ECL模型对欧洲银行监管资本的影响

Manuela Rodrigues Boscia, Jose Alves Dantas, V. Leone, H. Kimura
{"title":"ECL模型对欧洲银行监管资本的影响","authors":"Manuela Rodrigues Boscia, Jose Alves Dantas, V. Leone, H. Kimura","doi":"10.20525/ijfbs.v11i3.1926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper’s purpose was to assess whether the effects on the regulatory capital of the ECL model in European banks differs among those that adopted IRB or standardized approaches to credit risk management. The empirical tests revealed that there was a significant reduction in the level of capita buffers of European banks when the IFRS 9 was first adopted, and that this reduction was more pronounced among banks using a standardized approach to credit risk than for those that relied on an IRB approach. Further testing confirmed the premise that there was an underestimation of capital requirements in the period prior to the adoption of the ECL. The study fills a gap in literature, by evaluating the difference in the impact of adopting the ECL model on the banking system, as a function of the credit risk management approach for capital purposes. The assessment of what happened in the European banking system can be used as a guidance to other jurisdictions still in transition to the ECL model.","PeriodicalId":181605,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)","volume":"2001 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the ECL Model on Regulatory Capital in European Banks\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Rodrigues Boscia, Jose Alves Dantas, V. Leone, H. Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.20525/ijfbs.v11i3.1926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper’s purpose was to assess whether the effects on the regulatory capital of the ECL model in European banks differs among those that adopted IRB or standardized approaches to credit risk management. The empirical tests revealed that there was a significant reduction in the level of capita buffers of European banks when the IFRS 9 was first adopted, and that this reduction was more pronounced among banks using a standardized approach to credit risk than for those that relied on an IRB approach. Further testing confirmed the premise that there was an underestimation of capital requirements in the period prior to the adoption of the ECL. The study fills a gap in literature, by evaluating the difference in the impact of adopting the ECL model on the banking system, as a function of the credit risk management approach for capital purposes. The assessment of what happened in the European banking system can be used as a guidance to other jurisdictions still in transition to the ECL model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)\",\"volume\":\"2001 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i3.1926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v11i3.1926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是评估ECL模式对欧洲银行监管资本的影响是否与采用IRB或标准化信贷风险管理方法的银行不同。实证检验显示,当首次采用IFRS 9时,欧洲银行的人均缓冲水平显著降低,并且在使用标准化信贷风险方法的银行中,这种降低比那些依赖IRB方法的银行更为明显。进一步的测试证实了一个前提,即在采用ECL之前的一段时间里,对资本需求的估计被低估了。该研究通过评估采用ECL模型对银行体系的影响差异,作为资本目的信用风险管理方法的功能,填补了文献中的空白。对欧洲银行体系所发生情况的评估,可以作为其他仍在向ECL模式过渡的司法管辖区的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the ECL Model on Regulatory Capital in European Banks
The paper’s purpose was to assess whether the effects on the regulatory capital of the ECL model in European banks differs among those that adopted IRB or standardized approaches to credit risk management. The empirical tests revealed that there was a significant reduction in the level of capita buffers of European banks when the IFRS 9 was first adopted, and that this reduction was more pronounced among banks using a standardized approach to credit risk than for those that relied on an IRB approach. Further testing confirmed the premise that there was an underestimation of capital requirements in the period prior to the adoption of the ECL. The study fills a gap in literature, by evaluating the difference in the impact of adopting the ECL model on the banking system, as a function of the credit risk management approach for capital purposes. The assessment of what happened in the European banking system can be used as a guidance to other jurisdictions still in transition to the ECL model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信