执行《必须遵守公约》?康菲石油和埃克森美孚诉委内瑞拉玻利瓦尔共和国

J. C. Boué
{"title":"执行《必须遵守公约》?康菲石油和埃克森美孚诉委内瑞拉玻利瓦尔共和国","authors":"J. C. Boué","doi":"10.1093/JNLIDS/IDU007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2007, the government of Venezuela decided to re-structure certain oil projects, known as Associations, so as to bring them in line with the 2001 Hydrocarbons Law. In response, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips decided to exit Venezuela. Supposedly motivated by a commitment to uphold the principle of sanctity of contract, the companies subsequently initiated a series of arbitrations involving some of the largest claims ever put before international tribunals. However, the bargains that the companies insist they are defending are not reflected in the agreements that they had actually signed. Thus, these arbitrations amount to an attempt on the part of these companies to use international arbitral tribunals to re-draft on their behalf the contracts they had negotiated, so as to secure a windfall (which they had never bargained for) upon their exit from Venezuela.","PeriodicalId":131966,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcing Pacta Sunt Servanda? Conoco-Phillips and Exxon-Mobi Versus the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Boué\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JNLIDS/IDU007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2007, the government of Venezuela decided to re-structure certain oil projects, known as Associations, so as to bring them in line with the 2001 Hydrocarbons Law. In response, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips decided to exit Venezuela. Supposedly motivated by a commitment to uphold the principle of sanctity of contract, the companies subsequently initiated a series of arbitrations involving some of the largest claims ever put before international tribunals. However, the bargains that the companies insist they are defending are not reflected in the agreements that they had actually signed. Thus, these arbitrations amount to an attempt on the part of these companies to use international arbitral tribunals to re-draft on their behalf the contracts they had negotiated, so as to secure a windfall (which they had never bargained for) upon their exit from Venezuela.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JNLIDS/IDU007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JNLIDS/IDU007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2007年,委内瑞拉政府决定重组某些石油项目,即所谓的协会,以使其符合2001年的《碳氢化合物法》。作为回应,埃克森美孚和康菲石油公司决定退出委内瑞拉。据称,出于维护合同神圣性原则的承诺,两家公司随后发起了一系列仲裁,涉及一些有史以来提交给国际法庭的最大索赔。然而,这些公司坚称他们正在捍卫的交易并没有反映在他们实际签署的协议中。因此,这些仲裁相当于这些公司企图利用国际仲裁法庭代表它们重新起草它们谈判的合同,以便在它们离开委内瑞拉时获得一笔横财(这是它们从未讨价还价过的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enforcing Pacta Sunt Servanda? Conoco-Phillips and Exxon-Mobi Versus the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
In 2007, the government of Venezuela decided to re-structure certain oil projects, known as Associations, so as to bring them in line with the 2001 Hydrocarbons Law. In response, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips decided to exit Venezuela. Supposedly motivated by a commitment to uphold the principle of sanctity of contract, the companies subsequently initiated a series of arbitrations involving some of the largest claims ever put before international tribunals. However, the bargains that the companies insist they are defending are not reflected in the agreements that they had actually signed. Thus, these arbitrations amount to an attempt on the part of these companies to use international arbitral tribunals to re-draft on their behalf the contracts they had negotiated, so as to secure a windfall (which they had never bargained for) upon their exit from Venezuela.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信