Epley与Semont手法治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕

Aravind Karuppan Muthu, K. Bongale, V. Bhat
{"title":"Epley与Semont手法治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕","authors":"Aravind Karuppan Muthu, K. Bongale, V. Bhat","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is characterized by brief but violent attacks of paroxysmal vertigo provoked by certain positions of the head. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Epley and Semont maneuvers for the relief of vertigo in posterior semicircular canal BPPV. Materials and Methods This was a prospective comparative study conducted in a tertiary referral hospital over 1 year. Among 70 cases of BPPV, 35 were treated with Epley and 35 with Semont maneuver. Follow-up was done at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months to assess symptomatic improvement using visual analogue scale. Results Out of 70 patients of BPPV, 62 patients responded very well to the maneuvers and got relief from vertigo. Thirty-two patients (91.4%) in the Epley group and 30 (85.7%) patients in the Semont group had a significant improvement post-therapy and the balance was the same in both groups. At 1 month, there was no significant statistical difference in mean visual analogue score (VAS) score between both groups. Conclusion Majority of cases showed symptomatic improvement with both maneuvers. However, patients treated with Epley maneuver showed earlier relief from vertigo than those treated with the Semont maneuver.","PeriodicalId":108664,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology and Neurotology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epley versus Semont Maneuver in the Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo\",\"authors\":\"Aravind Karuppan Muthu, K. Bongale, V. Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1761405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is characterized by brief but violent attacks of paroxysmal vertigo provoked by certain positions of the head. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Epley and Semont maneuvers for the relief of vertigo in posterior semicircular canal BPPV. Materials and Methods This was a prospective comparative study conducted in a tertiary referral hospital over 1 year. Among 70 cases of BPPV, 35 were treated with Epley and 35 with Semont maneuver. Follow-up was done at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months to assess symptomatic improvement using visual analogue scale. Results Out of 70 patients of BPPV, 62 patients responded very well to the maneuvers and got relief from vertigo. Thirty-two patients (91.4%) in the Epley group and 30 (85.7%) patients in the Semont group had a significant improvement post-therapy and the balance was the same in both groups. At 1 month, there was no significant statistical difference in mean visual analogue score (VAS) score between both groups. Conclusion Majority of cases showed symptomatic improvement with both maneuvers. However, patients treated with Epley maneuver showed earlier relief from vertigo than those treated with the Semont maneuver.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology and Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology and Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology and Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

良性阵发性体位性眩晕(BPPV)的特点是由头部的某些位置引起的阵发性眩晕短暂而猛烈的发作。本研究旨在比较Epley和Semont手法对后半规管BPPV眩晕的缓解效果。材料与方法本研究是在一家三级转诊医院进行的为期一年的前瞻性比较研究。70例BPPV中,35例采用Epley手法,35例采用Semont手法。随访时间分别为1周、1个月和3个月,采用视觉模拟量表评估症状改善情况。结果70例BPPV患者中,62例患者对眩晕反应良好,眩晕症状得到缓解。Epley组32例(91.4%)和Semont组30例(85.7%)患者治疗后明显改善,两组平衡相同。1个月时,两组患者的平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较,差异无统计学意义。结论两种手法均可改善多数病例的症状。然而,用Epley手法治疗的患者比用Semont手法治疗的患者更早缓解眩晕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epley versus Semont Maneuver in the Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Abstract Introduction Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is characterized by brief but violent attacks of paroxysmal vertigo provoked by certain positions of the head. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of Epley and Semont maneuvers for the relief of vertigo in posterior semicircular canal BPPV. Materials and Methods This was a prospective comparative study conducted in a tertiary referral hospital over 1 year. Among 70 cases of BPPV, 35 were treated with Epley and 35 with Semont maneuver. Follow-up was done at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months to assess symptomatic improvement using visual analogue scale. Results Out of 70 patients of BPPV, 62 patients responded very well to the maneuvers and got relief from vertigo. Thirty-two patients (91.4%) in the Epley group and 30 (85.7%) patients in the Semont group had a significant improvement post-therapy and the balance was the same in both groups. At 1 month, there was no significant statistical difference in mean visual analogue score (VAS) score between both groups. Conclusion Majority of cases showed symptomatic improvement with both maneuvers. However, patients treated with Epley maneuver showed earlier relief from vertigo than those treated with the Semont maneuver.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信