among the cases treated with risperidone monotherapy, and 4 occurred in risperidone-treated patients after emergency parenteral treatment with typical neuroleptics. In these last 4 cases, temporal relationship suggested that typical neuroleptics had caused ADR. One ADR occurred in a patient treated with olanzapine and 1 ADR in a patient treated with quetiapine. Among cases assuming typical neuroleptics, 32 ADR occurred. The difference between typical and atypical neuroleptics is highly significant (chi2 = 27.756; d.f. = 1; p = 0.000). Atypical antipsychotics carry a minimal risk of ADR.","PeriodicalId":394244,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel antipsychotics and acute dystonic reactions.\",\"authors\":\"M. Raja, A. Azzoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1461145701002620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing use of atypical antipsychotics has led to a decrease of acute dystonic reactions (ADR). To evaluate the prevalence of ADR, we recorded all ADR occurring in a population of patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit. Among 1337 cases treated with antipsychotics, we observed 41 cases (3.1%) affected by ADR. At discharge, mean chlorpromazine-equivalent daily dose was 465.8 (+/-421.5) mg, while 39 cases (3.0%), all treated with typical neuroleptics, received anticholinergics. During hospitalization, 15 cases received quetiapine, 19 sertindole, 95 olanzapine, 142 clozapine, 495 risperidone and 561 typical neuroleptics. Four ADR occurred among the cases treated with risperidone monotherapy, and 4 occurred in risperidone-treated patients after emergency parenteral treatment with typical neuroleptics. In these last 4 cases, temporal relationship suggested that typical neuroleptics had caused ADR. One ADR occurred in a patient treated with olanzapine and 1 ADR in a patient treated with quetiapine. Among cases assuming typical neuroleptics, 32 ADR occurred. The difference between typical and atypical neuroleptics is highly significant (chi2 = 27.756; d.f. = 1; p = 0.000). Atypical antipsychotics carry a minimal risk of ADR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

越来越多的非典型抗精神病药物的使用导致急性张力障碍反应(ADR)的减少。为了评估不良反应的发生率,我们记录了连续入住精神科重症监护病房的患者群体中发生的所有不良反应。在1337例使用抗精神病药物的患者中,我们观察到41例(3.1%)发生不良反应。出院时,平均氯丙嗪当量日剂量为465.8 (+/-421.5)mg, 39例(3.0%)患者接受抗胆碱能药物治疗。住院期间使用喹硫平15例,塞替多尔19例,奥氮平95例,氯氮平142例,利培酮495例,典型抗精神病药物561例。在利培酮单药治疗中发生4例不良反应,在利培酮治疗患者急诊外注射典型抗精神病药物后发生4例不良反应。在最后4例中,时间关系提示典型抗精神病药物引起不良反应。用奥氮平治疗的患者发生1例不良反应,用喹硫平治疗的患者发生1例不良反应。在典型抗精神病药病例中,32例发生不良反应。典型与非典型抗精神病药的差异非常显著(ch2 = 27.756;d.f. = 1;P = 0.000)。非典型抗精神病药物的不良反应风险很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel antipsychotics and acute dystonic reactions.
The growing use of atypical antipsychotics has led to a decrease of acute dystonic reactions (ADR). To evaluate the prevalence of ADR, we recorded all ADR occurring in a population of patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit. Among 1337 cases treated with antipsychotics, we observed 41 cases (3.1%) affected by ADR. At discharge, mean chlorpromazine-equivalent daily dose was 465.8 (+/-421.5) mg, while 39 cases (3.0%), all treated with typical neuroleptics, received anticholinergics. During hospitalization, 15 cases received quetiapine, 19 sertindole, 95 olanzapine, 142 clozapine, 495 risperidone and 561 typical neuroleptics. Four ADR occurred among the cases treated with risperidone monotherapy, and 4 occurred in risperidone-treated patients after emergency parenteral treatment with typical neuroleptics. In these last 4 cases, temporal relationship suggested that typical neuroleptics had caused ADR. One ADR occurred in a patient treated with olanzapine and 1 ADR in a patient treated with quetiapine. Among cases assuming typical neuroleptics, 32 ADR occurred. The difference between typical and atypical neuroleptics is highly significant (chi2 = 27.756; d.f. = 1; p = 0.000). Atypical antipsychotics carry a minimal risk of ADR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信