我们来谈谈直肌鞘导管。急诊剖腹手术镇痛技术的回顾性分析

J. Bordoni, S. Siew, C. Buffery, M. Goulden
{"title":"我们来谈谈直肌鞘导管。急诊剖腹手术镇痛技术的回顾性分析","authors":"J. Bordoni, S. Siew, C. Buffery, M. Goulden","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019656) following approval from Max Healthcare Ethics Committee. 80 adult female patients (ASA grades I&II) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive PECS block and ESP block with 30 ml of 0.375% Levobupivacaine, after induction of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was administered for postoperative pain relief via PCA pump. Outcomes such as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess pain, time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction etc. were statistically analysed. Results Patients given modified PECS block experienced significantly better quality of analgesia and perceived the block to be more satisfactory with respect to pain relief and ability to sleep (p < 0.001). With PECS block, patients showed significantly lower mean NRS scores at 24-hours postoperatively (1.18 ±1.13 vs 2.65 ±0.98)(p<0.001) and total fentanyl consumed was considerably lesser (61.25 ± 41.58 mcg vs 183.75 ± 51.13 mcg)(p<0.001). Conclusions We found that modified PECS block provided superior postoperative analgesia than ESP block in patients undergoing MRM without any adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":184382,"journal":{"name":"Postoperative pain management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"218 Let’s talk about rectus sheath catheters. A retrospective audit of analgesic techniques used in emergency laparotomy\",\"authors\":\"J. Bordoni, S. Siew, C. Buffery, M. Goulden\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019656) following approval from Max Healthcare Ethics Committee. 80 adult female patients (ASA grades I&II) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive PECS block and ESP block with 30 ml of 0.375% Levobupivacaine, after induction of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was administered for postoperative pain relief via PCA pump. Outcomes such as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess pain, time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction etc. were statistically analysed. Results Patients given modified PECS block experienced significantly better quality of analgesia and perceived the block to be more satisfactory with respect to pain relief and ability to sleep (p < 0.001). With PECS block, patients showed significantly lower mean NRS scores at 24-hours postoperatively (1.18 ±1.13 vs 2.65 ±0.98)(p<0.001) and total fentanyl consumed was considerably lesser (61.25 ± 41.58 mcg vs 183.75 ± 51.13 mcg)(p<0.001). Conclusions We found that modified PECS block provided superior postoperative analgesia than ESP block in patients undergoing MRM without any adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postoperative pain management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postoperative pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postoperative pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-esra.218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经Max Healthcare伦理委员会批准,印度注册中心(CTRI/2019/06/019656)将80例接受改良根治性乳房切除术的成年女性患者(ASA分级为i和ii级)随机分为两组,分别在麻醉诱导后使用0.375%左布比卡因30 ml进行PECS阻滞和ESP阻滞。芬太尼通过PCA泵缓解术后疼痛。统计分析疼痛评分、首次抢救镇痛时间、术中术后芬太尼用量、PONV发生率、患者满意度等结果。结果改良PECS阻滞的患者镇痛质量明显提高,疼痛缓解和睡眠能力更令人满意(p < 0.001)。PECS阻滞组患者术后24小时平均NRS评分显著降低(1.18±1.13 vs 2.65±0.98)(p<0.001),芬太尼总消耗显著降低(61.25±41.58 mcg vs 183.75±51.13 mcg)(p<0.001)。结论改良PECS阻滞在MRM患者术后镇痛效果优于ESP阻滞,且无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
218 Let’s talk about rectus sheath catheters. A retrospective audit of analgesic techniques used in emergency laparotomy
Registry of India (CTRI/2019/06/019656) following approval from Max Healthcare Ethics Committee. 80 adult female patients (ASA grades I&II) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomly allocated into two groups to receive PECS block and ESP block with 30 ml of 0.375% Levobupivacaine, after induction of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was administered for postoperative pain relief via PCA pump. Outcomes such as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores to assess pain, time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl requirement, incidence of PONV, patient satisfaction etc. were statistically analysed. Results Patients given modified PECS block experienced significantly better quality of analgesia and perceived the block to be more satisfactory with respect to pain relief and ability to sleep (p < 0.001). With PECS block, patients showed significantly lower mean NRS scores at 24-hours postoperatively (1.18 ±1.13 vs 2.65 ±0.98)(p<0.001) and total fentanyl consumed was considerably lesser (61.25 ± 41.58 mcg vs 183.75 ± 51.13 mcg)(p<0.001). Conclusions We found that modified PECS block provided superior postoperative analgesia than ESP block in patients undergoing MRM without any adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信