生物学狂乱的

A. Horwitz
{"title":"生物学狂乱的","authors":"A. Horwitz","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The DSM-III did not dictate any particular cause of mental disorder. It classified each diagnosis through its symptoms, not by what factors led symptoms to emerge. Indeed, the manual’s theoretical neutrality was a key reason why the diverse factions within psychiatry and other mental health professions accepted it. The next transformation in views of mental illness involved yoking the DSM-III’s symptom-based diagnoses to the view that mental disorders were brain diseases produced by malfunctioning neurochemical systems and problematic genes. Since 1980, psychiatry has replaced the biopsychosocial model with a bio-bio-bio model that emphasizes brains, genes, and medications. A single-minded focus on psychopharmacology has supplanted the pluralist combination of psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, and drug treatments that characterized the field during the postwar period. Over a short time period, the biological study of mental illness evolved from a marginal and discredited enterprise to become the dominant model in not just psychiatry but also popular culture.","PeriodicalId":434335,"journal":{"name":"Between Sanity and Madness","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biology Re-Emerges\",\"authors\":\"A. Horwitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The DSM-III did not dictate any particular cause of mental disorder. It classified each diagnosis through its symptoms, not by what factors led symptoms to emerge. Indeed, the manual’s theoretical neutrality was a key reason why the diverse factions within psychiatry and other mental health professions accepted it. The next transformation in views of mental illness involved yoking the DSM-III’s symptom-based diagnoses to the view that mental disorders were brain diseases produced by malfunctioning neurochemical systems and problematic genes. Since 1980, psychiatry has replaced the biopsychosocial model with a bio-bio-bio model that emphasizes brains, genes, and medications. A single-minded focus on psychopharmacology has supplanted the pluralist combination of psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, and drug treatments that characterized the field during the postwar period. Over a short time period, the biological study of mental illness evolved from a marginal and discredited enterprise to become the dominant model in not just psychiatry but also popular culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Between Sanity and Madness\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Between Sanity and Madness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between Sanity and Madness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190907860.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DSM-III没有规定精神障碍的任何特定原因。它根据症状对每种诊断进行分类,而不是根据导致症状出现的因素。事实上,这本手册在理论上的中立性是精神病学和其他心理健康专业的不同派别接受它的一个关键原因。精神疾病观点的下一个转变是将DSM-III基于症状的诊断与精神障碍是由神经化学系统故障和问题基因引起的脑部疾病的观点结合起来。自1980年以来,精神病学用强调大脑、基因和药物的生物-生物-生物模型取代了生物-心理-社会模型。对精神药理学的单一关注已经取代了战后该领域的特点——心理治疗、社会心理干预和药物治疗的多元结合。在很短的一段时间内,精神疾病的生物学研究从一个边缘的、声名狼藉的事业,发展成为不仅在精神病学,而且在流行文化中占主导地位的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biology Re-Emerges
The DSM-III did not dictate any particular cause of mental disorder. It classified each diagnosis through its symptoms, not by what factors led symptoms to emerge. Indeed, the manual’s theoretical neutrality was a key reason why the diverse factions within psychiatry and other mental health professions accepted it. The next transformation in views of mental illness involved yoking the DSM-III’s symptom-based diagnoses to the view that mental disorders were brain diseases produced by malfunctioning neurochemical systems and problematic genes. Since 1980, psychiatry has replaced the biopsychosocial model with a bio-bio-bio model that emphasizes brains, genes, and medications. A single-minded focus on psychopharmacology has supplanted the pluralist combination of psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, and drug treatments that characterized the field during the postwar period. Over a short time period, the biological study of mental illness evolved from a marginal and discredited enterprise to become the dominant model in not just psychiatry but also popular culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信