投资法律和政策的制度发展

Taylor St John
{"title":"投资法律和政策的制度发展","authors":"Taylor St John","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3909815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dynamism of investment law was channelled through international institutions to a greater extent in 2017 than ever before. For decades, investment law has been defined by its decentralization—by the absence of an institutional hub for multilateral deliberations—and by the difficulty of accessing information about investment treaty negotiations or investor–state arbitrations. As institutions led the way towards more deliberation and increased transparency, the slow-moving redefinition of investment law continued in 2017. While the outcomes of this redefinition are not yet clear (and it remains to be seen if this redefinition will lead to more inclusive and institutionalized multilateral cooperation in investment law), what is clear is that institutions are players, and fields of play, to watch.","PeriodicalId":176067,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Global/International Economic Institutions (Topic)","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Developments in Investment Law and Policy\",\"authors\":\"Taylor St John\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3909815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dynamism of investment law was channelled through international institutions to a greater extent in 2017 than ever before. For decades, investment law has been defined by its decentralization—by the absence of an institutional hub for multilateral deliberations—and by the difficulty of accessing information about investment treaty negotiations or investor–state arbitrations. As institutions led the way towards more deliberation and increased transparency, the slow-moving redefinition of investment law continued in 2017. While the outcomes of this redefinition are not yet clear (and it remains to be seen if this redefinition will lead to more inclusive and institutionalized multilateral cooperation in investment law), what is clear is that institutions are players, and fields of play, to watch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Global/International Economic Institutions (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Global/International Economic Institutions (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Global/International Economic Institutions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年,投资法的活力比以往任何时候都更大程度地通过国际机构发挥作用。几十年来,投资法的特点是权力下放——缺乏多边审议的机构中心——以及难以获取有关投资条约谈判或投资者与国家仲裁的信息。随着机构带头进行更多审议和提高透明度,2017年投资法的重新定义仍在缓慢进行。虽然这种重新定义的结果尚不清楚(这种重新定义是否会导致投资法领域更具包容性和制度化的多边合作仍有待观察),但有一点是明确的,即机构是值得关注的参与者和游戏领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional Developments in Investment Law and Policy
The dynamism of investment law was channelled through international institutions to a greater extent in 2017 than ever before. For decades, investment law has been defined by its decentralization—by the absence of an institutional hub for multilateral deliberations—and by the difficulty of accessing information about investment treaty negotiations or investor–state arbitrations. As institutions led the way towards more deliberation and increased transparency, the slow-moving redefinition of investment law continued in 2017. While the outcomes of this redefinition are not yet clear (and it remains to be seen if this redefinition will lead to more inclusive and institutionalized multilateral cooperation in investment law), what is clear is that institutions are players, and fields of play, to watch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信