时态和透视式内容

P. Ludlow
{"title":"时态和透视式内容","authors":"P. Ludlow","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198823797.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is tense, as some contend, merely a feature of language (linguistic tense) or is it used to express some perspectival feature of the world? Many have argued that a proper analysis of linguistic tense would say that the tense operators in natural language express nonperspectival features of the world—that past and future linguistic tense are just used to express static universal relations between events or times. Tensers and detensers are split on precisely this point: tensers take tense to express an irreducible and real perspectival feature of the world, and detensers think it is a superficial property of language or thought that refers to aperspectival contents. In this chapter tense is among several examples of perspectival content. It is argued that perspectival contents, or interperspectival contents, are expressed in different ways from different perspectival positions.","PeriodicalId":187590,"journal":{"name":"Interperspectival Content","volume":"237 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tense and Interperspectival Content\",\"authors\":\"P. Ludlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198823797.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is tense, as some contend, merely a feature of language (linguistic tense) or is it used to express some perspectival feature of the world? Many have argued that a proper analysis of linguistic tense would say that the tense operators in natural language express nonperspectival features of the world—that past and future linguistic tense are just used to express static universal relations between events or times. Tensers and detensers are split on precisely this point: tensers take tense to express an irreducible and real perspectival feature of the world, and detensers think it is a superficial property of language or thought that refers to aperspectival contents. In this chapter tense is among several examples of perspectival content. It is argued that perspectival contents, or interperspectival contents, are expressed in different ways from different perspectival positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interperspectival Content\",\"volume\":\"237 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interperspectival Content\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198823797.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interperspectival Content","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198823797.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时态,就像一些人争论的那样,仅仅是语言的一个特征(语言时态),还是用来表达世界的一些视角特征?许多人认为,对语言时态进行适当的分析会发现,自然语言中的时态操作符表达的是世界的非视角特征——过去和将来的语言时态只是用来表达事件或时间之间的静态普遍关系。张量派和辩护派正是在这一点上分裂的:张量派用时态来表达世界的一种不可约的、真实的透视特征,辩护派则认为它是语言或思想的一种表面化的、指向透视内容的属性。在本章中,时态是透视内容的几个例子之一。本文认为,透视内容或透视间内容在不同的透视立场上有不同的表达方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tense and Interperspectival Content
Is tense, as some contend, merely a feature of language (linguistic tense) or is it used to express some perspectival feature of the world? Many have argued that a proper analysis of linguistic tense would say that the tense operators in natural language express nonperspectival features of the world—that past and future linguistic tense are just used to express static universal relations between events or times. Tensers and detensers are split on precisely this point: tensers take tense to express an irreducible and real perspectival feature of the world, and detensers think it is a superficial property of language or thought that refers to aperspectival contents. In this chapter tense is among several examples of perspectival content. It is argued that perspectival contents, or interperspectival contents, are expressed in different ways from different perspectival positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信