母亲与儿子哈姆雷特笛卡尔式疯狂的动力

John DeCarlo
{"title":"母亲与儿子哈姆雷特笛卡尔式疯狂的动力","authors":"John DeCarlo","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20116146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In his Hamlet essay: \"Hamlet and His Problems,\" T.S. Eliot conceived Hamlet as an artistic failure, pointing at the inexplicable manner in which Hamlet is obsessed with his mother's behavior; and how in terms of an objective correlative, Gertrude is not only an inadequate object for the emotions generated in the play, but also unable to support them. In other words, the problem of the play lies not in the character of Hamlet, but in the author's treatment of \"the effect of a mother's guilt upon her son.\" (1) But might there be an image that distills Hamlet's emotional connection to his mother? Picture Hamlet standing in the graveyard contemplating the universal and fleeting nature of life, while also holding the skull of Yorick, the symbol of all that is wild, silly and ridiculous. Might such a juxtaposition of consciousness correspond to the conceptual form of Descartes' Cogito, whereby a determined reason and a determined madness stand both together, and yet separate? By the same token, while Elliot's superego considered Shakespeare, the artist, incapable of controlling his disordered subjectivity and to transform it to the literary tradition that preceded him or surrounded him, might the philosophical form of the Cogito, which Shakespeare implicitly pre-figures in the play, be the form which helps to understand Hamlet's intense feelings towards his mother's sexual behavior? (2) In keeping with the assertion that the play as a whole is problematic, Eliot also suggests that Stoll is correct in steering away from a psychological reading of the leading character, in terms of staying \"nearer in spirit to Shakespeare's art.\" (3) In this respect, it seems that Eliot is correct in asserting that some other factor must be responsible for Hamlet's emotions. However, in asserting that the dominating emotion is \"inexpressible, because it is in excess of the facts as they appear\" (4) seems to be misleading in terms of Eliot's underestimation of the play's philosophical dimensions, and the degree that Hamlet's psychological response to his philosophical concerns spills over to his perception and judgment of his mother's behavior. In contrast, it will be developed how Hamlet's judgment of his mother's sexual behavior and her shameless attitude toward it, is intensified by his own restless sense of shame related to his unguarded philosophical doubts. A) Hamlet's Pre-Cartesian Doubt In keeping with Eliot's assertion that \"there was an older play by Thomas Kyd,\" (5) most critics agree that Kyd probably wrote the UR-Hamlet, performed during the late 1580's and early 1590's. Considering that Kyd's version already contained the elements of the Ghost, the play within the play, etc, as well as the conditions of the Elizabethan stage and conventions of the revenge tragedy, it would give great insight into Shakespeare's innovations and underlying intentions. Since the primary source has been irrevocably lost, Shakespeare's intentions are not clear and remain shrouded in mystery. However, contrary to Eliot's assertion that \"in the earlier play the motive was a revenge-motive simply; that the action or delay is caused, as in the Spanish Tragedy, solely by the difficulty of assassinating a monarch surrounded by guards,\" (6) MacCary asserts that while the questioning of the role of the avenger was a \"creaking convention\" in the genre of the revenge drama, as demonstrated in the Spanish Tragedy, which Hamlet closely parallels, it is undoubtedly raised to the level of profound philosophical speculation in Hamlet. (7) In other words, notwithstanding the \"verbal parallels\" between the two plays, Shakespeare was not, as Eliot suggests, \"merely revising the text of Kyd.\" (8) In fact, as soon as the audience begins to experience the drama unfold before them, it is evident the customary authority has been altered, if not inverted. Rather than being asked by Francisco, who is on duty, Bernardo, who is obviously anxious about the strange visitations of the Ghost who has been \"usurp[ing]\" the \"night\"(I. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mother and Son: The Dynamics of Hamlet’s Cartesian Madness\",\"authors\":\"John DeCarlo\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20116146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction In his Hamlet essay: \\\"Hamlet and His Problems,\\\" T.S. Eliot conceived Hamlet as an artistic failure, pointing at the inexplicable manner in which Hamlet is obsessed with his mother's behavior; and how in terms of an objective correlative, Gertrude is not only an inadequate object for the emotions generated in the play, but also unable to support them. In other words, the problem of the play lies not in the character of Hamlet, but in the author's treatment of \\\"the effect of a mother's guilt upon her son.