主题分区集合的分片排序和截止估计

Anagha Kulkarni, Almer S. Tigelaar, D. Hiemstra, Jamie Callan
{"title":"主题分区集合的分片排序和截止估计","authors":"Anagha Kulkarni, Almer S. Tigelaar, D. Hiemstra, Jamie Callan","doi":"10.1145/2396761.2396833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large document collections can be partitioned into 'topical shards' to facilitate distributed search. In a low-resource search environment only a few of the shards can be searched in parallel. Such a search environment faces two intertwined challenges. First, determining which shards to consult for a given query: shard ranking. Second, how many shards to consult from the ranking: cutoff estimation. In this paper we present a family of three algorithms that address both of these problems. As a basis we employ a commonly used data structure, the central sample index (CSI), to represent the shard contents. Running a query against the CSI yields a flat document ranking that each of our algorithms transforms into a tree structure. A bottom up traversal of the tree is used to infer a ranking of shards and also to estimate a stopping point in this ranking that yields cost-effective selective distributed search. As compared to a state-of-the-art shard ranking approach the proposed algorithms provide substantially higher search efficiency while providing comparable search effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":313414,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shard ranking and cutoff estimation for topically partitioned collections\",\"authors\":\"Anagha Kulkarni, Almer S. Tigelaar, D. Hiemstra, Jamie Callan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2396761.2396833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large document collections can be partitioned into 'topical shards' to facilitate distributed search. In a low-resource search environment only a few of the shards can be searched in parallel. Such a search environment faces two intertwined challenges. First, determining which shards to consult for a given query: shard ranking. Second, how many shards to consult from the ranking: cutoff estimation. In this paper we present a family of three algorithms that address both of these problems. As a basis we employ a commonly used data structure, the central sample index (CSI), to represent the shard contents. Running a query against the CSI yields a flat document ranking that each of our algorithms transforms into a tree structure. A bottom up traversal of the tree is used to infer a ranking of shards and also to estimate a stopping point in this ranking that yields cost-effective selective distributed search. As compared to a state-of-the-art shard ranking approach the proposed algorithms provide substantially higher search efficiency while providing comparable search effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2396833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2396833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

大型文档集合可以划分为“局部碎片”,以方便分布式搜索。在低资源搜索环境中,只有少数分片可以并行搜索。这样的搜索环境面临着两个相互交织的挑战。首先,确定对于给定的查询要查询哪些分片:分片排名。其次,要从排名中参考多少分片:截止估计。在本文中,我们提出了一组三种算法来解决这两个问题。作为基础,我们使用一种常用的数据结构,即中心样本索引(CSI)来表示分片内容。对CSI运行查询会产生一个平面文档排名,我们的每个算法都将其转换为树结构。使用自底向上的树遍历来推断分片的排名,并估计该排名中的停止点,从而产生具有成本效益的选择性分布式搜索。与最先进的分片排序方法相比,所提出的算法提供了更高的搜索效率,同时提供了相当的搜索效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shard ranking and cutoff estimation for topically partitioned collections
Large document collections can be partitioned into 'topical shards' to facilitate distributed search. In a low-resource search environment only a few of the shards can be searched in parallel. Such a search environment faces two intertwined challenges. First, determining which shards to consult for a given query: shard ranking. Second, how many shards to consult from the ranking: cutoff estimation. In this paper we present a family of three algorithms that address both of these problems. As a basis we employ a commonly used data structure, the central sample index (CSI), to represent the shard contents. Running a query against the CSI yields a flat document ranking that each of our algorithms transforms into a tree structure. A bottom up traversal of the tree is used to infer a ranking of shards and also to estimate a stopping point in this ranking that yields cost-effective selective distributed search. As compared to a state-of-the-art shard ranking approach the proposed algorithms provide substantially higher search efficiency while providing comparable search effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信