集线器标记稀疏图精确距离查询的硬度

A. Kosowski, P. Uznański, L. Viennot
{"title":"集线器标记稀疏图精确距离查询的硬度","authors":"A. Kosowski, P. Uznański, L. Viennot","doi":"10.1145/3293611.3331625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A distance labeling scheme is an assignment of bit-labels to the vertices of an undirected, unweighted graph such that the distance between any pair of vertices can be decoded solely from their labels. An important class of distance labeling schemes is that of hub labelings, where a node ν ∈ G stores its distance to the so-called hubs Sν ⊆ V, chosen so that for any u,ν ∈ V there is w ∈ Su ∩ Sv belonging to some shortest uv path. Notice that for most existing graph classes, the best distance labelling constructions existing use at some point a hub labeling scheme at least as a key building block. Our interest lies in hub labelings of sparse graphs, i.e., those with |E(G)| = O (n), for which we show a lowerbound of n 2O (√log n) for the average size of the hubsets. Additionally, we show a hub-labeling construction for sparse graphs of average size O(√n RS (n)c) for some 0 < c < 1, where RS (n) is the so-called Ruzsa-Szemerédi function, linked to structure of induced matchings in dense graphs. This implies that further improving the lower bound on hub labeling size to n over 2(log n)o(1 would require a breakthrough in the study of lower bounds on RS (n), which have resisted substantial improvement in the last 70 years. For general distance labeling of sparse graphs, we show a lowerbound of 1 over 2Θ(√log n) SumIndex (n), where SumIndex (n) is the communication complexity of the SUM-I problem over Zn. Our results suggest that the best achievable hub-label size and distance-label size in sparse graphs may be Θ(n over 2(log n)c ) for some 0 < c < 1.,","PeriodicalId":153766,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":"15 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hardness of Exact Distance Queries in Sparse Graphs Through Hub Labeling\",\"authors\":\"A. Kosowski, P. Uznański, L. Viennot\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3293611.3331625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A distance labeling scheme is an assignment of bit-labels to the vertices of an undirected, unweighted graph such that the distance between any pair of vertices can be decoded solely from their labels. An important class of distance labeling schemes is that of hub labelings, where a node ν ∈ G stores its distance to the so-called hubs Sν ⊆ V, chosen so that for any u,ν ∈ V there is w ∈ Su ∩ Sv belonging to some shortest uv path. Notice that for most existing graph classes, the best distance labelling constructions existing use at some point a hub labeling scheme at least as a key building block. Our interest lies in hub labelings of sparse graphs, i.e., those with |E(G)| = O (n), for which we show a lowerbound of n 2O (√log n) for the average size of the hubsets. Additionally, we show a hub-labeling construction for sparse graphs of average size O(√n RS (n)c) for some 0 < c < 1, where RS (n) is the so-called Ruzsa-Szemerédi function, linked to structure of induced matchings in dense graphs. This implies that further improving the lower bound on hub labeling size to n over 2(log n)o(1 would require a breakthrough in the study of lower bounds on RS (n), which have resisted substantial improvement in the last 70 years. For general distance labeling of sparse graphs, we show a lowerbound of 1 over 2Θ(√log n) SumIndex (n), where SumIndex (n) is the communication complexity of the SUM-I problem over Zn. Our results suggest that the best achievable hub-label size and distance-label size in sparse graphs may be Θ(n over 2(log n)c ) for some 0 < c < 1.,\",\"PeriodicalId\":153766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"15 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3293611.3331625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3293611.3331625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

距离标注方案是为无向、无加权图的顶点分配位标签,使得任何顶点对之间的距离可以仅从它们的标签来解码。一个重要的距离标注方案是集线器标注方案,其中节点ν∈G存储其到所谓集线器sn∈V的距离,对于任意u,ν∈V,有w∈Su∩Sv属于某个最短uv路径。请注意,对于大多数现有的图类,现有的最佳距离标记结构在某些时候至少使用中心标记方案作为关键构建块。我们的兴趣在于稀疏图的集线器标记,即那些具有|E(G)| = O (n)的集线器标记,对于这些集线器集的平均大小,我们给出了n2o(√log n)的下界。此外,我们展示了一个平均大小为0(√n RS (n)c)的稀疏图的中心标记结构,其中RS (n)是所谓的ruzsa - szemersamedi函数,与密集图中的诱导匹配结构相关联。这意味着进一步提高轮毂标注尺寸的下界到n / 2(log n)o(1)将需要在RS (n)下界的研究上取得突破,在过去的70年里,RS (n)下界的研究一直没有实质性的进步。对于稀疏图的一般距离标注,我们给出了1 / 2Θ(√log n) SumIndex (n)的下界,其中SumIndex (n)是SUM-I问题在Zn上的通信复杂度。我们的结果表明,对于某些0 < c < 1,稀疏图中可实现的最佳中心标签大小和距离标签大小可能为Θ(n / 2(log n)c)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hardness of Exact Distance Queries in Sparse Graphs Through Hub Labeling
A distance labeling scheme is an assignment of bit-labels to the vertices of an undirected, unweighted graph such that the distance between any pair of vertices can be decoded solely from their labels. An important class of distance labeling schemes is that of hub labelings, where a node ν ∈ G stores its distance to the so-called hubs Sν ⊆ V, chosen so that for any u,ν ∈ V there is w ∈ Su ∩ Sv belonging to some shortest uv path. Notice that for most existing graph classes, the best distance labelling constructions existing use at some point a hub labeling scheme at least as a key building block. Our interest lies in hub labelings of sparse graphs, i.e., those with |E(G)| = O (n), for which we show a lowerbound of n 2O (√log n) for the average size of the hubsets. Additionally, we show a hub-labeling construction for sparse graphs of average size O(√n RS (n)c) for some 0 < c < 1, where RS (n) is the so-called Ruzsa-Szemerédi function, linked to structure of induced matchings in dense graphs. This implies that further improving the lower bound on hub labeling size to n over 2(log n)o(1 would require a breakthrough in the study of lower bounds on RS (n), which have resisted substantial improvement in the last 70 years. For general distance labeling of sparse graphs, we show a lowerbound of 1 over 2Θ(√log n) SumIndex (n), where SumIndex (n) is the communication complexity of the SUM-I problem over Zn. Our results suggest that the best achievable hub-label size and distance-label size in sparse graphs may be Θ(n over 2(log n)c ) for some 0 < c < 1.,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信