\\\" (1) But might there be an image that distills Hamlet's emotional connection to his mother? Picture Hamlet standing in the graveyard contemplating the universal and fleeting nature of life, while also holding the skull of Yorick, the symbol of all that is wild, silly and ridiculous. Might such a juxtaposition of consciousness correspond to the conceptual form of Descartes' Cogito, whereby a determined reason and a determined madness stand both together, and yet separate? By the same token, while Elliot's superego considered Shakespeare, the artist, incapable of controlling his disordered subjectivity and to transform it to the literary tradition that preceded him or surrounded him, might the philosophical form of the Cogito, which Shakespeare implicitly pre-figures in the play, be the form which helps to understand Hamlet's intense feelings towards his mother's sexual behavior? (2) In keeping with the assertion that the play as a whole is problematic, Eliot also suggests that Stoll is correct in steering away from a psychological reading of the leading character, in terms of staying \\\"nearer in spirit to Shakespeare's art.\\\" (3) In this respect, it seems that Eliot is correct in asserting that some other factor must be responsible for Hamlet's emotions. However, in asserting that the dominating emotion is \\\"inexpressible, because it is in excess of the facts as they appear\\\" (4) seems to be misleading in terms of Eliot's underestimation of the play's philosophical dimensions, and the degree that Hamlet's psychological response to his philosophical concerns spills over to his perception and judgment of his mother's behavior. In contrast, it will be developed how Hamlet's judgment of his mother's sexual behavior and her shameless attitude toward it, is intensified by his own restless sense of shame related to his unguarded philosophical doubts. A) Hamlet's Pre-Cartesian Doubt In keeping with Eliot's assertion that \\\"there was an older play by Thomas Kyd,\\\" (5) most critics agree that Kyd probably wrote the UR-Hamlet, performed during the late 1580's and early 1590's. Considering that Kyd's version already contained the elements of the Ghost, the play within the play, etc, as well as the conditions of the Elizabethan stage and conventions of the revenge tragedy, it would give great insight into Shakespeare's innovations and underlying intentions. Since the primary source has been irrevocably lost, Shakespeare's intentions are not clear and remain shrouded in mystery. However, contrary to Eliot's assertion that \\\"in the earlier play the motive was a revenge-motive simply; that the action or delay is caused, as in the Spanish Tragedy, solely by the difficulty of assassinating a monarch surrounded by guards,\\\" (6) MacCary asserts that while the questioning of the role of the avenger was a \\\"creaking convention\\\" in the genre of the revenge drama, as demonstrated in the Spanish Tragedy, which Hamlet closely parallels, it is undoubtedly raised to the level of profound philosophical speculation in Hamlet. (7) In other words, notwithstanding the \\\"verbal parallels\\\" between the two plays, Shakespeare was not, as Eliot suggests, \\\"merely revising the text of Kyd.\\\" (8) In fact, as soon as the audience begins to experience the drama unfold before them, it is evident the customary authority has been altered, if not inverted. Rather than being asked by Francisco, who is on duty, Bernardo, who is obviously anxious about the strange visitations of the Ghost who has been \\\"usurp[ing]\\\" the \\\"night\\\"(I. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":288505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20116146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL20116146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言 T.S. 艾略特在他的《哈姆雷特》一文中"T.S.艾略特在《哈姆雷特和他的问题》一文中,将《哈姆雷特》视为艺术上的失败,指出哈姆雷特对母亲行为的痴迷令人费解;从客观相关性的角度来看,格特鲁德不仅不是剧中情感产生的适当对象,而且也无法支撑这种情感。换言之,该剧的问题不在于哈姆雷特的性格,而在于作者对 "母亲的愧疚对儿子的影响 "的处理。(1)但是否有一个形象可以提炼出哈姆雷特与母亲的情感联系呢?想象一下,哈姆雷特站在墓地里思考生命的普遍性和短暂性,同时还拿着象征一切狂野、愚蠢和可笑的约里克的头骨。这样的意识并置是否符合笛卡尔《Cogito》的概念形式,即坚定的理性和坚定的疯狂既站在一起,又相互分离?同样,当埃利奥特的超我认为作为艺术家的莎士比亚无法控制自己混乱的主观性并将其转化为先于他或围绕着他的文学传统时,莎士比亚在剧中暗含预设的 "Cogito "的哲学形式是否有助于理解哈姆雷特对母亲性行为的强烈感受?(2)为了与 "全剧存在问题 "的论断保持一致,艾略特还认为,斯托尔从 "精神上更接近莎士比亚的艺术 "的角度出发,避免对剧中主角进行心理解读是正确的。(3)就此而言,艾略特主张哈姆雷特的情感必须由其他因素造成,似乎是正确的。然而,艾略特断言主导情感的是 "无法表达的,因为它超出了事实的表象"(4),这似乎有误导之嫌,因为艾略特低估了该剧的哲学维度,低估了哈姆雷特对其哲学关切的心理反应波及他对母亲行为的感知和判断的程度。相比之下,哈姆雷特对母亲性行为的判断以及她对性行为的无耻态度,是如何被他自己因毫无戒备的哲学疑虑而产生的躁动不安的羞耻感所强化的。A) 哈姆雷特的前笛卡尔式怀疑 艾略特曾断言 "托马斯-凯德有一个更古老的剧本",(5) 大多数评论家都认为凯德很可能创作了《哈姆雷特》(UR-Hamlet),并在 15 世纪 80 年代末和 90 年代初上演。考虑到基德的版本已经包含了《鬼魂》、戏中戏等元素,以及伊丽莎白时代的舞台条件和复仇悲剧的惯例,它可以让人对莎士比亚的创新和深层意图有更深入的了解。由于原始资料已经无可挽回地遗失,莎士比亚的意图并不明确,仍然笼罩在神秘的阴影之下。然而,与艾略特断言的 "在早先的戏剧中,动机仅仅是复仇;"(6)麦克卡里断言,尽管对复仇者角色的质疑是复仇剧体裁中的 "吱吱作响的惯例",正如《西班牙悲剧》中所展示的那样,而《哈姆雷特》与《西班牙悲剧》有着密切的相似之处,但在《哈姆雷特》中,这种质疑无疑被提升到了深刻的哲学推测的高度。(7)换句话说,尽管两剧之间存在 "言语上的相似之处",但莎士比亚并不像艾略特所说的那样,"只是修改了凯德的文本"。(8)事实上,当观众开始体验眼前展开的戏剧时,很明显,习惯上的权威被改变了,甚至被颠倒了。弗朗西斯科正在值班,而贝尔纳多显然对 "篡夺""夜晚"(I. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mother and Son: The Dynamics of Hamlet’s Cartesian Madness
