{"title":"一种新型缝线结构作为肩袖单排修复技术的生物力学比较","authors":"David Lieu, S. Tan, D. Bell, B. Walsh, Amir Rubin","doi":"10.5580/2ba6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Arthroscopic techniques of rotator cuff repair are constantly evolving. Although biomechanically stronger, doublerow repair techniques have not been proven to be clinically superior. There are also situations where double-row techniques are not suitable and/or indicated. In these circumstances typical single-row sutures used are the simple suture or the modified Mason-Allen suture. We describe an alternative single-row suture technique – the ‘Down Under Suture Technique’ (DUST). We hypothesise that this suture has an improved tendon-to-bone contact area and pull-out strength than the established alternatives. Methods In a controlled laboratory study, 1cm tears of the infraspinatus tendon were created in 42 fresh frozen porcine shoulders. The tears were repaired using either a simple suture, a modified Mason-Allen suture or a DUST suture. The tendon-to-bone contact area was measured and compared in 15 shoulders, and suture pull-out strength was measured in the remaining 27 specimens. Results The DUST suture achieved a tendon-to-bone contact area of 122 mm, significantly higher than that achieved by the MasonAllen (48 mm, p=0.008) and simple suture (51 mm, p=0.01). Suture pull-out strength was 191N, significantly higher than the simple suture (97N, p=0.028), but not significantly higher than the Mason-Allen suture (127N, p=0.22). Conclusions We conclude that the DUST has favourable biomechanical properties when compared to other single-row suture techniques. It is a useful arthroscopic alternative where a single row cuff repair is needed.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Comparison Of A Novel Suture Configuration As An Alternative Single-Row Repair Technique For Rotator Cuff Repair\",\"authors\":\"David Lieu, S. Tan, D. Bell, B. Walsh, Amir Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2ba6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Arthroscopic techniques of rotator cuff repair are constantly evolving. Although biomechanically stronger, doublerow repair techniques have not been proven to be clinically superior. There are also situations where double-row techniques are not suitable and/or indicated. In these circumstances typical single-row sutures used are the simple suture or the modified Mason-Allen suture. We describe an alternative single-row suture technique – the ‘Down Under Suture Technique’ (DUST). We hypothesise that this suture has an improved tendon-to-bone contact area and pull-out strength than the established alternatives. Methods In a controlled laboratory study, 1cm tears of the infraspinatus tendon were created in 42 fresh frozen porcine shoulders. The tears were repaired using either a simple suture, a modified Mason-Allen suture or a DUST suture. The tendon-to-bone contact area was measured and compared in 15 shoulders, and suture pull-out strength was measured in the remaining 27 specimens. Results The DUST suture achieved a tendon-to-bone contact area of 122 mm, significantly higher than that achieved by the MasonAllen (48 mm, p=0.008) and simple suture (51 mm, p=0.01). Suture pull-out strength was 191N, significantly higher than the simple suture (97N, p=0.028), but not significantly higher than the Mason-Allen suture (127N, p=0.22). Conclusions We conclude that the DUST has favourable biomechanical properties when compared to other single-row suture techniques. It is a useful arthroscopic alternative where a single row cuff repair is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2ba6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2ba6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:关节镜下肩袖修复技术在不断发展。虽然生物力学上更强,但双重修复技术尚未被证明具有临床优势。也有双排技术不适合和/或指示的情况。在这种情况下,典型的单排缝合线是简单缝合线或改良的梅森-艾伦缝合线。我们描述了一种可选择的单行缝合技术-“Down Under缝合技术”(DUST)。我们假设这种缝线比现有的缝线具有更好的肌腱与骨接触面积和拉出强度。方法采用实验室对照研究方法,对42头新鲜冷冻猪肩胛骨制造1cm的冈下肌腱撕裂。使用简单缝线、改良的Mason-Allen缝线或DUST缝线修复撕裂。测量并比较了15个肩部的肌腱与骨接触面积,并测量了其余27个标本的缝线拔出强度。结果DUST缝合的肌腱与骨接触面积为122 mm,显著高于MasonAllen缝合(48 mm, p=0.008)和单纯缝合(51 mm, p=0.01)。缝线拔出强度为191N,显著高于单纯缝合(97N, p=0.028),但不显著高于Mason-Allen缝合(127N, p=0.22)。结论:与其他单排缝合技术相比,DUST具有良好的生物力学性能。当需要单排袖带修复时,这是一种有用的关节镜替代方法。
Biomechanical Comparison Of A Novel Suture Configuration As An Alternative Single-Row Repair Technique For Rotator Cuff Repair
Background Arthroscopic techniques of rotator cuff repair are constantly evolving. Although biomechanically stronger, doublerow repair techniques have not been proven to be clinically superior. There are also situations where double-row techniques are not suitable and/or indicated. In these circumstances typical single-row sutures used are the simple suture or the modified Mason-Allen suture. We describe an alternative single-row suture technique – the ‘Down Under Suture Technique’ (DUST). We hypothesise that this suture has an improved tendon-to-bone contact area and pull-out strength than the established alternatives. Methods In a controlled laboratory study, 1cm tears of the infraspinatus tendon were created in 42 fresh frozen porcine shoulders. The tears were repaired using either a simple suture, a modified Mason-Allen suture or a DUST suture. The tendon-to-bone contact area was measured and compared in 15 shoulders, and suture pull-out strength was measured in the remaining 27 specimens. Results The DUST suture achieved a tendon-to-bone contact area of 122 mm, significantly higher than that achieved by the MasonAllen (48 mm, p=0.008) and simple suture (51 mm, p=0.01). Suture pull-out strength was 191N, significantly higher than the simple suture (97N, p=0.028), but not significantly higher than the Mason-Allen suture (127N, p=0.22). Conclusions We conclude that the DUST has favourable biomechanical properties when compared to other single-row suture techniques. It is a useful arthroscopic alternative where a single row cuff repair is needed.