关于类别的互操作性和话语过程

Orélie Desfriches-Doria, J. Debaz, Waldir Lisboa Rocha Filho
{"title":"关于类别的互操作性和话语过程","authors":"Orélie Desfriches-Doria, J. Debaz, Waldir Lisboa Rocha Filho","doi":"10.1145/3423603.3424005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With interdisciplinary contexts and various epistemic points of view, Digital Humanities implies to take into account social dimensions in the production of tools, methods and archive processes. From a pragmatic point of view, Digital Humanities activities involve complex interpretative processes, linking human (individual and collective understanding) and algorithmic computation spaces. This articulation is emphasized in Prospéro software, but still has to support community dialog processes, which can be understood according to vocabulary alignment paradigm or socio-anthropological usage of language paradigm. In order to do so, we give some exploratory guidelines to express and historicize taxonomic processes and define the conditions by which algorithms could support such developments.","PeriodicalId":387247,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress","volume":"442 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interoperability and discursive process about categories\",\"authors\":\"Orélie Desfriches-Doria, J. Debaz, Waldir Lisboa Rocha Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3423603.3424005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With interdisciplinary contexts and various epistemic points of view, Digital Humanities implies to take into account social dimensions in the production of tools, methods and archive processes. From a pragmatic point of view, Digital Humanities activities involve complex interpretative processes, linking human (individual and collective understanding) and algorithmic computation spaces. This articulation is emphasized in Prospéro software, but still has to support community dialog processes, which can be understood according to vocabulary alignment paradigm or socio-anthropological usage of language paradigm. In order to do so, we give some exploratory guidelines to express and historicize taxonomic processes and define the conditions by which algorithms could support such developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress\",\"volume\":\"442 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3423603.3424005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3423603.3424005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在跨学科的背景和不同的认知观点下,数字人文意味着在工具、方法和存档过程的生产中考虑到社会维度。从语用的角度来看,数字人文活动涉及复杂的解释过程,将人类(个人和集体理解)和算法计算空间联系起来。promassro软件强调了这种衔接,但仍然必须支持社区对话过程,这可以根据词汇对齐范式或语言的社会人类学使用范式来理解。为了做到这一点,我们给出了一些探索性的指导方针来表达和历史化分类过程,并定义了算法可以支持这种发展的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interoperability and discursive process about categories
With interdisciplinary contexts and various epistemic points of view, Digital Humanities implies to take into account social dimensions in the production of tools, methods and archive processes. From a pragmatic point of view, Digital Humanities activities involve complex interpretative processes, linking human (individual and collective understanding) and algorithmic computation spaces. This articulation is emphasized in Prospéro software, but still has to support community dialog processes, which can be understood according to vocabulary alignment paradigm or socio-anthropological usage of language paradigm. In order to do so, we give some exploratory guidelines to express and historicize taxonomic processes and define the conditions by which algorithms could support such developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信