Introduction In his Hamlet essay: "Hamlet and His Problems," T.S. Eliot conceived Hamlet as an artistic failure, pointing at the inexplicable manner in which Hamlet is obsessed with his mother's behavior; and how in terms of an objective correlative, Gertrude is not only an inadequate object for the emotions generated in the play, but also unable to support them. In other words, the problem of the play lies not in the character of Hamlet, but in the author's treatment of "the effect of a mother's guilt upon her son." (1) But might there be an image that distills Hamlet's emotional connection to his mother? Picture Hamlet standing in the graveyard contemplating the universal and fleeting nature of life, while also holding the skull of Yorick, the symbol of all that is wild, silly and ridiculous. Might such a juxtaposition of consciousness correspond to the conceptual form of Descartes' Cogito, whereby a determined reason and a determined madness stand both together, and yet separate? By the same token, while Elliot's superego considered Shakespeare, the artist, incapable of controlling his disordered subjectivity and to transform it to the literary tradition that preceded him or surrounded him, might the philosophical form of the Cogito, which Shakespeare implicitly pre-figures in the play, be the form which helps to understand Hamlet's intense feelings towards his mother's sexual behavior? (2) In keeping with the assertion that the play as a whole is problematic, Eliot also suggests that Stoll is correct in steering away from a psychological reading of the leading character, in terms of staying "nearer in spirit to Shakespeare's art." (3) In this respect, it seems that Eliot is correct in asserting that some other factor must be responsible for Hamlet's emotions. However, in asserting that the dominating emotion is "inexpressible, because it is in excess of the facts as they appear" (4) seems to be misleading in terms of Eliot's underestimation of the play's philosophical dimensions, and the degree that Hamlet's psychological response to his philosophical concerns spills over to his perception and judgment of his mother's behavior. In contrast, it will be developed how Hamlet's judgment of his mother's sexual behavior and her shameless attitude toward it, is intensified by his own restless sense of shame related to his unguarded philosophical doubts. A) Hamlet's Pre-Cartesian Doubt In keeping with Eliot's assertion that "there was an older play by Thomas Kyd," (5) most critics agree that Kyd probably wrote the UR-Hamlet, performed during the late 1580's and early 1590's. Considering that Kyd's version already contained the elements of the Ghost, the play within the play, etc, as well as the conditions of the Elizabethan stage and conventions of the revenge tragedy, it would give great insight into Shakespeare's innovations and underlying intentions. Since the primary source has been irrevocably lost, Shakespeare's intentions are not clear and remain shrouded in mystery. However, contrary to Eliot's assertion that "in the earlier play the motive was a revenge-motive simply; that the action or delay is caused, as in the Spanish Tragedy, solely by the difficulty of assassinating a monarch surrounded by guards," (6) MacCary asserts that while the questioning of the role of the avenger was a "creaking convention" in the genre of the revenge drama, as demonstrated in the Spanish Tragedy, which Hamlet closely parallels, it is undoubtedly raised to the level of profound philosophical speculation in Hamlet. (7) In other words, notwithstanding the "verbal parallels" between the two plays, Shakespeare was not, as Eliot suggests, "merely revising the text of Kyd." (8) In fact, as soon as the audience begins to experience the drama unfold before them, it is evident the customary authority has been altered, if not inverted. Rather than being asked by Francisco, who is on duty, Bernardo, who is obviously anxious about the strange visitations of the Ghost who has been "usurp[ing]" the "night"(I. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信